Re: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.

2006-06-27 Thread maximilian attems
hello svenl, On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote: I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5. The result is as follows : 2.6.16 + modular fan control - airplan noise level. 2.6.17 + modular fan control - still noisy, but

Re: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: hello svenl, On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote: I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5. The result is as follows : 2.6.16 + modular fan control

Re: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.

2006-06-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: hello svenl, On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sven Luther wrote: I have been experimenting with 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and builtin or modular THERM_PM72 on my XServer G5.

Bug#375624: initramfs-tools: Typo in panic() in scripts/functions. Fails to set prompt.

2006-06-27 Thread Tim Phipps
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.60 Severity: minor /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions has a panic() function to spawn an emergency or debug shell. It does so with this line FS1='(initramfs) ' /bin/sh /dev/console /dev/console 21 FS1 should be PS1 if you want to set the

Re: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.

2006-06-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:03:04 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: did you check it they get loaded by the initramfs? please tell which fan and i2c modules need to be

Re: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:01:52AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:03:04 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:47:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: did you check it they get

Re: svn games

2006-06-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:32:47PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to bring the following recent svn commits to the attention of the team. I have made a commit r6880 in Saturday morning (Pacific time): Switch to gcc-4.1 for sparc, because it works (tm). This was after the

Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: [stuff both targeted at lists and personally] Please, Sven, respect the Debian code of conduct regarding mailinglists [1]: When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they

Scheduling 2.6.17-2

2006-06-27 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks I'd like to schedule the upload of 2.6.17-2 for tomorrow, wednesday. It fixes the sparc and mipsel build. Bastian -- The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank. -- Scotty signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Scheduling 2.6.17-2

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:06:47PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks I'd like to schedule the upload of 2.6.17-2 for tomorrow, wednesday. I need to at least fix the mkvmlinuz stuff which was forgotten last time, and ideally i would like to get a good solution for the modular fancontrol

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:13:11 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:04:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: [stuff both targeted at lists and personally] Please, Sven, respect the Debian code of conduct regarding

Bug#375645: linux-2.6: [powerpc] mkvmlinuz support files are missing in 2.6.17-1.

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Luther
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.17-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Well, 2.6.17-1 was missing the mkvmlinuz support patch. I am now fixing this issue, for 2.6.17-2, and thus this is a place-holder bug to get a number for the changelog :) Friendly, Sven Luther --

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:13:11 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:04:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: [stuff both targeted at lists and

Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies

2006-06-27 Thread Hans
Package: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 Severity: critical -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 Locale:

Processed: Re: Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies

2006-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 375647 linux-2.6 Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `linux-2.6'. forcemerge 375432 375647 Bug#375432: One package is missing Bug#375647:

Processed: Re: Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies

2006-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 375647 linux-2.6 Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Warning: Unknown package 'linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8' Bug reassigned from package `linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8' to `linux-2.6'.

Processed: fixed?

2006-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 352208 linux-2.6 Bug#352208: segfault when doing ifconfig up Bug reassigned from package `bcm43xx-source' to `linux-2.6'. reassign 360708 linux-2.6 Bug#360708: bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc: bcm43* card is only capable to receive date Bug

Bug#360708: marked as done (bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc: bcm43* card is only capable to receive date)

2006-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:40:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:08 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: Bah, whatever, you know i asked for the creation of the debian-kernel mailing list, should i then change the code of conduct for it or something such ? I was unaware that you invented this list. And it really is of no interest to me.

Processed: Re: Bug#360708: marked as done (bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc: bcm43* card is only capable to receive date)

2006-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 360708 Bug#360708: bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc: bcm43* card is only capable to receive date Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#375671: update-initramfs has nothing to do without -k

2006-06-27 Thread martin f krafft
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.65b Severity: normal Per Max' request: mdadm:~# uname -r 2.6.17-1-686 mdadm:~# update-initramfs -u -v Nothing to do, exiting. mdadm:~# update-initramfs -u -v -k$(uname -r) [this works] mdadm:~# sh -x update-initramfs -u + STATEDIR=/var/lib/initramfs-tools +

Bug#358617: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: Seems like we have a duplicate

2006-06-27 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 Version: 2.6.15-8 Followup-For: Bug #358617 It seems that this bug is a duplicate of #347468 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to

Bug#360708: marked as done (bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc: bcm43* card is only capable to receive date)

2006-06-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
reopen 360708 thanks err, of course this shouldn't have been closed. *sigh* Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: [...] From: Emil Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc: bcm43* card is only capable to receive date

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:08 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: Bah, whatever, you know i asked for the creation of the debian-kernel mailing list, should i then change the code of conduct for it or something such ? I was unaware

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Why don't you set M-F-T to the right thing like others do ? I agree with Sven. If you don't like it, either set up procmail so you don't receive duplicates, or set Mail-Followup-To header. Anything else, and you're just being

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:57:42 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:08 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: Bah, whatever, you know i asked for the creation of the debian-kernel mailing list, should i then change the

Bug#360708: closed by Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] (fixed?)

2006-06-27 Thread Emil Nowak
On 2006-06-27 (Tue), at 06:51:33 Rene Engelhard wrote: are those bugs still present in Linux 2.6.17-1 (which contains bcm43xx now)? If not, please close. wow - It works on 2.6.17 thanks for info. However this was bug about bcm43xx-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc not linux-image-2.6.17, so I'm not

kernels in etch and compatibility with modules packages

2006-06-27 Thread Ian Campbell
[Please CC as I am not subscribed.] Hi Guys, I am the maintainer of the IVTV driver packages. The IVTV upstream have a scheme where the 0.6.x releases are for use with the 2.6.16 kernels, 0.7.x goes with 2.6.17 etc. There is an older 0.4.x series which works with 2.6.15 and earlier. I have

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 27 June 2006 15:26, Kyle McMartin wrote: I agree with Sven. If you don't like it, either set up procmail so you don't receive duplicates, or set Mail-Followup-To header. You might agree, but it's against the code of conduct for the debian mailing lists:

Re: Reply only to list! (Was: G5 fan control and official debian kernels.)

2006-06-27 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:14:55PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: You might agree, but it's against the code of conduct for the debian mailing lists: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.html#codeofconduct (#9 in that list) Be liberal in what you accept, and strict in what you send! Then

Bug#375729: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686: system crash on resume from suspend to memory

2006-06-27 Thread Martin Waitz
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686 Version: 2.6.17-1 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hoi :) with 2.6.17-1, my laptop (Dell Latitude D600) does not correctly come back out of suspend to memory any more. It works with 2.6.16-2. The console shows a part of a

Bug#375730: Page writeback broken after resume

2006-06-27 Thread Peter Lundkvist
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 Version: 2.6.16-15 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, Page writeback together with swsusp has been broken in 2.6 for some time. After a suspend/resume the background page writeback is usually not working. This can be seen by looking at /proc/vmstat: nr_dirty

Re: kernels in etch and compatibility with modules packages

2006-06-27 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Ian Campbell [Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:07:59 +0100]: [Please CC as I am not subscribed.] [Added -release in case some more comments are needed.] I am the maintainer of the IVTV driver packages. The IVTV upstream have a scheme where the 0.6.x releases are for use with the 2.6.16 kernels, 0.7.x

Position to external modules packages

2006-06-27 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, I'm one of maintainers of spca5xx drivers for Debian and try to be update with kernel packages as possible. Checking what's missing today I noticed that we hadn't yet upload a new version of the package against 2.6.17 but also I'm not sure if I should to do it too. Since now we have

Bug#348782: ipw2200 problem solved with 2.6.16-2

2006-06-27 Thread Martin Wilck
I apologize for having been so silent. The ipw2200 problem is gone (hasn't been reproducable) since I upgraded to kernel 2.6.16-2. As far as it regards my initial bu report, the bug can be closed. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#375779: linux-manual-2.6.17: Empty manual pages

2006-06-27 Thread Sam Morris
Package: linux-manual-2.6.17 Version: 2.6.17-1 Severity: normal The following man pages are empty: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41 2006-06-22 12:48 writing_usb_driver.9.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 2006-06-22 12:48 kernel-hacking.9.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 2006-06-22 12:48

Bug#375786: initramfs-tools: Volume group not activated with LILO

2006-06-27 Thread Christian Weeks
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.65b Severity: important Tags: patch Hi. It appears that the new volume group activation code doesn't work with LILO. The culprit is that LILO's fe00 is substituted for /dev/root. I have attached a patch that should fix this behaviour to be correct. I have

Re: svn games

2006-06-27 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Bastian Blank wrote: As I said, an abiname bump is a last resort solution and needs to be coordinated. Frederik and I currently coordinate the uploads and other core changes. So I think we have the right to veto such problematic changes. I'm not interested in the

Bug#307327: Please enable PowerBook HID config to make last-gen PowerBook keyboards work

2006-06-27 Thread Eric Dorland
Pretty, pretty please apply this patch (or something similar) to make page up/page down keys work on the last and second to last generation of PowerBook G4. --- debian/arch/powerpc/config.powerpc.old 2006-06-27 23:41:44.0 -0400 +++ debian/arch/powerpc/config.powerpc 2006-06-27