On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:25:38AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:58:22AM +0200, Lars Hanke wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > is there a reason, why this fix did not make it into the last Release.
> > After reading the changelog I set my Kernel on hold before the update,
Darren Salt wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> [make-kpkg]
> >> But is anyone still using it? Is there any current reason to support it
Well, there's still some kernel options that are immutable and
multiple choice. And there's always people that want to optimize. Out of
l
I demand that Manoj Srivastava may or may not have written...
> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
[make-kpkg]
>> But is anyone still using it? Is there any current reason to support it
> I think that there are Debian users who use that option of make-kpkg, and I
> have not seen any indication
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> Ah. there were symlinks in / - tho they were never ever used on this
> system.
>
> Seems pretty broken to rely on symlinks that might (and are) years out
> of date.
dpkg --compare-versions 2.6.29-rc8-amd64 '>' 2.6.29-1-amd64 && echo true
true
gr
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:58:22AM +0200, Lars Hanke wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> is there a reason, why this fix did not make it into the last Release.
> After reading the changelog I set my Kernel on hold before the update,
> which locks me out of security updates, which is a least desirable
> situ
On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>>> (i.e. is there any reason to _add_ support for it in deb-pkg or in
>>> whatever the kernel team is planning)?
>>
>> I think so. If we do standardize on /etc/kernel/*.d directories
Hi there,
is there a reason, why this fix did not make it into the last Release.
After reading the changelog I set my Kernel on hold before the update,
which locks me out of security updates, which is a least desirable
situation.
Regards,
- lars.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:03:37PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:48:53PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> >> Quoting "maximilian attems" :
> >> >On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> >> >>I wonder, whether
Your message dated Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:36:55 +0200
with message-id <20090401223655.gf3...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#522215: firmware-iwlwifi: wireless device no more
detected
has caused the Debian Bug report #522215,
regarding firmware-iwlwifi: wireless device no more detected
to
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:59PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> I commented out the junk in fs/dcache.c and the kernel compiled. :)
>
> I will send you the sysrq-D info next time I get the bug!
Oops ... now OpenVZ won't start!
magrathea:~# vzctl start 101
Starting VE ...
MOUNTING
On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> The default for deb-pkg should IMO remain /etc/kernel in order not to
> break things for existing users. If you move to /lib and users want to
> follow, they
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:03:21PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:51:02PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > 2. We need sysrq-D info after lockup, so try to compile kernel without
> > CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS.
>
> With this week's new Debian lenny kernel source package, I had no
On Wed, Apr 01 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:48:53PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>> Quoting "maximilian attems" :
>> >On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>> >>I wonder, whether it would be OK to let linux-source-2.6.29 recommend
>> >>zlib1g-dev, like pro
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>> (i.e. is there any reason to _add_ support for it in deb-pkg or in
>> whatever the kernel team is planning)?
>
> I think so. If we do standardize on /etc/kernel/*.d directories
> as the place where kernel packages will loo
On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> - using debhelper would probably imply running a clean target and that's
> one of the reasons why I very much prefer deb-pkg over make-kpkg:
> build times with deb-pkg are significantly lower
When I ditched the debian/official support in the ne
On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I think this is best held on -devel, since a wider audience will
>> benefit from this.
>
> I've replied to d-kernel, but thanks for this "heads up" to d-devel.
> If there is sufficient interest in the topic, we can summar
On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Only just submitted:
>http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=123861445626856&w=2
>
> maks has also submitted a set of patches:
>http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=123851278623264&w=2Some discussion on
> those:
>http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=123
(dropping ltsp as the list is moderated)
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether this discussion should happen here (d-kernel +
> > selected interested parties) or would be better held on d-devel.
> > If ppl think it wou
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> > what be cool would be to have it use debhelper instead of the
> > dpkg call.
I disagree. deb-pkg only creates a two binary packages. It's not a
"normal" package build process at all and the dir
(dropping ltsp as the list is moderated)
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> My patch series for the upstream kernel contains roughly the following
>> changes:
[...]
> Where are these patches?
Only just submitted:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=123861445626856&w=2
maks has also submitted a
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, Valentino Pacifici wrote:
> Subject: firmware-iwlwifi: wireless device no more detected
> Package: firmware-iwlwifi
> Version: 0.15
> Severity: important
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> After upgrading the package 0.14 to 0.15 my wireless adapter is no m
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, Valentino Pacifici wrote:
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
> APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
> APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'),
> (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 506964 + pending
Bug#506964: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: radeonfb suspend/resume for Acer
Travelmate 29X
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stoppin
The bug is into the megaraid_mbox driver. I tried Yellow Dog Linux 6.1
and the installer also crash when it's loading this driver.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Subject: firmware-iwlwifi: wireless device no more detected
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.15
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After upgrading the package 0.14 to 0.15 my wireless adapter is no more
detected. the module is correctly loaded but ifconfig does
On Tue, Mar 24 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure whether this discussion should happen here (d-kernel +
> selected interested parties) or would be better held on d-devel.
> If ppl think it would be better on d-devel, then please let me know and
> I'll restart it there.
I
Package: firmware-bnx2
Severity: important
Hi, I'm currently setting up some new Dell Poweredge 1950 servers that
happen to use the Broadcom 5709 GigE cards. I've set up similiar
poweredge servers in the past that also used bnx2 cards, and have had a
similiar issue.
Here's what happened from th
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:48:53PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "maximilian attems" :
> >On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> >>I wonder, whether it would be OK to let linux-source-2.6.29 recommend
> >>zlib1g-dev, like propposed by Dann on 2009-02-03?
> ...
>
> >no.
>
> Th
Quoting "maximilian attems" :
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
I wonder, whether it would be OK to let linux-source-2.6.29 recommend
zlib1g-dev, like propposed by Dann on 2009-02-03?
...
no.
Thanks for the elaborate answer. What is solution to the problem, if
it's neither addin
Quoting "maximilian attems" :
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
(Or, let Linux support eight instead of four serial ports by default,
so that I don't need to build a kernel at the first place.)
it does up to 32, just boot with nr_uarts=16 or 8250.nr_uarts=16
Ah, vielen Dank! I wi
Your message dated Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:49:34 +0200
with message-id <20090401154934.gy27...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.27-rc5-686-bigmem seems to work
has caused the Debian Bug report #498391,
regarding linux-image-2.6-1-486: crashes on a VIA C7 @ 1.8GHz CentaurHauls
to be marked
Your message dated Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:18:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#521531: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.16
has caused the Debian Bug report #521531,
regarding firmware-ipw2x00: New firmware for IPW 2200/2915 released
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:18:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#509693: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.16
has caused the Debian Bug report #509693,
regarding new qlogic firmware available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Accepted:
firmware-bnx2_0.16_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.16_all.deb
firmware-ipw2x00_0.16_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-ipw2x00_0.16_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.16_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_0.16_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
firmware-bnx2_0.16_all.deb: package says section is non-free/admin, override
says non-free/kernel.
firmware-ipw2x00_0.16_all.deb: package says section is non-free/admin, override
says non
can we have an update to 2.6.29?
the juju firewire stack improved a lot since 2.6.25.
kind regards
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 431500 + pending
Bug#431500: please include pata_jmicron
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:53:15 +0200
with message-id <20090401145315.gw3...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: please can we have PATA support in sata_promise?
has caused the Debian Bug report #473411,
regarding please can we have PATA support in sata_promise?
to be marked as done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 458493 + pending
Bug#458493: linux-image-2.6 and JMicron IDE controller
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
firmware-nonfree_0.16_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.16.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.16.tar.gz
firmware-bnx2_0.16_all.deb
firmware-ipw2x00_0.16_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.16_all.deb
firmware-linux_0.16_all.deb
firmware-qlogic_0.16_a
>> I was looking into the same hotswap issue and found to my surprise
>> that the debian kernel has the needed support _removed in the kernel
>> sources_.
> Supporting and not breaking thousands of machines is more important
> that supporting one.
Yes, that would be definitively true.
But there is
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> what be cool would be to have it use debhelper instead of the
> dpkg call.
also a linux header and linux-libc-dev package creation.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
[sorry for the cc/bug spam, but the symptoms of these bugs seem similar,
so this information might be useful beyond debbugs #516374]
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:06:43PM -0500, John Morrissey wrote:
> I'm experiencing the same thing sporadically with two machines running a
> handful of KVM VMs. It
reassign 522041 cryptsetup
stop
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:31:28 +0200
> maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:47:49AM +0200, Michael Lange wrote:
> > > Package: initramfs-tools
> > > Version: 0.92o
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> >
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> I wonder, whether it would be OK to let linux-source-2.6.29 recommend
> zlib1g-dev, like propposed by Dann on 2009-02-03? After all, I take the
> .config from the standard Debian kernel package, which says:
> /boot/config-2.6.29-1-686:CONFIG_LGUEST_G
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> (Or, let Linux support eight instead of four serial ports by default,
> so that I don't need to build a kernel at the first place.)
it does up to 32, just boot with nr_uarts=16 or 8250.nr_uarts=16
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RUNTIME_UARTS=4
CONFIG_SERIAL_825
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure whether this discussion should happen here (d-kernel +
> selected interested parties) or would be better held on d-devel.
> If ppl think it would be better on d-devel, then please let me know and
> I'll restart it there.
think th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 522041 cryptsetup
Bug#522041: initramfs-tools: conf/conf.d/cryptroot missing from initrd.img when
using file system label
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `cryptsetup'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Alberto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:26:53 +0200
> maximilian attems wrote:
>
> 6) linux 2.6.28.4 (vanilla, latest stable): OK!
> >>> thanks closing with appropriate info.
> >> This bug is still present in the current stable kernel.
> >> It only wo
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:26:53 +0200
maximilian attems wrote:
6) linux 2.6.28.4 (vanilla, latest stable): OK!
>>> thanks closing with appropriate info.
>> This bug is still present in the current stable kernel.
>> It only works using modprobe -r iwl3945 and modprobe iwl3945 every time.
> the cu
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > anyway pushed my deb-pkg fixes, happy when things are moving on that
> > front. as this needs to be recommended instead of k-p.
>
> What fixes are those? Do you have any links to them?
yes posted them on linux-kbuild:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=1
Accepted:
atl2-modules-2.6-itanium_2.6.26-6+lenny1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-itanium_2.6.26-6+lenny1_ia64.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-mckinley_2.6.26-6+lenny1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-mckinley_2.6.26-6+lenny1_ia64.deb
at
Accepted:
rt73-modules-2.6-itanium_2.6.26-3+lenny1_ia64.deb
to
pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/rt73-modules-2.6-itanium_2.6.26-3+lenny1_ia64.deb
rt73-modules-2.6-mckinley_2.6.26-3+lenny1_ia64.deb
to
pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/rt73-modules-2.6-mckinley_2.6.26-3+lenny1_i
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> your mail was quite long, i haven't come yet to respond,
> but will tomorrow.
Thanks. I'll delay my upstream changes until then.
> anyway pushed my deb-pkg fixes, happy when things are moving on that
> front. as this needs to be recommended i
54 matches
Mail list logo
