reassign 346281 kernel-package
thanks
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:00:06PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Why is the kernel headers package still installing a build
link?
We decided that this is correct.
The Wiki article at
http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 346281 kernel-package
Bug#346281: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: debconf question about
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686 even if no kernel is installed
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.15-1-686' to `kernel-package'.
thanks
Stopping
This problem seems no longer present today.
As such, the bugreport can be closed.
Jan
--
Q: Why do the police always travel in threes?
A: One to do the reading, one to do the writing, and the other keeps
an eye on the two intellectuals.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
current fact is that the qlaxxx firmware is gpl,
so on has all it's right in main.
It is GPL, except for the binary blob of firmware, as the two constitute
separate work, this is not a violation of the GPL. The exact licence, that
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:51:34 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#314973: Problem no longer present
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006, Andreas Degert wrote:
- only ttyS0 and ttyS1 are detected by the driver
- ttyS4 - ttyS7 are set with setserial in a boot script (which works
for Debian kernel 2.6.12, but not Debian kernel 2.6.15)
Some more search in the Internet revealed:
If you look at the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:51:46AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:35:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:03:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
In 2004, there was a GR that decided to put everything in main under the
DFSG. We had some discussions, but in the end, the result was that all
the non-free firmware bits have to be removed from main before we can
release etch.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:52:07AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
b) we move the affected modules to non-free. Well those that have their
licencing solved, the others will simply no more be distributed, or
distributed form an unofficial source.
Probably overkill, and causes
tags 339562 - pending
thanks
No patch was added for the bug and it is too late for -2.
Bastian
--
If some day we are defeated, well, war has its fortunes, good and bad.
-- Commander Kor, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3201.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:50:43AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
With this package installed, when you include sys/params.h in your
program, you will get a severe namespace pollution since
linux/autoconf.h indirectly gets included and it #undefs all sort of
CONFIG_ preprocessor macros (e.g. ELinks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
licenced modules. If we don't want to do that, the most honest way to handle
it is to get another GR out the door,explaining that this is not easily
possible or convenient at this time, and asking for an explicit exception for
kernel firmware. I would second such a GR.
Me
3) an effort seems to be happening inside the upstream kernel to use the
request_firmware infrastructure which allows to load firmware code from
userland through an hotplug mechanism. There seem to be more and more
drivers going this way, since there aare more in current git than
Lawrence Williams wrote:
I am asking for the in-kernel pwc module (Philips USB webcam) to be disabled
by default, as it doesn't work with the majority of their webcam chipsets
commonly in use. More importantly, it also conflicts with the resulting
package built from the source contained in the
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have an ASUS A8V motherboard. When I use both the on-board LAN, skge,
and the on-board Promise PDC20378 SATA controller, one or the other
dies. Ways to kill the machine
* Kyle McMartin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060110 16:20]:
I would argue it's the former. I can see the argument when it's a part of
the source code, but not when it's a completely seperate entity.
Sorry, but there is no difference regarding DFSG: If the binary blob is
actually seperated from the
reassign 346281 linux-2.6
thanks
Hi,
If you have decided that putting the build link in headers is
correct, then you get to fix this. The kernel-package tool does it
dofferently, and while you are not required to follow what k-p does,
any non-standard and unsupported changes you make
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 347412 linux-2.6
Bug#347412: using network (skge) and disk (SATA/promise) at same time = one
breaks
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
Hey,
Want to generate 1.5 - 3.5k easily from the comfort
of your own home with minimal effort?
Call me here to do it : 1*888*699*7696
Payments are made daily.
Thank you,
Vance Jackson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Want to generate 1.5 - 3.5k easily from the comfort
of your own home with minimal effort?
Call me here to do it : 1*888*699*7696
Payments are made daily.
Thank you,
Alta Templeton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
---BeginMessage---
The patch titled
CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
config_airo-needs-config_crypto.patch
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
airo.c currently has MICSUPPORT enabled, which requires CONFIG_CRYPTO. A
user reported
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:45:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
You may redistribute the hardware specific firmware binary file
under the following terms:
1. Redistribution of source code (only if applicable),
must retain the above copyright notice, this list of
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:38:21AM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:45:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
You may redistribute the hardware specific firmware binary file
under the following terms:
1. Redistribution of source code (only if applicable),
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 346281 linux-2.6
Bug#346281: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: debconf question about
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686 even if no kernel is installed
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `linux-2.6'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339080: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#343147: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344515: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#346141: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#346273: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#346366: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.15-2_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.15-2_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.15-2_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.15-2_s390.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.15-2.diff.gz
to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:33:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
reassign 346281 linux-2.6
thanks
Hi,
If you have decided that putting the build link in headers is
correct, then you get to fix this. The kernel-package tool does it
dofferently, and while you are not required to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:00:53AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
3) an effort seems to be happening inside the upstream kernel to use the
request_firmware infrastructure which allows to load firmware code from
userland through an hotplug mechanism. There seem to be more and more
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:19:47PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Kyle McMartin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060110 16:20]:
I would argue it's the former. I can see the argument when it's a part of
the source code, but not when it's a completely seperate entity.
Sorry, but there is no difference
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:47:14PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
airo.c currently has MICSUPPORT enabled, which requires CONFIG_CRYPTO.
A user reported a build failure which is due to the lack of a Kconfig
dependency. See http://bugs.debian.org/344205.
This patch makes Kconfig enforce this
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:33:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
reassign 346281 linux-2.6 thanks
Hi,
If you have decided that putting the build link in headers is
correct, then you get to fix this. The
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-1
I upgraded to linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 and found that kismet no longer
worked. Neither could I set the card into monitor mode via iwconfig or
airmon. It's an ipw2915, which has worked more or less with various
ipw2200 drivers until today.
A
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:33:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
reassign 346281 linux-2.6 thanks
Hi,
If you have decided that putting the
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.48
The new option in Debian Installer to automatically partition using LVM
creates a system where / and most other partitions are on LVM, but /boot
is a separate real partition.
The initrd created using initramfs-tools fails to boot with this setup and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at
Package: linux-source-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
make-kpkg --stem=XXX --revision=2.6.15-2 kernel_image modules_image
.
.
.
gzip -9qf
/usr/src/linux/debian/XXX-image-2.6.15/usr/share/doc/XXX-image-2.6.15/conf.vars
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:09:31AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
The new option in Debian Installer to automatically partition using LVM
creates a system where / and most other partitions are on LVM, but /boot
is a separate real partition.
The initrd created using initramfs-tools fails to boot
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: important
After upgrade to kernel 2.6.15-1 wine 0.9.5 (deb package from winehq.org),
crossover office 4.1 and 5.0.0 stopped working: with most win32 apps, after
launch and some input (mouse or keyboard), the whole system appears
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:11, you wrote:
can you say what was the exact boot failure?
what where the last messages on the console..
SCSI, CDROM and USB have been loaded.
Begin: Mounting root file system...
Begin: Running /scripts/local-top
Done.
ALERT! /dev/mapper!Debian-root does not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
tags 347482 d-i
Bug#347482: initramfs-tools: Fails to boot with / on LVM and /boot on separate
partition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
End of message, stopping processing
retitle 347482 Does not support ! separator in /dev/mapper names
severity 347482 important
thanks
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:44, you wrote:
what were the boot args?
cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/mapper!Debian-root ro
The problem seems to be in the !. The lvm script expects / there.
A week ago we tried contacting you
Take advantage of my offer you wont be sorry
Because all lenders are different i require a few details from you so that i dont waste time going to the wrong places
http://www.www.ratezrgr8.com
Goodbye
Jasmine Mayfield
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:10AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100,
CCing the release team, since this has impact on the releasability of etch.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:00:57PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:00:57PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:53:03 +0100, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:00:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:25 +0100, Sven Luther
Whatever, i think the build
50 matches
Mail list logo
