iproute2_6.7.0-2.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
iproute2_6.7.0-2.1.dsc
iproute2_6.7.0-2.1.debian.tar.xz
iproute2_6.7.0-2.1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:03:30 +0100
Source: iproute2
Architecture: source
Version: 6.7.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By:
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Luca,
this bug causes issues to /usr-move. iproute2 pulls libtirpc3 and
nothing pulls libtirpc3t64. Hence, the we still include libtirpc3, which
is aliased rather than libtirpc3t64, which is /usr-moved. To fix this,
I'd need a binNMU of iproute2, but this bug would
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1065214 [src:iproute2] iproute2: recent libc6-dev change causes the RPC
support to be dropped
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1065214: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065214
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Somehow this email did not reach the destinations, trying once more...
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 06:04:37PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm eventually acknowledging that I'm poorly suited as maintainer
> of the dwarves package. I don't follow its development and don't use
> it
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:43:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065214: fixed in iproute2 6.7.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065214,
regarding iproute2: recent libc6-dev change causes the RPC support to be dropped
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Diederik,
Thank you for taking care of this!
First the additional changes you found seem reasonable.
Regarding edac - I checked NXPs reference BSP for LX2160,
and their linux fork has the same status, driver can not be enabled on arm64.
However I also agree it should be enabled if it were
Hi Diederik,
I believe I found the answer:
EDAC_MPC85XX is for power-pc only,
EDAC_LAYERSCAPE is for arm (see drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c).
br
Josua
Am 12.03.24 um 16:13 schrieb Josua Mayer:
> Hi Diederik,
>
> Thank you for taking care of this!
> First the additional changes you found seem
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #1033663 [src:linux] linux: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path in
various binaries
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
--
1033663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
iproute2_6.8.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
iproute2_6.8.0-1.dsc
iproute2_6.8.0.orig.tar.xz
iproute2_6.8.0-1.debian.tar.xz
iproute2_6.8.0-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Because Debian builds packages from a fixed build path, neither the 'reprotest'
utility in Salsa-CI, nor the Reproducible Builds team's package test
infrastructure for Debian[1] currently check for equivalent binary package
output from differing
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:02:38 +
Source: iproute2
Architecture: source
Version: 6.8.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By: Luca
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:39:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065214: fixed in iproute2 6.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065214,
regarding iproute2: recent libc6-dev change causes the RPC support to be dropped
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:39:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063002: fixed in iproute2 6.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063002,
regarding iproute2: [INTL:it] Italian po-debconf translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Josua,
On Tuesday, 12 March 2024 16:28:06 CET Josua Mayer wrote:
> I believe I found the answer:
> EDAC_MPC85XX is for power-pc only,
> EDAC_LAYERSCAPE is for arm (see drivers/edac/layerscape_edac.c).
You're right. In the commit I referenced earlier (ea2eb9a8b6207ee4),
I misinterpreted the
15 matches
Mail list logo