reassign 352434 initramfs-tools
thanks
On Feb 11, Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
,
| tmpfstmpfs253M 112K 252M 1% /dev
`
This system has 512 MB RAM, and $tmpfs_size is still 10M in the udev
init script.
initramfs-tools creates it. It should use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 352434 initramfs-tools
Bug#352434: tmpfs for /dev is ram/2
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `initramfs-tools'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
|--== Junichi Uekawa writes:
Ah, ok, so this would be the same situation as the xen or vserver patches,
which we already have subarchitectures (maybe not very well named).
I would counsel you to get a svn checkout of the linux-2.6 package, and
investigate into what Bastian did for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 351623 critical
Bug#351623: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: breaks reiserfs
Severity set to `critical'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
If other Custom Debian Distributions need
their own kernels, including everything in one single source package
could turn to be a not very scalable approach.
It is quite easy to modify the linux-2.6
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:30:58AM -0500, Martin Stolle wrote:
Get random permission denied as root. It seems like all the extended
attributes on reiserfs are badly/poorly initialized? Did they get
changed? Or maybe they were ignored before and are suddenly used now?
Yes, the one stable
It's currently not possible to build linux-2.6 with testing, because
2.6.15-4 build-depends on kernel-package (= 10.029), but testing has
9.008.4. Looks like the testing scripts don't consider build-depends.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:33:04PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
It's currently not possible to build linux-2.6 with testing, because
2.6.15-4 build-depends on kernel-package (= 10.029), but testing has
9.008.4. Looks like the testing scripts don't consider build-depends.
This is indeed
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
As said, you should build not a new flavour, but a new subarch, in a way
similar of the work bastian blank did with the vserver patches. I am not sure
this infrastructure is fully functional, but it is the way these things should
be
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 08:48:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
As said, you should build not a new flavour, but a new subarch, in a way
similar of the work bastian blank did with the vserver patches. I am not
sure
this
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:20:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 08:48:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The problem is that it does not scale. I don't think we can build more
than around 10 image for i386.
Why not ? i386 is supposed to have nice and fast hardware, so this
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:53:31PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:20:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 08:48:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The problem is that it does not scale. I don't think we can build more
than around 10 image for i386.
Hi,
I'll cc debian-multimedia, since I didn't notice agnula lists were subscriber
only.
Also, we don't need to rebuild all flavours, only a few ones for select
arches
and flavours.
What do you mean?
the idea is to build a few flavours with the -RT patches, not all images, the
- Forwarded message from Wouter Lueks [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:45:06 +0100
From: Wouter Lueks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Unable to boot with debian kernel 2.6.15
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's been some time since I updated my
|--== Sven Luther writes:
SL As said, you should build not a new flavour, but a new subarch, in a way
SL similar of the work bastian blank did with the vserver patches. I am not
sure
SL this infrastructure is fully functional, but it is the way these things
should
SL be handled.
Ok, I
Because i find this patchset quite useful , i suggest the
iphitus-patchset and the grsec-patches to be added to the debian-kernel.
They contain acpi-patches , drivers for the centrino-chipset , suspend2,
randomized ports, and more . And the author made sure that they work
together.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:28:34PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
|--== Sven Luther writes:
SL As said, you should build not a new flavour, but a new subarch, in a way
SL similar of the work bastian blank did with the vserver patches. I am
not sure
SL this infrastructure is fully
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:42:57PM +0100, Joschka Sulzer wrote:
Because i find this patchset quite useful , i suggest the
iphitus-patchset and the grsec-patches to be added to the debian-kernel.
They contain acpi-patches , drivers for the centrino-chipset , suspend2,
randomized ports, and
|--== Sven Luther writes:
SL Well, the lack of human ressources will show of over the months upto the
SL release, and the years that this code base is active, so we need more
than a
SL momentarily commitment :)
Well, I believe that myself plus some other good boys from the AGNULA
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-4
Tags: patch
Kernel versions 2.6.15 do not have support for suspend and resume for
SATA devices, though I did not have problem doing RAM suspend with
2.6.12-10 on my toshiba satellite laptop with ICH6M SATA controller.
Dilemma is now 2.6.12 with
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:08:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:30:58AM -0500, Martin Stolle wrote:
Get random permission denied as root. It seems like all the extended
attributes on reiserfs are badly/poorly initialized? Did they get
changed? Or maybe they were
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.51
Severity: minor
mild_panic ${initramfs} was been altered. Cannot update.
^
s/was/has/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22 matches
Mail list logo
