Bug#491969: X sluggish on 2.6.25 after several hours uptime

2008-07-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Kevin Shanahan wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 Version: 2.6.25-7 When Linux 2.6.25 has been running for a while (say, several hours) xorg starts to respond more slowly and sporadically. Everythin seems okay for a while after boot, or at least the effects are

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-23 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26 before final ack on that release. If this is the

Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed)

2008-07-23 Thread Sam Hocevar
tags 474648 +patch thanks On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Sam Hocevar wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.24-5 Severity: important CONFIG_SECCOMP was disabled for performance reasons, but it has always been harmless. Dear maintainers, any news on this issue? I see that

Processed: tagging 474648

2008-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 474648 + pending Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed) Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: reassign 460667 to linux-2.6

2008-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 reassign 460667 linux-2.6 Bug#460667: linux-source-2.6.23: mol.ko (Mac-on-Linux emulator module) needs handle_mm_fault symbol Warning: Unknown package 'linux-source-2.6.23' Bug

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny

2008-07-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Aurelien, On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:19:01PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: - The switch to linux-libc-dev 2.6.25 is the reason why glibc currently FTBFS on hppa (due to a timeout in a test). Unfortunately I don't know yet which change causes the problem, I am down to a 600 lines diff. Have

Processed: tagging 460667

2008-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 460667 + pending Bug#460667: linux-source-2.6.23: mol.ko (Mac-on-Linux emulator module) needs handle_mm_fault symbol There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message,

Processing of linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_ia64.changes

2008-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1.dsc linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1.tar.gz

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:02:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: I'd prefer to have it on experimental before upload it to unstable so first and more urgent issues wouldn't bother us and users however this is more up to you and RM team then me. My preference would be: - upload to

Processed: reassign 492029 to linux-2.6

2008-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33 reassign 492029 linux-2.6 Bug#492029: ITP: atl1e -- Atheros(R) L1e ethernet driver Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `linux-2.6'. End of message, stopping processing here.

user-mode-linux 2.6.25 [was Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload]

2008-07-23 Thread Mattia Dongili
[d-boot probably not interested in this subtopic] On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:48:20PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26 before final ack on that

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:07:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: That's just adding an arbitrary 5 days delay. Uploading to experimental won't uncover new issues, because nobody uses packages in experimental. Uploading it to sid, will make a revertion to .25 much harder if needed. Besides

Bug#463808: kernel crash (Cause : 0000041c)

2008-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-03 15:50]: Today I tried latest kernel and found this error. I did at least 5 reboot in a total of 3 hours, since the machine never survived more than half an hour. Hardware: SGI O2, cpu [EMAIL PROTECTED] V2.1, memory 384Mb. This bug has been