Hi,
Please have a look at bug#350407 and help weed out if it is really an
RC bug (policy 10.7.4) for the kernels to mess
with /etc/kernel-img.conf without a single package "owning" that
configuration file.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Web
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:00:08PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
2.6.16.10 is scheduled for tomorrow. More than one upload per day is not
good for the buildd network.
I would say that more than one u
At 11:36 AM 4/16/2006 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Harry Coin wrote:
> I suspect this problem occurs in all cases where the bios 'boot' device
> is not the eventual final root device and
> the root device discovery / setup process takes some time to settle (usb
> storage
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-9
Severity: normal
After an APM suspend/resume cycle, the intel8x0 audio device thinks it's
working normally, but no sound comes out.
This is a regression, as it did once work [long ago, it's been a while since
I checked; sorry can't provide anoth
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8
Version: Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm
Severity: important
Tried installing linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8 into a pbuilder chroot of
sid, I think the kernel should require debconf?
# apt-get install linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8
[snip]
Unpacking
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:48:57PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.16.10 was just released, hence I'd like to upload 2.6.16-10 as
> soon as possible (tomorrow), to fix the FTBFS on alpha.
I want to check the powerpc config files tomorrow morning, there is some
trouble on pegasos i
Hi,
2.6.16.10 was just released, hence I'd like to upload 2.6.16-10 as
soon as possible (tomorrow), to fix the FTBFS on alpha.
Any objections?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 364637 linux-2.6
Bug#364637: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 364637 [powerpc64] boot hangs at 'Trying to im_free nonexistent area
> (d800820d7000)
Bug#364637: (no subject)
Changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 364632 linux-2.6
Bug#364632: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 364632 [powerpc64] Error inserting module sbp2 during installation
Bug#364632: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Sto
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 10:34 -0500, David McGiven wrote:
> Dear Debian users,
>
> I'm using Debian Sarge in one of my machines. I wanted to install a newer
> kernel (Sarge comes with 2.6.8).
>
> Instead of using the kernel.org vanilla kernel source package, I decided
> that using the debian source
- Forwarded message from "Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#364632: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:40:17 -0400
From: "Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTEC
Oh my god. 1 hour wondering why ... just because of that stupid mistake.
It works now.
Thanks a lot Jurij.
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, David McGiven wrote:
>
> > cp /tmp/boot/config-2.6.15-1-686-smp /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15
>
> This should be
>
> cp /tmp/boot/config
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, David McGiven wrote:
cp /tmp/boot/config-2.6.15-1-686-smp /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15
This should be
cp /tmp/boot/config-2.6.15-1-686-smp /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/.config
After that make oldconfig should work fine.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov
Dear Debian users,
I'm using Debian Sarge in one of my machines. I wanted to install a newer
kernel (Sarge comes with 2.6.8).
Instead of using the kernel.org vanilla kernel source package, I decided
that using the debian source package from testing would be better.
I downloaded it from :
http:/
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:25:38AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
>
> > hi all,
> >
> > I looked at an old bug regarding my scsi hardware:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:00:43PM +0100, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6-686
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I looked at an old bug regarding my scsi hardware:
>
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:00:43PM +0100, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> > Version: 2.6.15-8
> > Followup-For: Bug #348782
> [...]
> > debian 2.6.15
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686
Version: 2.4.27-10sarge2
Severity: important
hi all,
I tried to install kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686 yesterday. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364584
now, 2.4.27-2 doesn't boot anymore;
here is part of the boot process (I copy by hand)
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686
Version: 2.4.27-10sarge2
Severity: important
hi all,
$ cat /etc/debian_version
testing/unstable
$ sudo dpkg --configure kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686 (2.4.27-10sarge2) ...
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: MODULES=dep cannot be done due
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:24:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Don't have the hardware anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
hi all,
I looked at an old bug regarding my scsi hardware:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:00:43PM +0100, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.15-8
> Followup-For: Bug #348782
[...]
> debian 2.6.15-8 doesn't resolve:
>
> I have a scsi tower (2*dd, cdrom reader,
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-hp_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linu
[sent again, this time with the proper list address]
First of all, please use the BTS instead of responding privately. I
have attached your response, and this is posted to the BTS as well.
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:54:20 -0400 Jack Carroll wrote:
> > It is possible, I believe, to blacklist a modul
22 matches
Mail list logo
