Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 10:04 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
as if my kernel was NOT Xen dom0 capable. But I've checked my .config,
and I did switch the correct flag(s). Also, there's a /proc/xen (but
empty). What did I miss here?
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 10:04 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
as if my kernel was NOT Xen dom0 capable. But I've checked my .config,
and I did switch the correct flag(s). Also, there's a /proc/xen (but
empty). What
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
in this post by Ted Tso:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354#c149
one can read the following sentence:
Distributions that want to be extra paranoid should store fsck
and all of its needed files in the initrd,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:16:32AM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
in this post by Ted Tso:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354#c149
one can read the following sentence:
Distributions that want to be extra paranoid should store fsck
and all of its needed files in the
Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test.
I used to run the 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 dom0, and it was quite fast. Since
I am using that new version, I really have the bad feeling that my
computer is A LOT slower than before. It used to be nearly as fast as
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 19:41 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test.
I used to run the 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 dom0, and it was quite fast. Since
I am using that new version, I really have the bad feeling that my
computer
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Severity: normal
My standard Dell USB mouse labelled Optical Wheel Mouse does not wok in xorg,
nor in console with gpm and the /dev/input/mice device.
I tried to cat /dev/input/mice but nothing happens when I use the mouse.
I tried to log what happened when I
I forgot the attachments
(Remember for later : never use the gtk version of reportbug)
Thomas
dmesg-insert_mouse.log
Description: Binary data
lshal_dellmouse.log
Description: Binary data
udevadm_monitor.log
Description: Binary data
udevadm_test_mouse.log
Description: Binary data
Package: grub2
Version: 1.97-1
Severity: wishlist
please provide hook scripts in /etc/kernel/{prerm,postinst}.d
instead of using the deprecated /etc/kerne-img.conf file.
guess they could just be symlinks to update-grub?
thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:05:32PM -0600, Wes Keene wrote:
I've noticed recently that ftp.debian.org no longer produces new
kernel deb's. I do use these to get newer kernel features, but I'm
fine with the latest 2.6.30.8 for now. Is there any particular reason
this is happening? I realize
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1
Severity: important
After upgrade to kernel 2.6.31 (from 2.6.30), wireless card stopped
working. It seems to be set up fine, associates with AP but it is unable
to communicate. Ping or any other network communication doesn't work.
After reboot to 2.6.30,
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 16:05 -0600, Wes Keene wrote:
I've noticed recently that ftp.debian.org no longer produces new
kernel deb's. I do use these to get newer kernel features, but I'm
fine with the latest 2.6.30.8 for now. Is there any particular reason
this is happening?
We have uploaded
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 11:41 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
no way.
Could you please elaborate why ?
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:36:58 +0100
with message-id 20091103213658.ga32...@galadriel.inutil.org
and subject line Re: Bug#553520: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: Volume harshly
drops after kernel update
has caused the Debian Bug report #553520,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64:
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: important
Hi
When I try to build eclipse 3.5 from source the compile is usually interrupted
by the kernel deferencing
a NULL pointer in (as far as I can tell) my file system driver. I do not see this during
normal usage[1].
The
The problem is gone on version 2.6.31-1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
And another crash today, slightly different:
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (ff188600)
(XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#1) crashed on cpu#1:
(XEN) [ Xen-3.2-1 x86_32p debug=n Not tainted ]
(XEN) CPU:1
(XEN) EIP:0061:[c01013a7]
(XEN) EFLAGS: 0246 CONTEXT: guest
(XEN)
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 07:05:16PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 11:41 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
no way.
Could you please elaborate why ?
people want to cram all kind of things that don't belong
into initramfs.
fsck is a clear example of a duty that has to be
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:02:07PM +, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
I would like to help the kernel team. I usually try out kernels as
soon as they are built, and have several machines on which to try
them with various hardware. I've noticed that builds have recently
stopped of newer
Further information:
I've tried to set up WPA in my network and the card started to work
well. So the problem appears only with WEP.
--
Michal Kašpar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I've noticed recently that ftp.debian.org no longer produces new kernel deb's.
I do use these to get newer kernel features, but I'm fine with the latest
2.6.30.8 for now. Is there any particular reason this is happening? I realize
the kernel team is quite busy and it's also quite a tight
Hum ... I posted the bug with an older version of the kernel and mixed up
the kernel versions while posted the bugreport.
I tried with all the following versions of the kernel :
* 2.6.30-1-686 #1 SMP
* 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP (but it warns me at boot time that the kernel is
two old for this
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:51:08PM +0100, Thomas Douillard wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Severity: normal
[...]
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
[...]
This kernel version is no longer in Debian. Please upgrade to the current
version and test whether that fixes the
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 20:18 +0100, Michal Kašpar wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1
Severity: important
After upgrade to kernel 2.6.31 (from 2.6.30), wireless card stopped
working. It seems to be set up fine, associates with AP but it is unable
to communicate. Ping or any other
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:05:32PM -0600, Wes Keene wrote:
I've noticed recently that ftp.debian.org no longer produces new
kernel deb's. I do use these to get newer kernel features, but I'm
fine with the latest 2.6.30.8 for now. Is there any particular
reason this is happening? I realize
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:03:38PM +0100, Thomas Douillard wrote:
Hum ... I posted the bug with an older version of the kernel and mixed up
the kernel versions while posted the bugreport.
I tried with all the following versions of the kernel :
* 2.6.30-1-686 #1 SMP
* 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP
Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 19:41 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
Yes. http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test.
I used to run the 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 dom0, and it was quite fast. Since
I am using that new version, I really have the bad feeling
27 matches
Mail list logo
