Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 521353 important
Bug#521353: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: sky2 driver vlan problem
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
hello,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
I am just experimenting with initramfs-based kernels and I tried to use
mkinitramfs, with the following command taken from the manpage:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(...)
Adding module
hi
i dont think the problem is a mismatch of userland and kernel
architectures...
i have an amd64 system with amd64 kernel and amd64 virtualbox
everything.
the problem seems to be that the version of the virtualbox kernel module
and the virtualbox userspace package are not even close (one is 2.*
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: normal
File: linux-image-2.6.29
Hi,
now that firmware has been cut out of the kernel binary, of course the DRM for
r300 fails:
[ 69.137177] [drm] Loading R300 Microcode
[ 69.137182] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
tags 497593 + pending
Bug#497593: firmware-iwlwifi: New firmware for IW 3945 available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing
firmware-nonfree_0.15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.15.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.15.tar.gz
firmware-bnx2_0.15_all.deb
firmware-ipw2x00_0.15_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.15_all.deb
firmware-linux_0.15_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.15_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.15_all.deb
firmware-ipw2x00_0.15_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-ipw2x00_0.15_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.15_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_0.15_all.deb
(new)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 521417 linux-2.6
Bug#521417: kernel: Kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:522
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `linux-2.6'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: kernel
Version: Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Getting kernel panics at various times. Sometimes it recovers, and
sometimes it locks the
whole system. Seems to happen when some process is doing a lot of HD
work (or could be just
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 521417 important
Bug#521417: kernel: Kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:522
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
* Evgeni Golov [Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:11:01 +0100]:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:26:55 +0100 Adeodato Simó wrote:
tp-smapi-source does not build against linux-headers-2.6.29. The problem
is that the Makefile checks for the presence of an include header, but
if you check
[maximilian attems]
if you change fstab you have to also pass the corresponding bootflag.
if you have manualy set this, you just have to fix your bootloader.
if debian installer sets it which i don't know,
then it is up to debian installer to pass the right rootflags.
Changing fstab has no
[Ralph]
There should be a hint written as a comment in /etc/fstab that some
mount options modifying the rootfs only have an effect via bootflag
or initrd !
For most flags, it does not matter. The initrd mounts the root
filesystem read-only, but early in the boot process, an init script
runs
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:21:21PM +0100, Ralph wrote:
[maximilian attems]
if you change fstab you have to also pass the corresponding bootflag.
if you have manualy set this, you just have to fix your bootloader.
if debian installer sets it which i don't know,
then it is up to debian
Known, some problem in the /dev/mem logic. As only X.org 1.4 still uses this
interface, I tend to ignore it until someone provides a patch.
Newer versions uses the /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/resource* interface, can
you please check if at least this works?
I can confirm this bug in stable: Lenny
Hello list,
due to a serious bug introduced about 3 days before Linus' closing of 2.6.29
the kernel 2.6.29 spread in Debian Sid is unusable for networking purposes.
For that reason it's strongly recommended to apply the following patch against
the kernel source tree and redebianize this kernel
linux-latest-2.6_17+lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-latest-2.6_17+lenny1.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_17+lenny1.tar.gz
linux-image-k7_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6-k7_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
linux-headers-2.6-k7_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
linux-image-2.6-k7_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb: package says priority is extra,
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1.dsc
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1.tar.gz
rt73-modules-2.6.26-2-486_2.6.26+1.0.3.6-cvs20080623-dfsg1-3+lenny1_i386.deb
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1.dsc
to
pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1.dsc
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1.tar.gz
to
pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-3+lenny1.tar.gz
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.26-6+lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.26-6+lenny1.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.26-6+lenny1.tar.gz
atl2-modules-2.6.26-2-486_2.6.26+2.0.5-6+lenny1_i386.deb
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.26-2+lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.26-2+lenny1.dsc
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.26-2+lenny1.tar.gz
fglrx-modules-2.6.26-2-486_2.6.26+8-12-2+lenny1_i386.deb
Package: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to build anything against 2.6.29 headers on i386 fails due to a missing
file.
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common/arch/x86/Makefile:41:
package: linux-2.6
severity: wishlist
tags: security
there are now several security hardening kernel patches available in
the debian archive (e.g. execshield and grsecurity). it would be great
if these patches were incorporated into the default kernel packages.
this would go a long way toward
I confirm this behaviour on 2.6.28 (unstable).
Haven't tested on 2.6.29 - other error (#521492) occurs.
This error occurs on my AMD Duron 32-bit, but
burning on AMD 64-bit at work occurs without problem.
So far for burning I use 2.6.23, but I wonder
how long I will be able to boot with this
fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.26-2+lenny1_i386.deb
to
pool/non-free/l/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.26-2+lenny1_i386.deb
fglrx-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.26-2+lenny1_i386.deb
to
pool/non-free/l/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/fglrx-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.26-2+lenny1_i386.deb
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: important
Today I upgraded my Debian unstable. I installed new kernel 2.6.29
and udev 9.140. After that during boot ATI framebuffer is enabled
(I am not sure if it is related - I have ATI Radeon).
Now, when I put DVD into my burnen (I
Wrong, Lenny and Squeeze atm have xorg 1.4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:23:59 +0100
with message-id 20090327222359.gd3...@baikonur.stro.at
and subject line Re: Bug#521482: linux-2.6: adopt hardening patches (execshield
and grsecurity) into default kernel packages for squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #521482,
regarding
get them upstream merged
see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
but doesn't it make sense to be proactive about security? this isn't
really a security fix, but it a security improvement.
i can't even fathom how to get this merged upstream since redhat has
been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #444818
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9105
# * remote status
Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org writes:
Historically, /usr/src/linux-headers-VERSION-FLAVOR used to contain
symlinks into /usr/src/linux-headers-VERSION-common for anything not at
least potentially flavor-specific. As of 2.6.29-1, that no longer
holds, causing trouble for packages such as
Package: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.29-1
Severity: normal
Historically, /usr/src/linux-headers-VERSION-FLAVOR used to contain
symlinks into /usr/src/linux-headers-VERSION-common for anything not at
least potentially flavor-specific. As of 2.6.29-1, that no longer
holds, causing
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.26+17+lenny1_i386.deb
Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:47:14 +
with message-id 20090328024714.gr3...@decadent.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#521400: linux-image-2.6.29: firmare request for radeon
r300 failed
has caused the Debian Bug report #521400,
regarding linux-image-2.6.29: firmare request for radeon
clone 521520 -1
reassign -1 linux-2.6
retitle -1 it's about time that proper autoloading aliases are added to
floppy.ko
thanks
On Mar 28, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe mario.ho...@tu-ilmenau.de wrote:
Switching back to 0.125-7 fixes this. Since the Debian ChangeLog doesn't
state any change
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 521520 -1
Bug#521520: udev: floppy not autoloaded anymore
Bug 521520 cloned as bug 521523.
reassign -1 linux-2.6
Bug#521523: udev: floppy not autoloaded anymore
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'.
retitle -1 it's about
38 matches
Mail list logo
