On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:58:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
When N (where N 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain
about not being able to boot, the priorities
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:28:18AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
When N (where N 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain
about not being able to boot, the
From: Josip Rodin j...@debbugs.entuzijast.net
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:20:39 +0100
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:58:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
When N (where N 0) users
Hi Otavio ;-)
On Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I won't be at FOSDEM :(
You certainly missed a lot, but you didnt miss that meeting as it didnt take
place. (TTBOMK)
I planned to attend as I really really would like to see Debian Edu CDs build
as part of the normal Debian
From: Josip Rodin j...@debbugs.entuzijast.net
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:45:27 +0100
But then, it would have been completely your prerogative to respond to that
simply by saying - DTRT and go upgrade X, patching old X is a waste of my
time, and I guess nobody wanted to risk hearing that answer?
[...]
c. his means there will be no need for /etc/kernel-img.conf file any
more.
[...]
Isn't this file also read in the postinst of the official kernels? In FAI we
had several issues when kernel-img.conf was missing or hadn't had the proper
values in there.
Best,
Michael
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 512617 + patch
Bug#512617: kernel repeated warnings
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486
Version: 2.6.26+17
Severity: normal
The iethernet adaptor 0x8086:0x10de does not work for me with this kernel.
It is supposed to work with 2.6.28.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,
tags 512617 + patch
thanks
I'm unfortunately able to reproduce this bug on an HP dc7900 with the
latest available BIOS (V1.11).
The patch in 2.6.28 looks trivial to backport to 2.6.26: it consists simply of
replacing WARN_ON with WARN_ON_ONCE. See
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:59:41AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:42 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
[...]
* FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL
default enabled
we probably don't ship right yet relevant firmware separetly?
FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL enables inclusion of firmware along
Hi
On Montag, 9. Februar 2009, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
c. his means there will be no need for /etc/kernel-img.conf file any
more.
[...]
Isn't this file also read in the postinst of the official kernels? In FAI we
had several issues when kernel-img.conf was missing or
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
fbdev as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a
better fix for Xorg.
We can probably do that for r1.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Sven Eckelmann wrote:
Please add batman-adv modules to autobuilt modules. The current version of the
package is currently in the new queue due to a source package split.
please ping again when lenny is released *and* your source package has
made it into unstable, thanks.
--
Address:
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add batman-adv modules to autobuilt modules. The current version of the
package is currently in the new queue due to a source package split.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.28.1
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-sparc64
Version: 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1
For some time, even since 2.6.18 we have had problems with the sungem
NIC driver on our Sun Netra T1 AC200[1] where the machine is prone to
locking up.
Then recently this month on the LKML someone posted[2] that
Am Dienstag 03 Februar 2009 13:47:04 schrieben Sie:
* root tom-k...@gmx.de [2009-02-02 08:33]:
[42994982.81] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 692f7473
Can you please tell us more: when does this happen, how often, how
reliably can you reproduce this problem,
Hi Till and other I2C developers,
Thomas Koch, a Debian user, reported the following backtrace with
2.6.26 related to i2c and possibly related to the i2c-tiny-usb driver.
This is on an ARM device.
Do you know if this is a known issue for which a patch is available in
newer kernels, or is this a
On Mon, Feb 09 2009, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
c. his means there will be no need for /etc/kernel-img.conf file any
more.
[...]
Isn't this file also read in the postinst of the official kernels?
In FAI we had several issues when kernel-img.conf was missing or
hadn't had
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:35:40AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Otavio ;-)
On Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I won't be at FOSDEM :(
You certainly missed a lot, but you didnt miss that meeting as it didnt take
place. (TTBOMK)
Sorry, it did. Unfortunately at a really bad
Hi Till and other I2C developers,
Thomas Koch, a Debian user, reported the following backtrace with
2.6.26 related to i2c and possibly related to the i2c-tiny-usb driver.
This is on an ARM device.
Do you know if this is a known issue for which a patch is available in
newer kernels, or is this a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 514624 linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64
Bug#514624: linux-image for sparc64 sungem problems
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-sparc64' to
`linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64'.
forcemerge 508151 514624
Bug#508151:
Hi,
sorry for topposting, the symbian mail client sucks ;)
but yes, i would be able to test the fix on my netra.
regards
evgeni
-- Ursprüngl. Mitteil. --
Betreff:Bug#508151: Bug#514624: linux-image for sparc64 sungem problems
Von:dann frazier da...@debian.org
Datum:
reassign 514624 linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64
forcemerge 508151 514624
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:22:19 +0100
with message-id 20090209192219.gb5...@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net
and subject line Re: Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop
has caused the Debian Bug report #446323,
regarding mdadm: recovery in infinite loop
to be marked as done.
This
Hi,
this is an unknown problem. In fact it's the first time i ever got an error
report for the device. And therefore there isn't any patch.
There seems to be a usb write error. This is a diy hardware. There may
be several reasons causing such problems:
Hardware problems on the i2c-tiny-usb:
-
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-13
Severity: normal
#v+
# dev=wire
# ip link set $dev down
# sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.$dev.use_tempaddr=2
net.ipv6.conf.wire.use_tempaddr = 2
# sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.$dev.max_desync_factor=0
net.ipv6.conf.wire.max_desync_factor = 0
# sysctl -w
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-13
Severity: normal
Documentation for temp_prefered_lft states that:
#v+
temp_prefered_lft - INTEGER
Preferred lifetime (in seconds) for temporary addresses.
Default: 86400 (1 day)
#v-
But this setting seems to be ignored:
#v+
#
It fails the same way with Lenny rc2 as previous versions did.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?
If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug
with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.24.html
Miritz Muehlenhoff,
Here are the results for
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:43:45 -0700 dann frazier wrote:
Would you and/or Evgeni be able to test a 2.6.26 build to verify this
fix if I provide one?
I've just rebuilt 2.6.29-rc3 with the patch from
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=123393014301523w=2
And it brought up the interface fine.
There
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:30:00PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes:
...
The main focus of the meeting was how d-i builds and releases work,
and I think we made quite some progress on that. There are a few
changes that we think should be made that will help
Installing:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24_all.deb
to
Installing:
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8.diff.gz
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8_all.deb
to
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:39 +
with message-id e1lwdn1-0003cy...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#502553: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #502553,
regarding support new smart array controllers
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:39 +
with message-id e1lwdn1-0003cc...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#506420: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #506420,
regarding incorrect hwcap line in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc6-xen.conf?
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:30 +
with message-id e1lwdms-0003bp...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#502553: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #502553,
regarding support new smart array controllers
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:39 +
with message-id e1lwdn1-0003ca...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#506418: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #506418,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64: domU soft lockup detected
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:30 +
with message-id e1lwdms-0003bt...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#506420: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #506420,
regarding incorrect hwcap line in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc6-xen.conf?
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:53 +
with message-id e1lwdnf-0003ew...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#506420: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #506420,
regarding incorrect hwcap line in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc6-xen.conf?
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:30 +
with message-id e1lwdms-0003br...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#506418: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #506418,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64: domU soft lockup detected
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:53 +
with message-id e1lwdnf-0003eu...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#506418: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #506418,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64: domU soft lockup detected
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:40 +
with message-id e1lwdn2-0003cm...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#502553: fixed in linux-2.6.24 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #502553,
regarding support new smart array controllers
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:35:53 +
with message-id e1lwdnf-0003es...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#502553: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #502553,
regarding support new smart array controllers
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
tags 502553 + pending
Bug#502553: support new smart array controllers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
tags 506420 + pending
Bug#506420: incorrect hwcap line in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc6-xen.conf?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
tags 506418 + pending
Bug#506418: linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64: domU soft lockup detected
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
tags 502553 + pending
Bug#502553: support new smart array controllers
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:54:24PM +, Alexander Clouter wrote:
Would you and/or Evgeni be able to test a 2.6.26 build to verify
this
fix if I provide one?
Guess I would be then committing myself to move to lenny sooner
rather
than later for my co-locatin box :)
Sure, why not.
On
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
tags 514624 + pending
Bug#514624: linux-image for sparc64 sungem problems
There were no tags set.
Bug#508151: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64: soft lockup when trying to bring
I believe this is resolved with version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24 of
linux-image-2.6.18-6.486:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : unknown
cpu family : 4
model : 0
model name : 486
stepping: unknown
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug
50 matches
Mail list logo
