Hi Sudip
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 12:28:20AM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 08:23:58PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > What are the benefits of doing so?
> > The only benefit will be that we will be able to update the libraries
> > irrespective of kernel update. libbpf
Found similar issue in kernel mailing list:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/30/119
I don't know anything about these "jumbo frames" thought, but problem is
similar to my issue.
Hi,
The next point release for "buster" (10.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
February 8th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.12) is scheduled for Saturday,
February 8th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 23:07:22 + Ben Hutchings
wrote:
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 16:48 -0500, debian wrote:
Printing spurious error messages is a bug, and we will fix it (whether
in kmod or in initramfs-tools, is to be decided).
So the change causing it should be reverted until it has been
Control: severity -1 serious
This bug resulted in system breakage for me.
I'm using an Intel 82579V gigabit NIC with a gigabit router and failing to
copy built-in modules prevented the NIC from negotiating with gigabit speeds.
After applying the patch, creating a new initramfs and rebooting,
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #948257 [initramfs-tools] depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515
lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file
'/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_N1a1Mk/lib/modules/5.4.0-1-amd64/modules.builtin.bin'
Bug #948301 [initramfs-tools] libkmod2:
7 matches
Mail list logo