Bug#347711: kernel: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-generic panics when pppd is run

2006-01-12 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
Package: kernel Severity: normal When I start pppd to tunnel over ssh for a vpn, the kernel panics and the pppd process is killed. Partial dmesg output follows ... CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California PPP generic driver version 2.4.2 skb_over_panic:

Re: remaining linux-2.6 RC bugs ...

2006-01-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:28:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: I think it is only a matter of someone stepping in, and porting the mips/mipsel patches and configs to the linux-2.6 tree, which should not be a very

Bug#321403: kernel 2.6.12.3 does not work either

2006-01-12 Thread Csillag Kristof
2006-01-03, k keltezéssel 20.53-kor David Schmitt ezt írta: Tomorrow, 2.6.15 will be released to unstable, since 2.6.13 should have received ACPI updates it might be interesting to test this again. I have just tested it with 2.6.15-2. It still does not work. I have attached the dmesg outputs

Bug#330225: Can you confirm this is still an issue in 2.6.15-2 ?

2006-01-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:29:13PM -0500, mike castleman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modprobe sbp2 Password: FATAL: Error inserting sbp2 (/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-powerpc64/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

Bug#330225: Can you confirm this is still an issue in 2.6.15-2 ?

2006-01-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:29:13PM -0500, mike castleman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modprobe sbp2 Password: FATAL: Error inserting sbp2 (/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-powerpc64/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.ko): Unknown

Re: remaining linux-2.6 RC bugs ...

2006-01-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:13:36AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:28:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: I think it is only a matter of someone stepping in, and porting the mips/mipsel patches

Re: remaining linux-2.6 RC bugs ...

2006-01-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Could you make an initial checkin of this, not activate it by default, but just to give some example and basis for Thiemo (or someone else) once he has time to work on it again. I'm able to merge that in the next days. Bastian --

Re: remaining linux-2.6 RC bugs ...

2006-01-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:08:28AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Could you make an initial checkin of this, not activate it by default, but just to give some example and basis for Thiemo (or someone else) once he has time to work on

Re: Troubles running 686-smp kernels (both 2.6/2.4)

2006-01-12 Thread Dererk
First, Thanks a LOT to all who answered me, and so soon, I know you have just lot of work doing what you do now, and I really appreciate that, well, all Debian Users too:-D I did what you suggested me and now I've the 2cpus running... Thanks a LOT, and keep doing what your doing,

Bug#338467: marked as done (AMD64/ATI : timer is running twice as fast as it should)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:55:26 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line AMD64/ATI : timer is running twice as fast as it should has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#343227: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp: clock running much too fast)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:57:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp: clock running much too fast has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Trouble with kernel 2.6.15

2006-01-12 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Hi, I'm using the linux kernel backport from www.backports.org, and each time I update the kernel the raid controller goes offline, having to reboot the machine. The machine is a Dell PowerEdge with a PERC3 raid controller (aacraid). I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd

Bug#343970: Intention to NMU apt-file

2006-01-12 Thread Luk Claes
Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D

Processing of initramfs-tools_0.49_i386.changes

2006-01-12 Thread Archive Administrator
initramfs-tools_0.49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initramfs-tools_0.49.dsc initramfs-tools_0.49.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.49_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

initramfs-tools_0.49_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: initramfs-tools_0.49.dsc to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.49.dsc initramfs-tools_0.49.tar.gz to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.49.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.49_all.deb to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.49_all.deb Announcing to

Re: cleaning old suggests

2006-01-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 11 January 2006 20:25, maximilian attems wrote: * boot loader: grub | lilo (= 19.1) grub is widely deployed by d-i and most actively used. lilo has almost no active dev. lilo isn't supported by xen. grub still does not support some cases

Bug#316560: Can you confirm this bug is still present in 2.6.15-2 ?

2006-01-12 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2006 à 12:55 +0100, Sven Luther a écrit : tags 316560 + moreinfo thanks Hi Benoit Can you confirm this bug : kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc: Badness in __vunmap with radeon RV250 Is still present in current 2.6.15-2 kernels in unstable ? it's not, but my display

Bug#347810: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: Doesn't autoconfig ipv6 address when a network interface goes down and up

2006-01-12 Thread Sjoerd Simons
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 Version: 2.6.15-2 Severity: normal Hi, After doing: ip link set interface down ip link set interface up The interface doesn't get an autoconfigured ipv6 address. With kernels = 2.6.15 this worked fine. To work around it i have to reload

Re: Trouble with kernel 2.6.15

2006-01-12 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote: I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd with yaird, so maybe some sysfs poking by yaird is the cause. This seems very bizarre. I just uploaded a backport of klibc and initramfs-tools, could you try to rebuilt the initrd with

Re: Trouble with kernel 2.6.15

2006-01-12 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote: I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd with yaird, so maybe some sysfs poking by yaird is the cause. This seems very bizarre. I just uploaded a backport of klibc and initramfs-tools, could

Bug#347863: Typo: cp -pf .config config.precious

2006-01-12 Thread Adam Porter
Package: linux-source-2.6.15 Version: 2.6.15-2 Severity: minor -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When running make-kpkg clean, I noticed this: == making target real_stamp_clean [new prereqs: ]== running clean test ! -f .config || cp -pf .config config.precious I imagine

Bug#311758: verified to be still present in linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp

2006-01-12 Thread Marc Lehmann
I just verified that the bug is still present in the debian configuration in the linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp kernel. -- The choice of a -==- _GNU_ ==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann ---==---(_)__ __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED]