Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick).
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
(with many many suspend-resume
Your message dated Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:20:05 +0200
with message-id 20090910092005.gn21...@baikonur.stro.at
and subject line Re: Bug#545920: 'W: Possible missing firmware ... for module
e100' even though e100 isn't loaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #545920,
regarding 'W: Possible missing
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.26+17+lenny1
Severity: normal
On my laptop Asus A6L the module 'video' from the acpi subsystem
always craches with the official kernel image 2.6-686. The relevant
system message is reproduced below. This has bin so ever since I
conducted a distupgrade
Hey Guys,
New testing perfomed. I checked your Lenny. The bug still occurs.
Man, you know Debian Lenny is called Stable. So what's going on? When will
have no problems with hardware under Linux? I mean there is so much to do.
I have an old PC, I also have a problem with my pcmcia that are not
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
And in 2.6.31-rc6, KMS is not stable enought to be used for my day-to-day
work. It even leads to data corruption. See #545517
Since I remove KMS (ie since my bug report), I had no problem at all
(with many
Your message dated Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:13:44 +0200
with message-id 20090910121343.ga17...@inutil.org
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: IBM ThinkPad T42p: random
freezes at shutdown
has caused the Debian Bug report #516461,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: IBM ThinkPad T42p: random
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 545961 linux-2.6
Bug #545961 [linux-image-2.6-686] linux-image-2.6-686: acpi video module can
create duplicate proc dir entries
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6-686' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 545961 linux-image-2.6-686: acpi video module can create duplicate
proc dir entries
Bug #545961 [linux-image-2.6-686] linux-image-2.6-686: acpi-module video always
crashes
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6-686: acpi video module can
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 12:02 +0200, yellow protoss wrote:
Hey Guys,
New testing perfomed. I checked your Lenny. The bug still occurs.
Man, you know Debian Lenny is called Stable. So what's going on?
stable means we don't change it much, not that we are sure it will be
stable or functional
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-5
Severity: normal
Since 2.6.30, the information in /proc/uptime has changed. It used to
contain the system uptime and the system idle time, in seconds. Now it
contains the system uptime and something else.
$ cat /proc/uptime
1626.63 4.51
reportbug is complicated and I can't get this bug number
below is the output when I try to sync system time to hardware clock.
Current I write a time setting command in rc.local which make some
application work and then re-adjust after boot, but it is really
inconvinient.
debian:~# hwclock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Moritz Muehlenhoff schrieb:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:59:05PM +0100, Juergen Kosel wrote:
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1~lenny1
Severity: normal
Hello,
since the update of xine-ui 0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1 to
Am Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:33:54 +0200 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff
j...@inutil.org:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 04:20:59AM +0200, Christoph Franzen wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-15lenny2
Severity: important
I'm using Lenny (AMD64 with proposed updates) on a HP
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:10:47PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
When I manually set it to rate 11M, the reported bit rate goes to 11M,
the real download speed improves by about 50% and the link quality
goes to about 70%,
Hello,
I'm trying to trace a kernel quirk on an embedded system. I found a
debian bug report (#496850) stating that the bug I'm looking at exists in
linux-image-2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2 but was not found in 2.6.18.dfsg-1-22.
I'd like to compare the two to find the cause of the issue.
I have been
This problem is still there with linux-2.6/2.6.26-19 from Debian
release 5.0.3.
--
Arcady Genkin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 21:00, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:34:15PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hello Maximilian,
I'm not quite happy with your downgrade of #499198 to important since
this (together with #499046 and #498328) is a clear regretion from
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:02:29PM +0200, Ico Doornekamp wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to trace a kernel quirk on an embedded system. I found a
debian bug report (#496850) stating that the bug I'm looking at exists in
linux-image-2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2 but was not found in 2.6.18.dfsg-1-22.
I'd
* On 2009-09-10 dann frazier da...@dannf.org wrote :
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:02:29PM +0200, Ico Doornekamp wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to trace a kernel quirk on an embedded system. I found a
debian bug report (#496850) stating that the bug I'm looking at exists in
since a week or so I am unable to update the repository on
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/.
Could not yet find any reason. Has it moved?
Do you have a hint?
Hi,
Any news on this? The kernel-archive was a very valuable resource, it
would be a shame to see it gone.
(I'm adding
Your message dated Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:42:04 +0200
with message-id 20090910204204.gc17...@inutil.org
and subject line Re: linux-image: kernel oops with debian-live and aufs,
unionfs based on lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #510573,
regarding linux-image: kernel oops with debian-live and
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:04:03PM -0500, Jerome wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-11
Severity: important
My two SAMSUNG HA250JC hard drives were working fine until apt-get upgraded
the kernel from 2.6.25-2 to 2.6.26-1 (Debian testing).
Both hard drives are
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54:01AM -0500, Jeff Green wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.26-11
Severity: important
As the subject says, I get an Oops at boot time. At present, the only
reliable kernel that I have is 2.6.24. I have one of those circa 2000
power macs.
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #541677 (http://bugs.debian.org/541677)
# *
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-6
Severity: normal
During the last boot, a DHCP server has been started even though there
is no Ethernet cable plugged in. This problem did not occur during the
previous boot, even though the conditions were (almost) the same. I've
attached the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6
tags 545981 + pending
Bug #545981 [linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: Wrong data
in /proc/uptime
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 545981 upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #545981 [linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: Wrong data
in /proc/uptime
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 15:39 +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-5
Severity: normal
Since 2.6.30, the information in /proc/uptime has changed. It used to
contain the system uptime and the system idle time, in seconds. Now it
contains the system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 546041 upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #546041 [linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: DHCP
server started by ifup -a even though no Ethernet cable has been plugged in
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
End of message,
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 23:11 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-6
Severity: normal
During the last boot, a DHCP server has been started even though there
is no Ethernet cable plugged in.
You mean DHCP client?
[...]
So, it seems that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6
tags 546041 + pending
Bug #546041 [linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: DHCP
server started by ifup -a even though no Ethernet cable has been plugged
Hi,
I was just checking the debian 50r1 ISO and it seems that you don't ship
a 32bit PAE kernel with it ?
I saw these 2 32 bit kernels
linux-image-2.6.26-2-486_2.6.26-15_i386.deb
NOHIGHMEM
linux-image-2.6.26-2-486_2.6.26-15_i386.deb
has HIGHMEM4G set.
Can you please tell me if there is a
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:47 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
Hi,
I was just checking the debian 50r1 ISO and it seems that you don't ship
a 32bit PAE kernel with it ?
I saw these 2 32 bit kernels
linux-image-2.6.26-2-486_2.6.26-15_i386.deb
NOHIGHMEM
Dear Moritz,
Can you give us a status update please? Is this fixed upstream
in the mean time? If not, did you submit your patches and was
there any feedback?
I believe this issue has been fixed upstream, as per comment
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406902#29
I guess they
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-19
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Like #517449 bug, but with IO on a ncpfs.
This bug increase load average (sendmail stopped etc).
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian
37 matches
Mail list logo
