On Monday 30 January 2006 03:29, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Wouldn't it then be possible then to drop D-I support for 2.4 and ask
user to install the old kernel, if needed after the installation? At
least if supporting 2.4 for D-I is getting to complicate...
Switching from 2.4 to 2.6 (and vice
How are you, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We spoke a few days ago and I'd like to confirm everything now.
Please go over the information below and let me know if you have any questions.
www.queenla.com/am/
We are accepting your form. Your status has been accepted.
We need to confirm your details one
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:24:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
I have cloned the installation report to #350482 and reassigned that to
the linux-2.6 source package for this issue.
The user confirmed this issue is still there for 2.6.15. I'll leave it to
kernel maintainers to determine if this
Hi all,
I am mailing to close this bug. Some time ago I found out what the real
cause of it all was: a faulty memory chip. At boot time it checked out
fine, and even during operations it faulted only in 5% of the cases or
so. Intense runs of memtest86+ revealed the problem.
I removed the chip
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 23:18 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
Even though 2.4 is moving very slowly nowadays (mostly security
updates,
very seldom new drivers are including), this is more work than needed,
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:15:29 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295657: EXT3 on RAID problems in all 2.6-smp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi Holger,
thanks for raising this important issue and sorry for being slow to reply.
I think that I agree with pretty much everything you wrote, so I won't
reiterate that here. However, I'd like to take the opportunity to
clarify my position with regards to 2.4 in Etch.
When I first became
On the topic of Security fixes and 2.4's upstream. Dann, myself, and
all others involved endeavour to push any patches we find that are
missing from upstream to the relevant parties. This includes 2.4 and
2.6, security and non-security patches. Marcelo has specifically asked
vendors (and others)
Ok, I just tried with having only the 'skge' module loaded since boot.
Once again, ethernet died.
So, the summary is:
2.6.12, w/ sk98lin: Works
2.6.12 does not have skge.
2.6.15 w/ sk98lin skge (yes, you can load both[0]): Fails
2.6.15 w/ sk98lin: Fails
2.6.15 w/ skge: Fails
where fails means
9 matches
Mail list logo
