Hi,
The linux-image packages do not depend on udev itself, I guess that udev
was pulled in due to the fact that initramfs-tools depends on it. You can,
however, use an alternative initrd generator, yaird, to generate initrd.
Yaird does not depend on udev, so that might be the option you are lo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354325 upstream
Bug#354325: linux-source-2.6.15: 2.6.15-7 fails to compile (cx22700 issue)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 354325 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6179
Bug#354325: linux-source-2.6.15: 2.6.15-7 fa
tags 354325 upstream
forwarded 354325 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6179
severity 354325 normal
thanks
Hi,
I've reported the bug upstream, so tagging appropriately. Submitter has
notified, that he was able to work around the problem by setting
CONFIG_I2C to 'y', so dropping severi
Hi,
Please check whether the information in bug 338467 [0] applies in your
case. If it does, you might need to run a newer kernel and use the
workaround posted there.
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/338467
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: h
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:26:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line LSI/Megaraid RAID controller
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
The bottom line problem is that I'm not able to build a kernel with the
driver for this card. Basically, I can't find it listed in the
configuration tool (make xconfig). The following is a bit of the
history and background information.
I have an old Sony VAIO laptop with a 3Com PCMCIA ethern
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:31:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352878: 2.6.15-6 breaks on Thinkpad R52 (SATA issues?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote:
> 1: array_acpid~=: not found
> eval: 1: array_udev-helper=udev: not found
> eval: 1: Syntax error: Bad substitutiousbcore: registered new driver usbfs
> n
> eval: 1: arrausbcore: registered new driver hub
> y_acpid~=: not fFusion MPT base driver 3.03.04
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.53c.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.53c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.53c.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.53c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.53c_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.53c_all.deb
Announcing to debia
initramfs-tools_0.53c_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.53c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.53c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.53c_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Monday 06 March 2006 21:52, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I recently updated to linux-image-2.6.15-1, and now I want to remove
> linux-image-2.6.14-2, but the postinst hangs reading from a pipe
> during the call to purge(). I'm presently in state "Config-files",
> and I don't know how to debug it furt
Hello debian-kernel,
I recently updated to linux-image-2.6.15-1, and now I want to remove
linux-image-2.6.14-2, but the postinst hangs reading from a pipe
during the call to purge(). I'm presently in state "Config-files",
and I don't know how to debug it further. Surely the package should
be pur
[ please don't drop your bug report from cc. ]
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006, Gary Dale wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:28:22PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I recently decided to try Etch on my laptop computer (IBM Thinkpad
> >>A22e). The dist-upgrade from Sarge
* Antti Honkela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-06 21:17]:
> I will not object if the bug is closed as unreproducible or something
> (preferably after the proposed fix has been included).
There are 3 people who reported similar problems: you, me and another
one. The fix works for me. If it works fo
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Sorry it too so long to reply for you. A patch is available now that
> will most likely see the problem you've been experiencing. Can you
> please recompile your kernel with that patch and tell me if it works.
Unfortunately I no longer have the mac
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53
The attached patch adds s390 specific modules.
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
diff -urN initramfs-tools-0.53/hook-functions
initramfs-tools-0.53.1/hook-functions
--- initr
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Three problems: no installation of module; no loading of "linear" module in md;
using mdrun in scripts/local-top/md give incorrect md modules.
The hook function "manual_add_modules" uses modprobe to find the actual module
to
Bastian Blank schrieb:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:53:45PM +0100, Soeren D. Schulze wrote:
This is what ksymoops on syslog after the reboot gives me, do not
hesitate to ask if you want any further information.
Don't use ksymoops with 2.6 kernels. Show the real log.
Bastian
OK...
Mar 6
* Antti Honkela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-05 22:33]:
> After upgrade from 2.4 series to kernel 2.6.8, my Tulip NIC
> (Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21041 [Tulip Pass 3] (rev 21))
> is autodetected to use module de2104x. Unfortunately the module does
> not work at all and causes a kernel
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:53:45PM +0100, Soeren D. Schulze wrote:
> This is what ksymoops on syslog after the reboot gives me, do not
> hesitate to ask if you want any further information.
Don't use ksymoops with 2.6 kernels. Show the real log.
Bastian
--
Vulcans never bluff.
Hello,
about an hour ago, I attached to my old server box and noticed that
Emacs had crashed with a SIGSEGV. This usually means that there is
something wrong with the system, so I checked dmesg. And indeed, there
were some Oops. I am afraid I have not been able to do a lot of
diagnostics b
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 06:26:52PM -0500, Andrew Burns wrote:
> I have been fighting the same problem for several months now and only
> today solved the problem.
>
> My machine is an emachines model T6212 and has a ATI graphics card as
> well SIS network card. I mention this because on a number o
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:17:33AM -0800, Debian Installer wrote:
> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> override file for the following file(s):
>
> kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is
> extra, override says optional.
> kern
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is
extra, override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra,
ove
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.15-8_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.15-8_powerpc.d
linux-2.6_2.6.15-8_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.15-8.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.15-8.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.15_2.6.15-8_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.15_2.6.15-8_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.15_2.6.15-8_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.15_2.6.15-8_al
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2006 04:17:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330225: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.15-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi folks
I just uploaded 2.6.15-8. It fixes two security bugs.
Bastian
--
I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life.
-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi
I have found the same DMA problem in all versions of
this kernel linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 (2.6.15-1 till 2.6.15-7)
and also with linux-image-2.6.15-1-486/2.6.15-7
The DMA with linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 works without any problem on the
same machine
(82801DB (ICH4) chipset)
regards
Tibor
--
T
Package: linux-source-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-4
If you select the new megaraid drivers using "make menuconfig", it includes
the appropriate definitions in the .config file : MEGARAID_MM=y and
MEGARAID_MBOX=y.
However, the makefile is done in such a way that it requires that a symbol
MEGARAID_NEWG
30 matches
Mail list logo
