Bug#455892: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: please enable process accounting

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 08:11]: > The armel kernel for iop32x doesn't have BSD process accounting > configured in, breaking package "acct". Thanks, I'll fix that. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Bug#436267: linux-image-2.6.22-1-686: IEEE1394 modules unbuilt in packaged kernel

2007-12-12 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:32:36PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > hello, > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:20:26PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > > > > another application stopped working after this kernel change. It is > > coriander. I do not know if all applications must be fixed or if a fix

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 09:29]: > After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports > millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel: > $ cat /proc/cpu/alignment I'm away from my N2100 at the moment so I cannot check if I see this as well. Do you think you

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 18:34]: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:47:14AM -0500, Martin Guy wrote: > > > > I *am* running armel unstable, and the latest is 2.6.22-3-iop32x. Do I > > need to wait for the buildds to get round to recompiling it? > > > > M > > latest linux

Bug#415068: I can reproduce #415068 on a UltraSparc 5 over USB serial adapter

2007-12-12 Thread Axel Beckert
found 415068 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5 found 415068 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4 thanks Hi, I'm currently investigating an UltraSparc 5 which didn't come up after the recent kernel update from 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4 to 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5, but it booted without problems after being moved to the office for

Bug#455923: Failt to mount the root filesystem of sata hard disc on amd64 kernel

2007-12-12 Thread Paulo Diovani
Package: linux-image Version: 2.6.23-1-amd64 my kernel does not create /dev/sda1 (root) on boot. grub loads from the same hd and, sometimes, the system works fine, but in most of'em i fall into busybox and have only /dev/hda (cdrom). I changed the /dev/name by UUID= at grub and fstab. I placed som

Processed: Re: Bug#442447: No battery status

2007-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 442447 linux-2.6 Bug#442447: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: Asus M6N batter ystatus missing Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.22-2-686' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.22-2-686' to `linux-2.6'. > -- Stopping processing here. P

Processed: Re: Bug#455923: Failt to mount the root filesystem of sata hard disc on amd64 kernel

2007-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 455923 linux-2.6 Bug#455923: Failt to mount the root filesystem of sata hard disc on amd64 kernel Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `linux-2.6'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#311185: linux-2.6: Does the Debian Kernel Team still have concerns about CONFIG_PREEMPT ?

2007-12-12 Thread maximilian attems
hello francesco, nice to read you! :) On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:10:04AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > If I understand the following output correctly, the current (testing) Linux > kernel does *not* have any preemption activated: > > $ grep -i EMPT /boot/config-2.6.22-3-amd64 > CONFIG_P

Bug#311185: linux-2.6: Does the Debian Kernel Team still have concerns about CONFIG_PREEMPT ?

2007-12-12 Thread Francesco Poli
Package: linux-2.6 Followup-For: Bug #311185 If I understand the following output correctly, the current (testing) Linux kernel does *not* have any preemption activated: $ grep -i EMPT /boot/config-2.6.22-3-amd64 CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set # CONFIG_PREEMP

Processed: reassign #415068 to linux-2.6 and restore versions

2007-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 415068 linux-2.6 Bug#415068: crash in sunsab serial driver Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6,linux-image-2.6.18-5-sparc64' to `linux-2.6'. > found 415068 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Bug#415068: crash in sunsab serial driver Bug marked as found in v

Processed: reassign #415068 to linux-2.6 and linux-image-2.6.18-5-sparc64

2007-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 415068 linux-2.6,linux-image-2.6.18-5-sparc64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5 Bug#415068: crash in sunsab serial driver Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64' to `linux-2.6,linu

Bug#455899: USB IDs for buggy Pegasus chips

2007-12-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:21:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Damn, now the device came up with a new ID. It doesn't look stable to me.. > > Please, put this on hold. If you don't mind, I'd like to keep the bug open, > just in case a solution is found. yep keep us posted. :) -- maks

Processed: tagging 455899

2007-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 455899 - patch Bug#455899: USB IDs for buggy Pegasus chips Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Bug#455899: USB IDs for buggy Pegasus chips

2007-12-12 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:45:11PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > It seems that ADMtek ADM8515 chips report broken USB IDs under certain > conditions. When I plug my usb-ethernet adaptor before the computer is > powered on, it often reports

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread maximilian attems
[ cc bug report readded ] On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:47:14AM -0500, Martin Guy wrote: > > I *am* running armel unstable, and the latest is 2.6.22-3-iop32x. Do I > need to wait for the buildds to get round to recompiling it? > > M latest linux-2.6 should build linux image 2.6.23-1-iop32x pls

Bug#455909: tracking down misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread Larry Doolittle
Martin - > After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports > millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel: > System: 2765980 After checking 2.6.23 from unstable as maks suggested, please report back more detail on the hardware you have in service. I have seen an AR

Bug#436267: Bug#453358: libraw1394-8: Juju firewire stack support.

2007-12-12 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:20:09PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:13 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > > > If you file a bug, please let me know the bug number so I can track it > > too! I'll keep this bug open of course until libraw1394 has support for > > the Juju stack.

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Martin Guy wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x > Version: 2.6.22+11 > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: eabi > Severity: wishlist > > After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports > millions of misaligned word accesses from the kern

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Guy
Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x Version: 2.6.22+11 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Severity: wishlist After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel: $ cat /proc/cpu/alignment User: 0 System: 2765980 Skip

Bug#416388: linux-source-2.6.18: Wodim hangs and system may freeze

2007-12-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:44:26AM +, John Talbut wrote: > etc. > > Is there any reason to think that 2.6.23 would be any different? (I am > using the testing distribution, I would rather not get involved in > backporting.) > > John yes the diffstat between releases are huge. it is really

Processed: tagging 455892

2007-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 455892 + pending Bug#455892: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: please enable process accounting There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#455899: USB IDs for buggy Pegasus chips

2007-12-12 Thread Robert Millan
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch It seems that ADMtek ADM8515 chips report broken USB IDs under certain conditions. When I plug my usb-ethernet adaptor before the computer is powered on, it often reports a broken ID; at which point unplugging/replugging would solve it. I reprodu

Bug#455892: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: please enable process accounting

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Guy
Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x Version: 2.6.22+11 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi The armel kernel for iop32x doesn't have BSD process accounting configured in, breaking package "acct". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Bug#416388: linux-source-2.6.18: Wodim hangs and system may freeze

2007-12-12 Thread John Talbut
Now on kernel 2.6.22 and still getting the same problem. I do: ~$ wodim dev=/dev/cdrw "/data/Our Old Documents 2005-07 oncd" I get: wodim: No write mode specified. wodim: Asuming -tao mode. wodim: Future versions of wodim may have different drive dependent defaults. wodim: Operation not permitt