Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: sometimes boot failed, mount: mounting /dev on /root/dev failed: No such file or directory
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 534702 Bug#534702: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: sometimes boot failed, mount: mounting /dev on /root/dev failed: No such file or directory 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to VDR dai \(deb\) d+...@vdr.jp thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?
Christian Perrier wrote: During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised. Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.30 or whatever other funky new version appears soon is not really relevant) is quite hairy. It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability of the kernel team... Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to happen? There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such situations as there is no clear plan of the kernel team to get the remaining issues solved soon after it would be forced in. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to happen? There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such situations as there is no clear plan of the kernel team to get the remaining issues solved soon after it would be forced in. So, could we get some input from the kernel team on this topic, then? Are you guys prioritizing work to get a new kernel in testing or work to get yet another upstream release in unstable? (from the above sentence and the discussion we had during the D-I team meeting, you probably understand where is my own preference going) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#536594: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: PCMCIA failure
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 Version: 2.6.30-1 Severity: normal I've had a problem with my PCMCIA wireless card in 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. On boot, in 2.6.29 I get a kernel panic when the card is detected, and in 2.6.30 it just hangs at that point. If I boot without the card and then insert it, the hardware address is messed up. Instead of 12:34:56:78:9A:BC iwconfig reports it as 12-34-56-78-9A-BC-XX-XX, where the Xs constantly change. That's on eth0; wlan0_rename shows the correct address. The card is an old 802.11b Netgear, with dmesg reporting: [ 12.064260] orinoco_cs 0.15 (David Gibson her...@gibson.dropbear.id.au, Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org, et al) [ 12.300688] eth0: Hardware identity 800c::0001: The system info attached shows my kernel as 2.6.26, because that's the version I have where my wireless works. -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.27 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.93.3 tools for generating an initramfs ii module-init-tools 3.9-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 recommends: ii libc6-i6862.9-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 suggests: ii grub 0.97-53GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v pn linux-doc-2.6.30 none (no description available) -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.30-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.30-1-686: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.30-1-686: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.30-1-686: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.30-1-686: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.30-1-686: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.30-1-686: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.30-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.30-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.30-1-686: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Forcibly switching to PATA/libata
Hi folks I intend to do the switch to PATA in 2.6.31, even if there is nothing to convert the whole shit yet. I'm sick of all the whining. Bastian -- ... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get to know each other. -- Kirk, Elaan of Troyius, stardate 4372.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#465278: Workaround
Hi, For whomever is interested, I just wrote a simple workaround (why didn't I come up with this sooner...). It involves a simple C program + libusb + apm script. http://www.thouters.be/pub/stickies/zappletouch.c -- Thomas Langewouters www: http://www.thouters.be -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability of the kernel team... it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep, that funnily surfaced now on i686. fixed in latest repo and scheduled for upload latest on this upcoming week. Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to happen? There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such situations as there is no clear plan of the kernel team to get the remaining issues solved soon after it would be forced in. without force hints linux-2.6 goes nowhere. what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Forcibly switching to PATA/libata
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 15:13 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks I intend to do the switch to PATA in 2.6.31, even if there is nothing to convert the whole shit yet. I'm sick of all the whining. What do we do about IDE drivers that claim the same device ids? Stop building them? Blacklist them? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings No political challenge can be met by shopping. - George Monbiot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#536594: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: PCMCIA failure
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 09:07 -0400, Mike Marsh wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: normal
I've had a problem with my PCMCIA wireless card in 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
On boot, in 2.6.29 I get a kernel panic when the card is detected, and
in 2.6.30 it just hangs at that point. If I boot without the card and
then insert it, the hardware address is messed up. Instead of
12:34:56:78:9A:BC iwconfig reports it as 12-34-56-78-9A-BC-XX-XX, where
the Xs constantly change. That's on eth0; wlan0_rename shows the correct
address.
eth0 is the wireless master device for the card, which do you not
normally need to concern yourself with. wlan0_rename is the device you
should normally use with iwconfig, ifconfig etc.
You should be able to fix the naming by adding the text:
, ATTR{type}==1
to the line in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules that refers to
this card's MAC address.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
No political challenge can be met by shopping. - George Monbiot
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#536594: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: PCMCIA failure
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ben Hutchingsb...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
You should be able to fix the naming by adding the text:
, ATTR{type}==1
to the line in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules that refers to
this card's MAC address.
Thanks -- that fixes half the problem. I can boot into 2.6.30 without
the card, and on insertion it then initializes the network.
I still have the boot-time problem, though. The last three lines I
get before progress stops are:
hostap_cs: Registered netdevice wifi0
pcmcia: Driver needs updating to support IRQ sharing.
hostap_cs: index 0x01: , irq 3, io 0x2100-0x213f
--
Michael A. Marsh
http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh
http://mamarsh.blogspot.com
http://36pints.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#536534: linux-image-2.6: 2.6.30-1 stuttering video - timer problem on P4 and SIS630 chipset?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 536534 linux-2.6 Bug#536534: linux-image-2.6: 2.6.30-1 stuttering video - timer problem on P4 and SIS630 chipset? Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6' to `linux-2.6'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?
maximilian attems wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability of the kernel team... it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep, that funnily surfaced now on i686. fixed in latest repo and scheduled for upload latest on this upcoming week. Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to happen? There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such situations as there is no clear plan of the kernel team to get the remaining issues solved soon after it would be forced in. without force hints linux-2.6 goes nowhere. If you mean this in general then you are misinformed. If you mean atm, then you know the answer to your following question. what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about? The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Luk Claes wrote: what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about? The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be unblocked. Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing. Also the armel linux-2.6 FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.30-2;arch=armel;stamp=1247068753 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
