Christophe Chisogne wrote:
You're not alone. It's known kernel bug (at least since 01/2005) and I just
filed
a bug [1] against the linux-image-2.6.16-1-686.
The work around : compile a new kernel without the options that cause the bug.
(partition type detection should start by dos-like partitio
Patrick Borgschulte wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.16-3
> This error occured when i tried to upgrade my system today with the
> "aptitude update && aptitude dist-upgrade" command
Confirmed - same problem here; also on a k7 box.
> I took a look at the file i think that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 311758 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6295
Bug#311758: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686-smp: network interfaces down => machine
needs hard reboot
Bug#323860: unregister_netdevice: waiting for vpn0 to become free. Usage count
= 23
Bug#33
forwarded 311758 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6295
thanks
Hi Marc,
Based on your notes I was able to reproduce the bug with vanilla kernel.
I've submitted the bug upstream, you can view it (and add your comments)
at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6295
I will try to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 359624 linux-2.6
Bug#359624: linux-image: Kernel OOPS in 'ide-scsi' when trying to write a CD
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Hi folks,
I have to modify my initial bug report: initramfs-tools did
not actually attempt to take over a yaird generated ramfs.
Normally, on this machine, I need yaird generated initramfs,
but had not set yaird as the default, since I had no other ramdisk
generator. The seque
Hi,
I believe that no matter who generated the initrd, the upgrade of an
initrd-generating tool should *not* trigger the initrd rebuild (if I
understand it correctly, that's what currently happening). Maks, can you
please explain why it is useful? If there is an initrd, presumably a
working o
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #327355
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ide-tape: hdd <-> ht0: Seagate STT2A rev 8A51
ide-tape: hdd <-> ht0: 1000KBps, 6*54kB buffer, 9720kB pipeline, 110ms tDSC, DMA
Badness in dma_map_sg at include/asm/dma-mapping.h:47
[] ide_build_sglist+
severity 358397 grave
thanks
On 26 Mar 2006, maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 358397 important
> stop
>
> hello Manoj,
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> The package fails to install (failure to check if the image is
>> modifiable), is the first part. Failure to install makes
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Is it a laptop? The first impression is that it is some kind of ACPI
problem. Could you please try some combinations of boot options
Well, I just tried to debug it, only to discover that the machine does
not wish to crash tonight, no matter what options I give it. Even
Same experience with error in line 55 of
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs-kpkg on up-to-date Sid system
Relevant output from apt-get dist-upgrade:
---
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 (2.6.16-3) ...
Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link
/lib/modules/2.6.1
On 26 Mar 2006, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:56:15 +0200
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> The init ram fs was not created using initramfs-tools, and yet it
>>> tries to recreate the initramfs on upgrade, without asking the
>>> admin, which is an problem in i
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7
Version: 2.6.16-3
Error Message:
Richte linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 ein (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs-kpkg: line 55: supported_host_version: unbound
variable
mkinitra
Same problem for me. I rebooted to my existing 2.6.15-8 (never trying
2.6.16-3) and I had no problems. I removed 2.6.16-3 completely and
tried re-installing it, but got the same problem in line 55 of
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs-kpkg.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Severity: serious
Some minutes ago i have run aptitude to update my Debian Sid and the
installation of the latest kernel has failed with the following messages:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 22:19 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> One of the evms developers suggested checking if lilo was properly
> patched, and that the behavior I saw suggested it wasn't. Debian's
> lilo sounds as if it has the right patch, but maybe it doesn't. Also
> I need to compare the way I pass
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: important
Upgrading today fails with the following transcript:
dawn# aptitude upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task de
tags 348147 moreinfo
thanks
hello david,
thanks a lot for your cryptowork.
based on it i nicely boot cryptoroot,
with this some rough edges, but works out with passphrase.
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006, David Härdeman wrote:
> I've attached an updated version of the previous patch. The changes are:
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348147 moreinfo
Bug#348147: Add support for cryptoroot
Tags were: patch
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
FYI: The status of the kernel-latest-2.4-sparc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 42
Current version: 42sarge1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more infor
FYI: The status of the kernel-latest-2.4-s390 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.4.27-1
Current version: 2.4.27-1sarge1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:05:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
>
> Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
>
>
>
> Segmentation fault message during boot. It apperas here
I don't see anything that points to a kernel problem. Can you try
regenerating your initrd and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 358816 359180
Bug#358816: Loading snd-powermac causes an oops
Bug#359180: linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc: oops while loading snd-powermac
Merged 358816 359180.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:45:46 +0100
> Bas van Schaik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>That sounds like you try to build within /usr/src itself, rather than
>>>just referring to that location for kernel headers and do the actual
>>>build somewhere else.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Hmmm
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern
linux-2.6_2.6.16-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.16_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-1-486_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-486_2.6.16-3_i386.deb
linux-image-486_2.6.16-3_i386.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2006-03-27 18:15, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 16:58, Thomas Jahns wrote:
> Please comment. But with non-working PS/2 keyboard and non-working
> /etc/fstab for both kernel version, the 2.6.16 image is pretty
> worthless to me at t
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
Segmentation fault message during boot. It apperas here
...
hdd: ATAPI 48X CDROM, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
Segmentation fault
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
...
Since I have s
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-3_powerpc.deb: package says priority is
extra, override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-3_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra,
ove
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-3_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-3_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-3_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.16-3_powerpc.d
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:17:48 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358752: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:17:48 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358391: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:17:48 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358709: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
linux-2.6_2.6.16-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.16-3.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.16-3.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-3_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-3_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-3_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.16_2.6.16-3_al
On Monday 27 March 2006 16:58, Thomas Jahns wrote:
> Please comment. But with non-working PS/2 keyboard and non-working
> /etc/fstab for both kernel version, the 2.6.16 image is pretty
> worthless to me at this moment.
You could try using the rescue mode [1] of the Etch Beta 2 release [2] of
Debi
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Occasionally the kernel broadcasts a message such as:
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Mon Mar 27 14:19:59 2006 ...
localhost kernel: Bad page state at free_hot_cold_page (in pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2006-03-15 17:12, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Could you retry with the upcoming 2.6.16 which is currently in
> preparation and includes support for mips/ip22? (As found in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2006/01/msg00050.html )
I've tried 2.6
On Monday 27 March 2006 17:21, Sven Luther wrote:
> with something like 18 hours of interval between them, which i believe
If anybody can tell me where these 18 hours come from, I'll be happy to
consider apologizing.
I replied two times on the same subject as there was both a thread on
d-boot a
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:12:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Just for the record.
>
> On Monday 27 March 2006 16:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> > And Frans, you are an unfeeling bastard, i personally asked you
> > yesterday to not pick on me like you are doing now, since i was facing
> > another strong
Just for the record.
On Monday 27 March 2006 16:43, Sven Luther wrote:
> And Frans, you are an unfeeling bastard, i personally asked you
> yesterday to not pick on me like you are doing now, since i was facing
> another strong crisis with my mother yesterday, and really didn't need
> such bullshit
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:23:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 27 March 2006 00:42, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> > (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this
> > should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly)
>
> This is not an initramfs-tools problem, b
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.59.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.59.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.59_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59_all.deb
Announcing to debian-deve
initramfs-tools_0.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.59.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.59.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.59_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:32:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350875: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:32:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358354: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:32:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358632: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:32:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358740: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:32:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358371: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Andrew Moise wrote:
> When I plug in a flash stick that my roommate has filled with stuff
> using his Macintosh computer, it doesn't work. Windows reads the
> stick. Here's what happens when I put in the stick:
> (...)
> Mar 20 21:01:24 localhost vmunix: sda: [CUMANA/ADFS] sda1<5>sd 0:0:0:0:
I forgot an important URL in my bug report : it's where I found the solution
to my problem. Here it is.
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4054] Linux partition table reading
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0501.2/0543.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 358512 module-assistant
Bug#358512: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp: kernel-headers seems to contain
unconfigured kernel
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp' to
`module-assistant'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
reassign 358512 module-assistant
thanks
#include
* Jurij Smakov [Thu, Mar 23 2006, 09:42:39AM]:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> >#include
> >* Jurij Smakov [Wed, Mar 22 2006, 06:43:28PM]:
> >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Yes, version.h is missing. I told Se
Package: kernel-image-2.6-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 103sarge1
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
The iptables command fails after the security update
The ip_tables and the iptable_filter load without problem.
I choose the 'grave' severity level because firewalls won't start or be
defi
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-2
Severity: important
If I use the standard unstable kernel packages (linux-image-2.6.{15,16}-1-686),
I can't use my USB key. There are messages in syslog like the line below, then
a bunch of "Buffer I/O error on device sda1".
"sda: [CUMA
Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:46:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358153: testing (etch): cannot boot on software raid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:34:17AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There are some possible fixes for that problem, any of them needs a
> rebuild of any binaries in the scripts directory:
- Build as a seperate package (reinvent updated version of
kernel-kbuild-2.6).
This solution needs a differen
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:55:53AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> the major fe is the old evms major nr. afaik evms switched to newer 117.
> no idea if the libdevmapper patch from lilo got updated in debian?
evms have no own major in 2.6 as it uses devmapper and md for the work.
devmapper have
57 matches
Mail list logo
