good morning surprise today :)
quick notice that 2.6.16-1 is planned for today.
the archs which don't jump in quickly,
have subsequent chances for -2, -3, ..
regards
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:31:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#354334: udev removal should remake initrd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hello,
we branched 2.6.16 for sid right away, so the work should take place in
dists/sid/linux-2.6 and be applied to the trunk branch, too.
The reason for this immediate branch are the xen images, which are
excluded from release for now.
All architectures but amd64, i386 and s390 have outdated
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
My system freezes while it is idle with the 2.6 series kernel. It is
OK with the 2.4 series kernel, though.
The system totally locks up and does not respond to any
What exactly do the debian packages in the repository have that isn't
the same as doing a download and build with make-kpkg?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:15:01PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I propose a deadline for changes at 16:00 UTC on Mar 21st, so we can
upload in time for dinstall.
The 2.6.16 orig tar can be get from
http://194.39.182.145/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.16.orig.tar.gz
The md5sum is:
this bug is still there when the initramfs was created in 2.4.27
(without udev runnning)
--
'Tis better to plumb the depths of unity than forever scratch the
surface of variety. If you ask me what I came to do in this world,
I, an artist, I will answer you: I am here to live out loud.
-- Emile
Dear all,
My name is Joaquim Duran. I've installed at home a catalan debian
based distribution named 'xarnoppix'. I installed the distribuition to
the HD, with kernel 2.6.12 at /dev/hdb8 partition (this is a test
partition). The kernel was able to mount the root file system
/dev/hdb8, with ext3
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:44:07AM +, Bastian Blank wrote:
Author: waldi
Date: Mon Mar 20 09:44:06 2006
New Revision: 6224
snipp
Log:
Revert r6222 and r6223.
i'm against this aggressive workstyle.
you enforce in an unilateral manner an svn policy,
which has never been accorded nor
* hanasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 07:36]:
What exactly do the debian packages in the repository have that isn't
the same as doing a download and build with make-kpkg?
Small fixes for various architectures and other bugs, mostly.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To
* Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 12:15]:
All architectures but amd64, i386 and s390 have outdated configs.
Please have a look at your architecture, and fix it.
Done for arm/armeb and mips/mipsel. From my point of view, 2.6.16 is
ready for upload.
--
Martin Michlmayr
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:24:35PM +0100, Joaquim Duran Comas wrote:
My name is Joaquim Duran. I've installed at home a catalan debian
based distribution named 'xarnoppix'. I installed the distribuition to
the HD, with kernel 2.6.12 at /dev/hdb8 partition (this is a test
partition). The
* maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 15:26]:
Log:
Revert r6222 and r6223.
i'm against this aggressive workstyle.
I agree. Waldi, can you please a) stop reverting stuff without
talking to anyone and b) explain _why_ you'd like to revert stuff.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53c
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I just upgraded a Compaq ProLiant DL360 with Debian/etch to use the
2.6.15-1-686-smp kernel, and ran into a problem in the process. The
RAID controller module, cpqarray, was not included in the initrd by
default, and
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.15-7bpo1
Severity: normal
Yo!
I'm experiencing hangs at boot with 'hda: lost interrupt' every few seconds
being the last signs of life as soon as the ahci module is loaded (not sure
about the exact boot sequence, but I think udev loads these
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
tags 357980 pending
Bug#357980: initramfs-tools: Should include cpqarray module by default?
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
tags 355235 pending
Bug#355235: initramfs-tools: file name illegal in variable names
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.8-2-686
Hello. I hope this is the right adress for this 'bug-report', if not i am sorry
for the inconvenience.
On my debian system (3.0R1) the default-loaded RTC (/dev/rtc)-Driver is
genrtc.ko, wich fails on ioctl-calls for periodic-interrupts (RTC_IRQP_SET)
with
Hello
After re-reading my mail i considerd sending some example code, wich shouldn
work with:
Kernel 2.6.8-2-686 and module genrtc.ko loaded
but works with:
Kernel 2.6.8-2-686 and module rtc.ko loaded.
Maybe this is a general kernel issue, or an issue with my machine. If so, i am
again
* Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 20:04]:
Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
when I try and use the tape drive on my machine. New versions not only
Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16?
(will be uploaded tomorrow).
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16?
(will be uploaded tomorrow).
2.6.15, yes. I'll check 2.6.16 when it hits unstable (I'm guessing,
though I still need to test, that the ide-tape cleanup in 2.6.9 borked it)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 19:35 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
I've looked at the initramfs image and tried to trace through
execution by inspection (I'm not at the machine). I may be off base,
but here's what I noticed. In short, it looks as if the root
parameter of /dev/evms/newroot in lilo.conf is
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 15:26]:
Log:
Revert r6222 and r6223.
i'm against this aggressive workstyle.
I agree. Waldi, can you please a) stop reverting stuff without
talking to anyone and b) explain _why_ you'd like to
23 matches
Mail list logo
