On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:56:03PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The major issue for d-i with 2.6.13 is the dropped devfs support.
It is only disabled.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Horms wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I am forwarding this to the IDE Tape maintainer for his consideration.
>
Thank you. Please tell me if anything comes out of it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:04:26PM -0700, lordSauron wrote:
> so...
>
> I already have grub (lucky me) and it already is my default boot
> loader. So, do those commands to change kernels, are they just
> options of kernels to boot? So, I specify to grub that the amd64-k8
> kernel is the one I wa
so...
I already have grub (lucky me) and it already is my default boot
loader. So, do those commands to change kernels, are they just
options of kernels to boot? So, I specify to grub that the amd64-k8
kernel is the one I want to use default, start using it, then I can
just remove the old kernel
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:41:28 +0900
> Is there any discussion of how that should be done floating around,
> and how much work do you think would be involved?
Not really, Patrick McHardy and myself simply decided that
is what is needed last time this got discussed
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:29:43PM +1000, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.82
> Followup-For: Bug #323077
>
> e2fsprogs is dying due to the new virtual DSO linux-gate.so
> as described here
> http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/08/linux-gate/
>
> see attached patch fo
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:58:44PM -0700, lordSauron wrote:
> forgive me - I'm very new to linux. I have a AMD Athlon64 3000+ chip,
> and I just installed Debian linux with kernel version 2.4.27-2 i386,
> so my chip is running in 32-bit emulation mode (to the best of my
> knowledge) I'd like to i
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:50:39AM +, enediel gonzalez wrote:
> >From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: enediel gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: debian stable version (installation problems)
> >Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:47:36 +0900
> >
> >On Su
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:36:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have made available backport packages of the linux-2.6 common kernels for
> powerpc for sarge. You will find all that is needed at :
>
> http://people.debian.org/~luther/kernel
>
> or the apt source :
>
> deb http:/
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:07:51PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:43:28 +0200
>
> > Dave Miller didn't like the usage of xtime.tv_sec (via get_seconds()),
> > as it can be changed from the outside which may cause problems. S
Thanks to everyone for feedback. The situation is somewhat more clear now.
In summary:
* d-i is fine as far as we keep the traditional initrd support for a
while. As Bastian mentioned, it is pretty much guaranteed that it is
going to be supported until 2.6.15, which gives the d-i team some t
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.82
Followup-For: Bug #323077
e2fsprogs is dying due to the new virtual DSO linux-gate.so
as described here
http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/08/linux-gate/
see attached patch for a possible fix
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstabl
forgive me - I'm very new to linux. I have a AMD Athlon64 3000+ chip,
and I just installed Debian linux with kernel version 2.4.27-2 i386,
so my chip is running in 32-bit emulation mode (to the best of my
knowledge) I'd like to install the 2.6.8-11 amd64-k8 kernel, however,
and use it. I tried t
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:56:03PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 12 September 2005 03:23, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > 2. What changes need to be done to integrate a new initrd-generating
> > tool into the kernel packaging infrastracture. It might be as simple as
> > switching the postinst of kern
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
kernel-build-2.6.10-1 | 2.6.10-6 | sparc
kernel-doc-2.6.10 | 2.6.10-6 | all
kernel-headers-2.6.10-1 | 2.6.10-1 | hppa
kernel-headers-2.6.10-1 | 2.6.10-2 | alpha
kernel-headers-2.6.1
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
kernel-build-2.6.11-1 | 2.6.11-5 | sparc
kernel-build-2.6.11-power3 | 2.6.11-2 | powerpc
kernel-build-2.6.11-power3-smp | 2.6.11-2 | powerpc
kernel-build-2.6.11-power4 | 2.6.11-2 |
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:44:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi, the following packages :
> linux-headers-2.6-32, (...)
> should be removed from the archive.
Already done via rene.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 323183 kernel
Bug#323183: Please remove some linux packages from sid
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `kernel'.
> tags 323183 moreinfo
Bug#323183: Please remove some linux packages from sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: mo
In linux.debian.kernel Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The major issue for d-i with 2.6.13 is the dropped devfs support. However,
>there already is support for udev in d-i; what's currently missing is a
>udeb for hotplug. What we have was backported by Colin Watson from
Actually we have h
On Monday 12 September 2005 03:23, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> 2. What changes need to be done to integrate a new initrd-generating
> tool into the kernel packaging infrastracture. It might be as simple as
> switching the postinst of kernel packages from running mkinitrd to
> running yaird. I have no ide
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:43:28 +0200
> Dave Miller didn't like the usage of xtime.tv_sec (via get_seconds()),
> as it can be changed from the outside which may cause problems. So,
> in short, I have to find a better fix (although I'm perfectly happy
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:14:49AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Hi Horms,
>> can you please
>> a) correct the changelog in SVN
>
> Done.
>
>> b) check whether CAN-2005-2873 is fixed as well
>
> That bug does seem to be present in 2.4.27, 2.6.8, 2.6.12, 2.6.13
> a
Hi all,
I would like to add a short report about this bug.
I installed my Apple Powerbook G4 with the 2.6.8 directly from the
netinst.iso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
Linux monteverdi 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Fri May 20 10:37:45 JST 2005 ppc
GNU/Linux
and it seems that this issue doesn't appear with this k
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:49:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > filippo, with his devscripts' co-maint hat on
>
> What about supporting various formats, and in particular supporting our own
> proposed format ?
Looks fine to me, please feel free to open a bug against devscripts (I'll do if
needed
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >>>Notice that the [] part will probably become a standard all among
> >>>debian as dch enforces it, so maybe it is worthwhile thinking about it.
> >>
> >>Yes, perhaps I should be attacking the root of the problem.
CLIENT ALERT - For your immediate review:
Sorry for the initial delay, but your file has now been reviewed and we are
happy to present you with three options for you to consider.
Please note that this is a time sensitive matter and that your previous credit
situation should not be a factor.
#include
* Jurij Smakov [Sun, Sep 11 2005, 06:23:25PM]:
> Hello,
>
> As you probably know, the 2.6.13 kernel is out, and we are facing some
> problems with packaging it for Debian. A major change compared to 2.6.12
> is the discontinued support for devfs, which, I understand, renders
> current
Horms wrote:
>>>Notice that the [] part will probably become a standard all among
>>>debian as dch enforces it, so maybe it is worthwhile thinking about it.
>>
>>Yes, perhaps I should be attacking the root of the problem. See #326064.
>>Perhaps discussion of this is a bit premature until we hear
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
>>Today it happened when i unplugged the computer from the power suply and went
>>on battery. I noticed that the framebuffer did not answer to "raise the bright
>>level" (fn-f2) key, and few seconds after it died on me.
>
>
> may it be related to the nvidia chip for whic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> noowner 325704
Bug#325704: "Kernel oops with c2faxsend"
Removed annotation that Bug was owned by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
noowner 325704
thanks
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Re[2]: capi4hylafax: latest drivers?
To: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Lionel,
this problem has another origin. While reconstructing kernel 2.6. the call
of "capilib_release_a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:25:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Why do we need klibc for initramfs?
> small size.
LVM and multipath-tools are not built against klibc and the first don't
support it.
> nice tools for initial userspace.
libc or too
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:20:29PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > as next step an initramfs-tools upload is planed for that week.
>
> Why do we need klibc for initramfs?
small size.
nice tools for initial userspace.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: enediel gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian stable version (installation problems)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:47:36 +0900
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:12:43AM +, enediel gonzalez wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Using the ne
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:10:43AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> A major drawback of yaird is lack of configuration. this has been added in
> latest release, and I have now spend all night packaging it, so should be
> available by tomorrow night in sid. Until then it can be grabbed at
> http:
Hello,
when we discussed the initrd issue yesterday, I tested yaird on my
ide-based laptop, and it worked fine out of the box.
I think we should have a closer look at it, but be prepared for problems
as already the package description states it is not well tested and
might have problems on SCSI
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:20:29PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> as next step an initramfs-tools upload is planed for that week.
Why do we need klibc for initramfs?
> ps we could simply reenable devfs in 2.6.13,
> as only the Makefile snippet was removed,
> but that's not a long-term option s
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:23:25PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As you probably know, the 2.6.13 kernel is out, and we are facing some
> > problems
> > with packaging it for Debian. A major change compared to 2.6.12 is the
> > disco
Hi Anthony,
I am forwarding this to the IDE Tape maintainer for his consideration.
--
Horms
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:43:54AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: important
>
> amverify started, then shortly later (after the first
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:49:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:39:57PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:51:43PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc
> > > Version: 2.6.12-6
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > The maxim
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:34:08PM +0200, Alessandro Di Rubbo wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Followup-For: Bug #312255
>
>
> If I boot the system using kernel 2.6, after the message "Starting GNOME
> DISPLAY MANAGER: gdm", a messy image appears, similar to my des
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:13:48AM +0200, Arno Peters wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: normal
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> Current setup: server protected by APC UPS. Monitoring of UPC status
> using apcupsd package via USB.
H
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:37:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:13:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:00:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > kernel-package (>= 8.135) [!powerpc] | kernel-package (>= 8.135.sarge1)
> > > > [powerpc]
> > >
> > > I di
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:13:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:00:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > kernel-package (>= 8.135) [!powerpc] | kernel-package (>= 8.135.sarge1)
> > > [powerpc]
> >
> > I did another change, but maybe it was not needed, so i think the above is a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:00:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:50:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:36:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have made available backport packages of the linux-2.6 common kernels
> > > for
> > > p
This is FYI, Moritz confirmend there is nothing confidential here.
- Forwarded message from Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:38:42 +0900
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:50:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:36:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have made available backport packages of the linux-2.6 common kernels for
> > powerpc for sarge. You will find all that is needed at :
> >
> > http://people
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:05:32AM +0300, Sam (Uli) Freed wrote:
> Subject: linux-2.6: Cannot find USB devices on 2.6.13.1, on ICH4m chipset.
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: normal
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> This is a bug in 2.6.13.1, as downloaded from kernel.org, a
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:36:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have made available backport packages of the linux-2.6 common kernels for
> powerpc for sarge. You will find all that is needed at :
>
> http://people.debian.org/~luther/kernel
>
> or the apt source :
>
> deb http:/
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:12:43AM +, enediel gonzalez wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Using the netinst CD , I'm trying to install the stable version of
> debian, (i386)
>
> The PC has an Realtek onboard network card, I faced some errors installing,
> so, I decided to desactivate it an added a 3com9
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:27:31AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing :
> > >
> > > 2. It must be compiled and up to date o
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:51:43PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
[...]
>> Please note that 'beep' is working at the normal level, so it may
>> be a problem related to only PCM channel.
>
> Appologies for my ignorance, but what sound chip and driver
> is used on your machine?
Kernel module should
severity 322723 important
thanks
there's a workaround, and gcc-3.4 is known to work as well. Is there
any reason to use gcc-4.0 for kernel builds on all architectures?
Frans Pop writes:
> I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the
> solution chosen in the kernel pac
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing :
> >
> > 2. It must be compiled and up to date on all architectures it has previously
> > been compiled for in unstable
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:39:57PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:51:43PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc
> > Version: 2.6.12-6
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > The maximum volume you may set using kernel 2.6.12 on a powerbook g4
> > Titanium
>
56 matches
Mail list logo
