Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 517833
Bug #517833 {Done: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org} [linux-2.6] better
document net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 517833 better document net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface
Bug #517833 {Done: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org} [linux-2.6] sysctl
net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface broken
Changed Bug title to 'better document net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface' from
Your message dated Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:10:24 +0200
with message-id 20090816091023.gd11...@lapse.rw.madduck.net
and subject line Re: sysctl net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #517833,
regarding better document net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 517833
Bug #517833 {Done: martin f krafft madd...@debian.org} [linux-2.6] better
document net.ipv?.conf.all.* interface
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hello,
I have a custom linux-source-2.6.18-2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 (just
patched for hardware support etc). I'm concerned with the lastest
CVE-2009-2692 so I would like to update my kernel. As it was a lot of
work to apply the hardware patches to the initial Etch's linux-source,
I wonder
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 12:11 +0200, Vianney Lejeune wrote:
Hello,
I have a custom linux-source-2.6.18-2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 (just
patched for hardware support etc). I'm concerned with the lastest
CVE-2009-2692 so I would like to update my kernel. As it was a lot of
work to apply
Hello,
I have a custom linux-source-2.6.18-2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 (just
patched for hardware support etc). I'm concerned with the lastest
CVE-2009-2692 so I would like to update my kernel. As it was a lot of
work to apply the hardware patches to the initial Etch's linux-
source,
I
1,000,000 GBP has been Awarded to you in our AWARDPROMO Please acknowledge the
receipt in this mail with the details below to us
for more information email
phil.hera...@btinternet.com
Name:
Age:
Country:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
1,000,000 GBP has been Awarded to you in our AWARDPROMO Please acknowledge the
receipt in this mail with the details below to us
for more information email
phil.hera...@btinternet.com
Name:
Age:
Country:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 14:41 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 16:30 +0200, Vianney Lejeune wrote:
Hello,
I have a custom linux-source-2.6.18-2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 (just
patched for hardware support etc). I'm concerned with the lastest
CVE-2009-2692 so I would like to update my kernel. As it was a lot of
work to apply
Hello,
I have a custom linux-source-2.6.18-2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 (just
patched for hardware support etc). I'm concerned with the lastest
CVE-2009-2692 so I would like to update my kernel. As it was a
lot of
work to apply the hardware patches to the initial Etch's linux-
source,
I
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Currently, we are shipping aufs1 in Debian unstable, which is
not supported upstream anymore since January 2009. This is a
bad situation.
We now have 3 options:
1) Ship aufs2 (which requires 18 symbol exports in the kernel)
2) Ship unionfs2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was able to get my hands on another powermac, approximately the same
vintage, to experiment with and discovered that a (locally built) 2.6.25
kernel will boot on it (which is doesn't on my machine, with the oops
assoc with this bug). However it
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Version: 2.6.30-5
Severity: normal
from dmesg, it shows:
radeon_cp: Failed to load firmware radeon/R300_cp.bin
[drm:radeon_do_init_cp] *ERROR* Failed to load firmware!
my laptop's video card is ATI Mobility Radeon X300
when my kernel is 2.6.26, the radeon dri
Upload to ftp.upload.debian.org failed
Error messages:
Could not create file.
The upload will be retried in 0:30:00
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
linux-source-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch3_all.deb has incorrect size;
deleting it
linux-support-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch3_all.deb doesn't exist
linux-tree-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch3_all.deb doesn't exist
/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch3_i386.changes is already present on
target host:
-rw---S--- 1 1518 802 8313 Aug 16 16:54
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch3_i386.changes
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch3_i386.changes
Your message dated Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:31:08 +0100
with message-id 1250443868.21652.189.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#541830: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: Failed to load
firmware radeon/R300_cp.bin
has caused the Debian Bug report #541830,
regarding linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: Failed to
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
I am ready to apply this change but I am unsure about a detail: is
there any reason to run udevadm settle a second time before
scsi_wait_scan is loaded?
You told me it was racy to check for /sys/bus/scsi otherwise, see
There are also some potentially disruptive changes that have already
happened since lenny:
Separation of firmware
This will cause some regressions in hardware support if people do not
install the separate firmware package(s). Users need to be made aware
of this at upgrade time. There is a bug
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3_all.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
After doing a lspci -vt and noticing the extra video card that I've
not used for years, i.e. forgot totally about it, I tried the 2.6.25
kernel with the extra video card removed (0001:11:04.0). It booted just
fine.
Then I installed the recent
[ don't drop bug report on cc, this is not a private communication ]
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 07:00:11PM +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
Version: 0.93.3
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 06:01:16PM +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version:
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3.dsc: old version (2.6.18.dfsg.1-26)
in oldstable-proposed-updates = new version (2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch3) targeted
at oldstable-proposed-updates.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 541864 patch
Bug #541864 [initramfs-tools] [PATCH] write blacklisted modules to
/etc/modprobe.d/initramfs.conf
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: initramfs-tools
Newer modprobe will only look at .conf files.
---
scripts/init-premount/blacklist |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/init-premount/blacklist b/scripts/init-premount/blacklist
index 1dd9dbc..2164906 100755
---
To have it take effect as early as possible.
Signed-off-by: Tormod Volden debian.tor...@gmail.com
---
Now that I am looking at it, wouldn't it make sense to build the
blacklist file already in init-top? I don't see why init-premount
was chosen instead, but maybe I am missing something.
This
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Severity: normal
fixed 534635 2.6.30-2
thanks
I think we can mark this bug fixed, since the mentioned commit was included in
2.6.30.1 and thus in the -2 debian package.
I'm still seeing the occasional xorg crash after resuming - most often like one
minute after
1,000,000 GBP has been Awarded to you in our AWARDPROMO Please acknowledge the
receipt in this mail with the details below to us
for more information email
phil.hera...@btinternet.com
Name:
Age:
Country:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
1,000,000 GBP has been Awarded to you in our AWARDPROMO Please acknowledge the
receipt in this mail with the details below to us
for more information email
phil.hera...@btinternet.com
Name:
Age:
Country:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
tags 464197 + pending
Bug #464197 [linux-2.6] snd-cs46xx.ko module seems to be missing from
linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Bug #430017 [linux-2.6] kernel: Recording silence,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'linux-image-2.6.30-1-686'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-image-2.6.30-1-686'
Severity: normal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to
After some updates in Lenny this bug is disappear.
At now module loads normally without errors:
$ sudo modprobe ip_queue
WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-kernel-nkc, it
will be ignored in a future release.
I think we can close this bug.
36 matches
Mail list logo
