Dear Maintainer,
Forgot to include in my initial report that I found the workaround using
this (German) thread in the Proxmox Support Forum:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/adaptec-aacraid-expose_physicals-kernelbug.63256/
The thread is fairly light on details, but it appears to indicate
On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 15:38:32 CET Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Unfortunately the setting `1` allows direct write access to the devices,
> whereas the previous and to my understanding the default setting of `-1`
> only allows read access, making this a safer option.
>
> It appears that aacraid's
Hi Helmut,
On 1/4/23 14:26, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 02:08:00PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
My suggestion:
Please check that the /run mountpoint is mounted with at least 20MB, independend
of the installed RAM memory in the machine...
Your suggestion makes sense in
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.158-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: duester...@woltlab.com
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading my server from Debian Buster to Debian Bullseye, I
noticed that the underlying devices attached to the Adaptec 6405E raid
controller were no longer exposed via the
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 initramfs-tools-core
Bug #1027915 [systemd] systemd requires /run to be mounted with a minimum size
of 20MB
Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'initramfs-tools-core'.
No longer marked as found in versions systemd/252.4-1.
Ignoring request to alter
5.10 should be EOL by now
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 3:51 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.10.158-2
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: duester...@woltlab.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> after upgrading my server from Debian Buster to Debian Bullseye, I
> noticed that the
Hello,
Job Title: Financial Crimes Data Science Sr. Manager
Position Type: Full Time Remote
Client : Key Bank
Job description
*ABOUT THE JOB (JOB BRIEF)*
Reporting to the Director of Financial Crimes Modeling & Analytics that
reports to the Chief Modeling and Analytics Officer, the Data
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1020899 0.1.3.0-1
Bug #1020899 {Done: Ilias Tsitsimpis }
[src:haskell-byte-order] haskell-byte-order: BD-Uninstallable on armel, armhf,
i386, mipsel
No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.1.3.0-1.
> tags 1023443 - sid
Bug #1023443
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: severity -1 normal
On Wed, 04 Jan 2023 12:04:52 +0100 xevilstar wrote:
> Package: linux-image-6.2.0-rc2
> Version: 6.2.0-rc2-1
>
> I am testing linux kernel 6.2-rc2
That is great, but you should report any issues you find to the relevant
upstream maintainers.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 upstream
Bug #1027891 [src:linux] linux-image-6.2.0-rc2: cannot connect via ethernet
Added tag(s) upstream.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1027891 [src:linux] linux-image-6.2.0-rc2: cannot connect via ethernet
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
--
On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 16:39:33 CET Renato Gallo wrote:
> 5.10 should be EOL by now
Please refrain from comments like that.
It doesn't help at all and is also plain false.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1027921 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204769
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/bug-204769-11...@https.bugzilla.kernel.org%2F/
Bug #1027921 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-20-amd64: aacraid's
expose_physicals=-1 is not
Currently flame graph generation requires a d3-flame-graph template to
be installed. Unfortunately this is hard to come by for things like
Debian [1]. If the template isn't installed warn and download it from
jsdelivr CDN. If downloading fails generate a minimal flame graph
again with the
Source: linux
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: miguel.bernal.ma...@linux.intel.com,
jair.de.jesus.gonzalez.plascen...@intel.com
Dear Maintainer,
Intel is planing to release the next-generation Xeon products [1] and some
of the features are not enabled on Debian. Some of those are
Hi Renato
On 1/4/23 16:39, Renato Gallo wrote:
5.10 should be EOL by now
According to https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html, Linux 5.10
is supported until 2026.
Whether a fix for this bug qualifies as an "important bugfix" acceptable
for a LTS kernel I can't tell.
In any case,
Source: linux
Severity: wishlist
Tags: ipv6
X-Debbugs-Cc: jerome.pouil...@gmail.com
Hi folks,
"RPL Source Routing Header" (CONFIG_IPV6_RPL_LWTUNNEL) is currently
disabled. It seems it is only an oversight since this option is not
explicitly mentioned in debian kernel config file (and features
Hi Taavi,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 03:54:16PM +0200, Taavi Ansper wrote:
> Are there any news regarding when the fix would be implemented for bullseye?
See
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/181536c494aa39ca78b190396a97072448739411.ca...@suse.com/
for an upstream status. Once the patches land in
17 matches
Mail list logo
