On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:17:18PM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
Log:
add inconsistent kallsyms data patch by waldi
No.
Bastian
--
There are some things worth dying for.
-- Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3201.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:19:33AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
latest stable release is long awaited for testing,
thus upload with high urgency this night.
Nack.
Bastian
--
Even historians fail to learn from history -- they repeat the same mistakes.
-- John Gill, Patterns
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:19:33AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
latest stable release is long awaited for testing,
thus upload with high urgency this night.
I don't see a security problem which forces immediate action, which may
also varant the priority setting. Also common sense is to warn
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'm not sure what's the preferred form of proposing kernel config
changes, but I'd like to propose support adding JFFS2 Summary
and Compressor support. These features are being used on many
products (such as Nokia n8x0 tablets),
according to the build log
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.25-6;arch=alpha;stamp=1214551466
alpha linux image built fine with belows patch,
please have an eye.
thanks
--
maks
- Forwarded message from Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Version: 2.6.18+6etch3
Severity: important
Using the latest debian kernel on smp 64bit systems we can see random general
protection fault: [11] SMP stack traces.
This is always related to high nfsv3 traffic (e.g. imap or pop3 services).
I attach some stack
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
Version: 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1
Severity: important
bnx2 modules is useless on this kernel package
Loading Linux version 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
Kernel 2.6.25 hangs on a Dell PowerEdge 850. This is the lockup captured
with netconsole:
[ 873.350023] NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU 0
[ 873.350023] CPU 0
[ 873.350023] Modules linked in: ac battery
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:26:16 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #480733,
regarding Attempts to build PCI drivers on platforms without PCI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:25:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #478314,
regarding linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-7 fails to compile on many
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Any progress on ndiswrapper?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:27:17 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#488265: linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf: Problem using
bnx2 module
has caused the Debian Bug report #488265,
regarding linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf: Problem using bnx2 module
to be
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-xen-686
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: important
Hi,
Here's the console log of my first boot attempt under
xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 (version 3.2.0-3~bpo4+2). The second
brought essentially the same result. The guest system is an
up to date Lenny, the host is Etch,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:03:36PM +0300, Evaggelos Souglakos wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
Version: 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1
Severity: important
bnx2 modules is useless on this kernel package
Loading Linux version 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:50:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #488208,
regarding virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6-686: vbox version 1.5.6 not 1.6.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:51:52 +0200
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
These are the patches Andres made sent upstream:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/936294
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/937056
If they don't make it to 2.6.26,
Hello,
I have already installed the firmware-bnx2 package
dpkg -l |grep bnx
ii firmware-bnx20.11~bpo40+1
Binary firmware
for Broadcom NetXtremeII
dpkg -l | grep linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
ii linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:39:25PM +0300, Evaggelos Souglakos wrote:
Hello,
I have already installed the firmware-bnx2 package
dpkg -l |grep bnx
ii firmware-bnx20.11~bpo40+1
Binary firmware
for Broadcom NetXtremeII
You need the one
ok so time to notify upstream, please file the corresponding info
in bugzilla.kernel.org saying that it is not a regression
but with the oops output.
lspci might help too.
My report against this bug (#487725) remains unchanged. (Kernel NOT Tainted)
I'm so sorry.
please tell us the upstream
19 matches
Mail list logo
