Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
forwarded 504167 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978
Bug#504167: linux-2.6 - regression: fails to unblank on resume
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 493957 + pending
Bug#493957: ARM: problems with umlauts and other chars on ext3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:07:34AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
There's also a patch/request to raise the number of supported cores
in the bigmem flavour to support a 16 core Dell system. (#497807)
Merged and fixed.
Bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
--
Hi,
This seems to be fixed (at least for me - with an MCP51 chipset) in 2.6.27.5
vanilla kernel.
This commit [1], by Tejun Heo, doesn't try hardreseting link on generic
devices (MCP51 and MCP55 are generic ones).
[1]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 504926 important
Bug#504926: linux-2.6: read() of /dev/rtc hangs on some systems
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
notfound 504926 2.6.24-5
Bug#504926: linux-2.6: read() of /dev/rtc hangs on some systems
Bug no longer marked as found
severity 504926 important
notfound 504926 2.6.24-5
close 504926
thanks
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 01:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Assumed; submitter had 2.6.24.3 which was never packaged in Debian
found 504926 2.6.24-5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 479381 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10728
Bug#479381: linux-image-2.6.25-1-686: Booting pauses for about 30 seconds on
Acer Aspire 5710Z
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
linux-2.6_2.6.26-10_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.26-10.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.26-10.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-10_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-10_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-10_all.deb
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 04:30 +0100, Sebastian Krause wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:08:25AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 04 May 2008, Sebastian Krause wrote:
Since the interval is heartbeat=30 sec and also the pause is always
about 30 seconds long,
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 01:01:24PM +0100, peter green wrote:
please try out a newer kernel 2.6.25-rc8 is available,
see trunk snapshots apt line:
- http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
I can confirm that 2.6.25-rc8 has the same problem.
Peter, is this bug still reproducible with
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.26-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-10.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.26-10.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-10.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-10_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-10_all.deb
Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:17:38 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#493957: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #493957,
regarding ARM: problems with umlauts and other chars on ext3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:17:38 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#504723: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #504723,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-ixp4xx: cdc_acm.ko is missing from this package
although it exists in the x86
Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:17:38 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#503821: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #503821,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: Kernel crash in Dom0 (Eeek!
page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1))
On 2008-11-08 18:04 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I've seen this problem too, but never got round to reporting it as a
bug. I'm not sure whether it's the kernel or udev (or something else)
at fault. It's totally reproducible on this particular machine so I can
provide any information
Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:17:38 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#503821: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #503821,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went
negative! (-1), kernel BUG at
Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:17:38 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#503821: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #503821,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: kernel oops after short on memory
situation
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
unarchive 476120
Bug 476120 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: please set CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP
Unarchived Bug 476120
forcemerge 476120 497807
Bug#476120: linux-2.6: please set CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
reassign 497807 linux-2.6
Bug#497807: [PATCH] fails to boot with 16 cores
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.26-1-686-bigmem' to `linux-2.6'.
forcemerge 476120 497807
Bug
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:32:08PM +0100, David wrote:
Sorry, it does not work in 2.6.25 either. And maybe it is worse now: IIRC,
not even the interface ath0 did work (before, ath0 worked but no wifis were
detected).
At boot time I could see something in red about ath0, but the boot verbose
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 17:04 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 04:30 +0100, Sebastian Krause wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:08:25AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 04 May 2008, Sebastian Krause wrote:
Since the interval is
No. Read the rest of the bug history :-) My last email was on 10 August,
when the 2.6.26 kernel was already in sid, IIRC. On that email, I say *from
* version 2.6.25.
Thank you.
Does it work for you with the 2.6.26 kernel from Lenny?
Cheers,
Moritz
Peter, is this bug still reproducible with 2.6.26 from Lenny?
yes
and with the 2.6.27 version from that archive someone told me to try
earlier in the bug report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 500358 grave
Bug#500358: mach64 stopped working on the Sun Ultra 5 graphics card after
upgrade
Bug#488669: kernel changes break X on sparc64/pci
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
severity 500358 grave
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
As this affects a major part of all SPARC machines, I really think this is
release
critical and the bug severity should be upgraded again. If you don't disagree
strongly
I will upgrade it in the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 500358 important
Bug#500358: mach64 stopped working on the Sun Ultra 5 graphics card after
upgrade
Bug#488669: kernel changes break X on sparc64/pci
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
severity 500358 important
thanks
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 11:54:38PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
As this affects a major part of all SPARC machines, I really think this is
release
critical and the bug severity should be
27 matches
Mail list logo
