Bug#954778: marked as done (linux-image-amd64: if using make bindeb-pkg there is a warning about the missing debug package)

2020-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:22:16 +0200
with message-id <4888497.0TKaKLWQZd@apollon>
and subject line Bug#954778: Suppress irrelevant warning when generating a 
debian package
has caused the Debian Bug report #954778,
regarding linux-image-amd64: if using make bindeb-pkg there is a warning about 
the missing debug package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
954778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954778
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 5.4.19-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,


   * What led up to the situation?
 Compiling a new kernel from the source

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
 make -j10 bindeb-pkg

   * What was the outcome of this action?
 A warning that there is no debug package

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
 No such warning.

I attach a patch to include the debug package in the
control file only if it is built later


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.6.0-rc7 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-image-amd64 depends on:
ii  linux-image-5.4.0-4-amd64  5.4.19-1

linux-image-amd64 recommends no packages.

linux-image-amd64 suggests no packages.
Include the debug package in the control file only if it is to be created
diff --git a/scripts/package/mkdebian b/scripts/package/mkdebian
index 357dc56bcf30..1673b9f84804 100755
--- a/scripts/package/mkdebian
+++ b/scripts/package/mkdebian
@@ -198,7 +198,10 @@ Description: Linux support headers for userspace 
development
  This package provides userspaces headers from the Linux kernel.  These headers
  are used by the installed headers for GNU glibc and other system libraries.
 Multi-Arch: same
+EOF

+if [ -n "$BUILD_DEBUG" ] ; then
+cat <> debian/control
 Package: $dbg_packagename
 Section: debug
 Architecture: $debarch
@@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ Description: Linux kernel debugging symbols for $version
  This package will come in handy if you need to debug the kernel. It provides
  all the necessary debug symbols for the kernel and its modules.
 EOF
+fi

 cat < debian/rules
 #!$(command -v $MAKE) -f
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
version 5.7~rc5-1~exp1--- End Message ---


Processed: tagging 962254

2020-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 962254 + pending
Bug #962254 [src:linux] NFSv4.2: umask not applied on filesystem without ACL 
support
Bug #934160 [src:linux] NFSv4.2: umask not applied on filesystem without ACL 
support
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
934160: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934160
962254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#963493: Repeatable hard lockup running strace testsuite using 4.19.118+2+deb10u1, 4.19.98+1+deb10u1 works fine

2020-06-22 Thread Steve McIntyre
Source: linux
Version: 4.19.118-2+deb10u1
Severity: serious

Hi folks,

Trying to reproduce #963462 on my Thinkpad T470, I'm repeatedly
getting a hard lockup running the strace testsuite. I've done this 4
times to be sure. Each time it seems to have failed in a slightly
different place in the testsuite (suggesting it's not one particular
syscall test that's triggering the failure). Only one of the 4 lockups
left eny evidence in the logs (reproduced below), so I'm not sure if
the error here is actually the root of the problem or not. :-/

The machine is not noticeably running hot or anything while doing
these tests.

Rebooting back to 4.19.0-8-amd64 (aka 4.9.98+1+deb10u1), I've just run
the same testsuite twice in a row and it ran to completion with no
lockup.

Here's the one bit of log that I did get, in case it's useful.

Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.195906] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -849; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.195910] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -849; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.195971] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -518; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.195974] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -518; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.195977] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -1; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.195979] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -1; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.199661] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -849; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.199674] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -849; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.199917] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -518; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.199982] futex_wake_op: futex tries to shift 
op by -518; fix this program
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.398755] L1TF CPU bug present and SMT on, 
data leak possible. See CVE-2018-3646 and 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-gui
de/hw-vuln/l1tf.html for details.
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587324] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 32174 at 
mm/page_alloc.c:4385 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x241/0x2b0
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587326] Modules linked in: acpi_call(OE) 
ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo nft_counter 
nft_chain_nat_ipv4 nf_
nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype nft_compat xt_conntrack nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 
nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp overlay devlink cpufreq_userspace 
cpufreq_conser
vative cpufreq_powersave ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler nf_tables nfnetlink 
appletalk psnap llc ax25 pci_stub vboxpci(OE) vboxnetadp(OE) vboxnetflt(OE) 
vboxdrv(OE) cmac 
bnep fuse binfmt_misc pktcdvd snd_hda_codec_hdmi btusb btrtl btbcm btintel 
bluetooth uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 
videobuf2_common snd_hd
a_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic videodev media drbg ansi_cprng 
ecdh_generic nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat arc4 intel_rapl snd_soc_skl msr 
snd_soc_skl_ipc snd_soc_
sst_ipc
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587344]  snd_soc_sst_dsp 
x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp snd_hda_ext_core coretemp 
snd_soc_acpi_intel_match iwlmvm snd_soc_ac
pi kvm_intel snd_soc_core mac80211 snd_compress wmi_bmof i915 snd_hda_intel 
iwlwifi kvm snd_hda_codec snd_h
da_core irqbypass snd_hwdep evdev intel_cstate joydev snd_pcm_oss 
drm_kms_helper intel_uncore serio_raw intel_rapl_perf mei_me snd_mixer_oss 
cfg80211 sg efi_pstore drm pcspkr mei efivars snd_pcm ucsi_acpi snd_timer 
typec_ucsi i2c_algo_bit iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support intel_pch_thermal typec 
thinkpad_acpi tpm_crb wmi nvram snd soundcore tpm_tis rfkill video tpm_tis_core 
battery pcc_cpufreq ac tpm rng_core acpi_pad button parport_pc nfsd ppdev 
auth_rpcgss lp nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc parport efivarfs ip_tables x_tables 
autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 crc32c_generic
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587362]  fscrypto ecb btrfs zstd_decompress 
zstd_compress xxhash algif_skcipher af_alg sr_mod cdrom uas usb_storage 
dm_crypt dm_mod raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq 
async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod 
sd_mod crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc ahci 
aesni_intel libahci aes_x86_64 crypto_simd libata cryptd xhci_pci glue_helper 
xhci_hcd e1000e psmouse scsi_mod usbcore i2c_i801 thermal usb_common
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587375] CPU: 2 PID: 32174 Comm: keyctl 
Tainted: G   OE 4.19.0-9-amd64 #1 Debian 4.19.118-2+deb10u1
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587376] Hardware name: LENOVO 
20HD000EUK/20HD000EUK, BIOS N1QET67W (1.42 ) 10/03/2017
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587377] RIP: 
0010:__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x241/0x2b0
Jun 22 11:36:49 tack kernel: [  318.587379] Code: 89 f7 89 ee 45 31 f6 e8 4d d5 
ff ff e9 fb fe ff ff e8 73 ae 01 00 e9 cb 

Processed: tagging 963239

2020-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 963239 - moreinfo
Bug #963239 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-9-amd64: software raid array resync 
at boot (raid5)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
963239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: tagging 963017

2020-06-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 963017 - moreinfo
Bug #963017 [src:linux] linux-image-5.6.0-2-amd64: System freezes shortly after 
boot
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
963017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#962134: [External] Re: Bug#962134: add Sound Open Firmware

2020-06-22 Thread Mark Pearson

On 6/4/2020 9:21 AM, Mark Pearson wrote:


OK - I have asked the SOF folk to talk to you about this. I'll unicast 
you the email address so you have the correct contact details too.


I know some discussions started with the SOF folk. Has there been any 
progress for this issue?

Anything that is stuck that I can help with?
Thanks
Mark