On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of
the problematic userspace header changes in 2.6.26.
I believe the following other incompatible changes should be addressed:
asm-arm/unistd.h -
hello
after getting an irc query and bug report on our currently set number of
cpu for the upcoming lenny release:
/boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
- http://bugs.debian.org/491309
we came to this issue:
10:13 waldi 1345623 3148364 417112 4911099 4aeffb x86_64-255/vmlinux
10:13
Hi,
from cujrrent intel and amd roadmaps, expect 4-way and 8-way 12 core
boxes during the lenny life cycle.
I think NR_CPUS should really be set to 96, at least.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:25:32AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
we came to this issue:
10:13 waldi 1345623 3148364 417112
US Soldiers kill villagers http://www.scdormello.it/default.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:54:55PM +0400, CoolCold wrote:
Hello! I've found this
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488865 is marked as fixed
in version 0.91e, but is it going to be fixed in stable aka etch? Should bug
be reopened or smth like this?
this is cut from
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of
the problematic userspace header changes in 2.6.26.
I believe the following other incompatible
Accepted:
atl2-modules-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf/atl2-modules-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-sparc64-smp-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.deb
to
Accepted:
atl2-modules-2.6-footbridge-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf/atl2-modules-2.6-footbridge-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-iop32x-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.deb
to
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
It's working but I see this:
# dmesg |grep sky
[1.808667] sky2 :02:00.0: v1.21 addr 0xfdffc000 irq 16 Yukon-EC
Ultra (0xb4) rev 3
[1.808986] sky2 eth0: addr 00:1f:c6:56:d0:21
[
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
the current release blocker is the linux-libc-dev patch by
waldi that is reviewed by vorlon to keep the lenny build chain stable.
patch incorporating review got in.
thanks waldi and vorlon!
i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[d-boot probably not interested in this subtopic]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:48:20PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup
plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say a NEWS entry.
If the package doesn't exist anymore, it can't have a NEWS file. And
spamming the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW.
Nack.
Bastian
--
You're dead, Jim.
-- McCoy, The Tholian Web, stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say a NEWS entry.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User:
This one time, at band camp, Otavio Salvador said:
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW.
Nack.
Do you mind to be more descriptive?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say a NEWS entry.
If the package doesn't exist anymore, it
maximilian attems wrote:
hello
after getting an irc query and bug report on our currently set number of
cpu for the upcoming lenny release:
/boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
- http://bugs.debian.org/491309
we came to this issue:
10:13 waldi 1345623 3148364 417112 4911099
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see
how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 perspective.)
May this change be applicable to 2.6.26 or will it break something else?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:19:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see
how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096
perspective.)
May this
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see
how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 perspective.)
May this change be applicable to 2.6.26 or will it
Your last chance for free credit http://ebberov.homepage.dk/default.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi-
I can see in the message thread, it appears this problem has been fixed.
However, I can't find a version of the ccs package other than ver.
1.03.00-2.
I've looked everywhere, even in backports.
If this was fixed, could someone point me to where the new package is?
(it also does not show
Subject: [PANIC][REGRESSION] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: kernel fails to mount
root on LVM2
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-7
Severity: serious
Justification: kernel panic
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
I installed today debian on a MSI MegaBook
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
# lilo fuck up
severity 492918 normal
Bug#492918: [PANIC][REGRESSION] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: kernel fails to
mount root on LVM2
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
End of
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
# lilo fuck up
severity 492918 normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo
