Re: [PATCH] Removal of duplicate options in debian/arch/config

2005-12-27 Thread Horms
Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As requested by fs on #debian-kernel, here is the first post in an > effort to identify and remove duplicate (and sometimes inconsistent) > options from the hierarchy of debian/arch/config, > debian/arch//config, and debian/arch//config. (at > least for the d

[PATCH] Removal of duplicate options in debian/arch/config

2005-12-27 Thread Rod Whitby
As requested by fs on #debian-kernel, here is the first post in an effort to identify and remove duplicate (and sometimes inconsistent) options from the hierarchy of debian/arch/config, debian/arch//config, and debian/arch//config. (at least for the debian/arch/arm/config.ixp4xx tree that concerns

Bug#344036: kernel-source-2.4.27: Patch to solve XFS compilation issues on 2.4.27-12

2005-12-27 Thread Fabrizio Di Campo
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Version: 2.4.27-12 Followup-For: Bug #344036 It seems that in the last diff (kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-12.diff.gz) function xfs_iput_new() has been modified adding a call to vn_mark_bad() Here is the fragment: +@@ -582,6 +599,11 @@ xfs_iput_new(xfs_inode_t *ip, +

Re: new powerpc.mk version.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Hi Manoj, ... > > Attached is a new version of powerpc.mk, which aims at replacing fully the > ppc.mk and ppc64.mk files. I think it is not yet fully mature on older system > as well as in the pure-64 case, but i will refine it as time

new powerpc.mk version.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
Hi Manoj, ... Attached is a new version of powerpc.mk, which aims at replacing fully the ppc.mk and ppc64.mk files. I think it is not yet fully mature on older system as well as in the pure-64 case, but i will refine it as time passes, but it would be nice if you could upload this one, after i con

Bug#344939: kernel: USB audio not working with CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH=y

2005-12-27 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
Package: kernel Severity: important https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1642 says: "this option is buggy and not compatible with ALSA's USB audio." Please disable CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH. Cheers, Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers un

Processed: Re: Bug#344900: kernel-package: fails to build kernel-image

2005-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 344900 linux-2.6 Bug#344900: kernel-package: fails to build kernel-image Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `linux-2.6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

call for last 2.6.14 changes

2005-12-27 Thread maximilian attems
maybe not really the last, but 2.6.14-7 is scheduled for tomorrow. contains 2.6.14.5 with networking, scsi and nfs security fix. please rush in if you have any additions. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344926: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: can't boot: /sys/block/hda/dev/: no such file

2005-12-27 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 Version: 2.6.14-5 Severity: normal Big problem with linux-image-2.6.14-2-686_2.6.14-5 on IBM Thinkpad r50e. One gets /sys/block/hda/dev/: no such file... messages... can't boot. No such problem with linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-10, linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7_2.6.

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 08:56:01AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:22:30 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:22:30 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> And the kernel architiceture is what is passed to the kernel >> Makefil

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 04:30:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:57 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> > The first hunk of this patch sets ARCH=ppc again for 32bit, i am > >> > not sure i will be going this way or not finally, since upstream > >> > re

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:23:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Umm. I'll accept part of this patch -- the part where you set >

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:57 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > The first hunk of this patch sets ARCH=ppc again for 32bit, i am >> > not sure i will be going this way or not finally, since upstream >> > recomends me to go with ARCH=powerpc on 32bit only for 2.6.16 and >> > later.

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:20 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:23:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Umm. I'll accept part of this patch -- the part where you set >> KERNEL_ARCH based on KPKG_SUBARCH. I'm not going to change the >> common/* s

Re: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:53:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:25:15 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > hi Manoj, about this issue, i attach a quick and dirty patch, which > > at least pinpoints the two places where we have an issue on > > powerpc

Re: Bug#344833: attached an ugly and hacky patch which allows me to build 2.6.15 on powerpc.

2005-12-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:23:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > Umm. I'll accept part of this patch -- the part where you set > KERNEL_ARCH based on KPKG_SUBARCH. I'm not going to change the > common/* stuff just for ppc. If it appears that needs changing, then > there is a