Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 480995 linux-2.6
Bug#480995: smbfs: Fails to mount.cifs etch samba server in 2.6.25
Bug reassigned from package `smbfs' to `linux-2.6'.
found 480995 2.6.25-2
Bug#480995: smbfs: Fails to mount.cifs etch samba server in 2.6.25
Bug marked as
On Tue, 13 May 2008 02:35:21 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Michal Čihař wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I just tried 2.6.24 kernel and
Hi,
Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To sum it up, all post 2.6.24.4 kernels need the patch (2.6.24.4
included). This includes all 2.6.25.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll send it to -stable after running some
tests.
Sorry to bother again but is there a chance you can send it for
rootdelay has no effect.
The next-to-last message is waiting for root filesystem, the last message
is something about usb...
After that the system hangs.
I tried using sda instead of hda and it works!
Maybe it would be better to use uuid to avoid these problems.
Some time ago I heard about hda
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2008 11:35:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#480637: linux-image-amd64 - waiting for root filesystem
has caused the Debian Bug report #480637,
regarding linux-image-amd64 - waiting for root filesystem
to be marked as done.
This
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-486
Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1
Followup-For: Bug #466525
There is no information about the bug in any of the logs on the computer. I
made a photo of the screen before reboot and uploaded it to
http://img241.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=72042_R0011983_122_492lo.JPG
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:46:51AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
humm is that reproducible with a recent Lenny kernel?
thanks for update.
I left the job where I had access to the hardware about seven months
ago. I seem to remember we were able to avoid the issue by using 2.6.22
or so so
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2008 14:44:56 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#411696: r8169: Fails on interfaces cabled at modprobe
has caused the Debian Bug report #411696,
regarding r8169: Fails on interfaces cabled at modprobe
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Heinrich Hiemesch wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-486
Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1
Followup-For: Bug #466525
There is no information about the bug in any of the logs on the computer. I
made a photo of the screen before reboot and uploaded it to
Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
Hi,
Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To sum it up, all post 2.6.24.4 kernels need the patch (2.6.24.4
included). This includes all 2.6.25.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll send it to -stable after running some
tests.
Sorry to bother again but is there a
linux-2.6_2.6.25-2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
(new) linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb optional devel
All header files for Linux 2.6.25
This package depends against all architecture-specific kernel header files
for Linux kernel version 2.6.25, generally used for building out-of-tree
kernel modules.
What did you upgrade to 2.6.25?
The server, or the client?
The laptop (client) was upgraded to 2.6.25 (it is running unstable)
The etch server is running 2.6.18 (latest in etch/stable)
Can you also try with the version of samba in experimental (for your
laptop, of courseupgrading
Version: 2.6.25-1
The bnx2 driver was included in the 2.6.22-3 kernel
(config-2.6.22-3-amd64:CONFIG_BNX2=m)
but not anymore in 2.6.24. Still this device is commonly used in Dell/HP
server hardware and so
quite usefull.
please do a quick google research next time before reporting
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92a
Severity: minor
File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
Look at that: (updating initrd, duplicates the content of the cryptroot config
file...)
mordor:/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d# cat cryptroot
target=lukspace,source=/dev/hda3,key=none,lvm=evg-root
linux-2.6_2.6.24-7_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-s390-tape_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
to
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.24-6
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
after reading bug #470163, I tried the option nohz=off.
the next 2 reboots worked without a problem.
Kernel 2.6.25 is currently not available for me in unstable (still
beeing build for
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-6
Severity: important
the system clock is no more set correctly at boot time after
I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24. This might be due to the
hwclock commands which becomes unable to perform I/O operations on
/dev/rtc
# hwclock
Your message dated Wed, 14 May 2008 01:08:41 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#481130: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: hwclock fails to
carry out select() calls on /dev/rtc after update from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #481130,
regarding
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 10:58 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
sfc arm, armel, powerpc, sparc 475467 yes
merged for 2.6.26 so can be dropped soon.
Yes, I'm rather pleased about this one. :-)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Always try to
21 matches
Mail list logo
