On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:28:01AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to not
have it require any further backports.
As discussed on irc, this is useless non-sense. The new kernel-package is
needed on powerpc, and the alternative is to
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:29:53PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
Hm... how odd, never had the problem with the kernel packages before,
but that fixed it. Thanks for all the time, and sorry for the
trouble.On 9/25/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:29:53PM -0700, Fenrir wrote: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold |
Hi Manoj,
Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that
fixes some minor problems that prevent the sarge version
from being able to compile linux-2.6, which we would
like to get included in volatile.
The package, and its changes are here, though you
will have to ask Sven about the
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:34:11PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi Manoj,
Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that
fixes some minor problems that prevent the sarge version
from being able to compile linux-2.6, which we would
like to get included in volatile.
The package, and its
reassign 330003 bzip2 1.0.2-8.1
thanks
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:51:11PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
Hm... how odd, never had the problem with the kernel packages before, but
that fixed it. Thanks for all the time, and sorry for the trouble.
Yeah, that tells me it's not a bug in the kernel package,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 330003 bzip2 1.0.2-8.1
Bug#330003: kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27-11
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.4.27' to `bzip2'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Sven Luther wrote:
Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a release ?
I don't know. Why does the powerpc image build fail with E: Couldn't
find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.12-1-powerpc-miboot-di, since
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 only provides
linux-2.6_2.6.12-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-9.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-9.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-9_all.deb
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-9_i386.deb
to
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a release ?
I don't know. Why does the powerpc image build fail with E: Couldn't
find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.12-1-powerpc-miboot-di, since
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:15:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a release ?
I don't know. Why does the powerpc image build fail with E: Couldn't
find package
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:06:52PM +0200, Sébastien Platel wrote:
I have the same problem trying to compile some modules from
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686, here is my final output:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'
scripts/Makefile.build:13:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 03:58:31PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:58:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:02:57PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Hi,
I attended a product briefing at Computer Associates on Thursday, and one
of
the
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:29:28PM +0100, Steve Homer wrote:
Hi,
I've just recompiled kernel 2.6.8 to move siimage to a module and remove the
initrd functionality.
Everything works fine except for sshd which now is bouncing connects just
responding with a connection closed error. I've
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:32:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:17:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:26:02PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Matthew Wilcox has advised me on IRC that #329888 (FTBS on hppa)
is in fact a kernel problem, not a
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:07:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:28:01AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to not
have it require any further backports.
As discussed on irc, this is useless non-sense. The
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:57:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:53:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:36:01PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Ok, looks like people seem to want python more;
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:14:45AM -0500, Zach Lowry wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
File: kernel-image-2.6.8-2
Hello!
On the 2.6.8-2 kernel-tree, apparently there were a number of NFSv3
problems introduced which Linux later fixed in
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[Restored the original Cc list, please keep the @bugs.debian.org]
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:43:52PM +0200, Guillaume Delacour wrote:
I tryed with a 2.6.11.9 kernel, but i run debian stable, and i really
want to run debian
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:16:24AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
Package: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
Severity: minor
Version: 2.6.12-6
A module collection that just uses:
@$(MAKE) -C $(KERNEL_SOURCES) SUBDIRS=$(shell pwd) modules_install
to install its kernel modules will try to put its
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 329614 +patch
Bug#329614: -o relative-file puts it inside the build directory, which gets
deleted
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-9
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi all, it seems our 2.6.12-9 upload failed on hppa, the log is at :
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.12-9arch=hppastamp=1127729724file=logas=raw
And the extract of
Hi,
We have a build problem with the kernel on hppa and I was hoping to
use paer.debian.org to do some test builds. If there is a better machine
please let me know. Otherwise, would it be possible to get the following
build dependancies installed in the sid chroot?
gcc-4.0-hppa64
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to
not have it require any further backports.
Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for
backports.org, but I
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:31:49PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi Michael,
I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther
asked me to let you know when this happens so you can kick
of a cross compile on m68k.
I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther asked me to
let you know when this happens so you can kick of a cross compile on
m68k.
Thanks; I'll discard the -8 source then and fetch -9 out of incoming.
CLIENT ID - 7509
Contact Attempt #: 2
After finalizing your mort-refinance application we
are sorry to inform you that we cannot finance you for
the 3.68% rate we quoted. We however can try
to finance your home at a rate of 4.11%.
We apologize for this inconvenience.
Reassessment
tag 330157 +pending
thanks
I have fixed this in SVN by removing the spurious
drivers/serial/serial_core.c.orig portion of hppa.patch.
Kyle is doing a test build on hppa, and I will
upload tomorrow if that goes to plan.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 330157 +pending
Bug#330157: linux-2.6: [hppa] FTBFS -- hppa patch doesn't apply cleanly.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
* Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is
to not have it require any further backports.
Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:31:04PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther asked me to
let you know when this happens so you can kick of a cross compile on
m68k.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:35:00PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is
to not have it require any further
linux-2.6_2.6.12-8_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
linux-image-amiga_2.6.12-8_m68k.deb
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Our userspace software uses QUEUE target with iptables. We have reports from our
customers that their debian systems are chrashing (with panics). With other
distrubutions
we have detected similar
The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
attention upstream. This makes sense given that most ia64 machines are
SMP capable. In fact, I don't think there's a non-SMP capable ia64
machine on
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-8
Severity: important
hi,
for some reason the sbp2 module will not load properly -- it gives
errors about unknown symbols, viz.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modprobe sbp2
sbp2: Unknown symbol bus_to_virt
FATAL: Error inserting sbp2
I got this to work now by placing amd74xx as first entry
in /etc/modules. I'm not sure if that sort of manual intervention is
the normal solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:51:18PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The biggest headache with maintaining the ia64 kernel has probably been
with the non-SMP flavours. Generic/non-SMP configs seem to not get much
attention upstream. This makes sense given that most ia64 machines are
SMP capable.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:04:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:35:00PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Andres Salomon wrote:
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6
Hi,
We spoke about this last month (or was it earlier this month,
I forget), and at that time 2.6.8 was still being used by d-i.
It seems that the transition to 2.6.12 is going pretty well,
is the d-i team happy for 2.6.8 to be removed from the archive,
or would they like it left there for a bit
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:54:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
So, i guess there is some uncleanliness in the serial_core.c hppa patch, or
maybe someting else. Simon Horman mentioned that part of the hppa patch should
be separated and rejoin the main debian patches instead of keeping such a
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:33:11AM -0500, Jason Martens wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: normal
With this linux-image, DMA does not work with my cdrom burners. If I
try to enable it, I get the following message:
morpheus:~# hdparm -d1 /dev/hdb
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:23:48PM +0300, Ilkka Pietikäinen wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Our userspace software uses QUEUE target with iptables. We have reports from
our
customers that their debian systems are
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:27:56AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
Horms writes...
We have a build problem with the kernel on hppa and I was hoping to
use paer.debian.org to do some test builds. If there is a better machine
please let me know.
paer is the correct machine.
Thanks
Hi,
we've suffered a few build problems on hppa and as a result 2.6.10-8 and
-9 FTBS. What I had prepared as -10 seems to also have been broken in
that regards. Fortuately I noticed this halfway through uploading, and
have withdrawn the upload.
Right now I am preparing 2.6.10-10 again. This
46 matches
Mail list logo
