Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

reassign 559069 linux-2.6 thanks On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:46:15AM +0530, Mohan R wrote: > package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 > severity 559069 wishlist > thanks > > dann frazier wrote: >> As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still >> available in the distribution. It

Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 severity 559069 wishlist thanks dann frazier wrote: As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still available in the distribution. It can be a wishlist bug if a package doesn't work w/ a newer compiler, but it won't be a candidate for a s

Bug#559069: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:26:21 -0700 with message-id <20091202062621.gc21...@lackof.org> and subject line fixed in 2.6.28-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #559069, regarding linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3? to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Re: Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 559069 linux-2.6 Bug #559069 [linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64] linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3? Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64' to 'linux-2.6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Processed: Re: Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64' Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64' > severity 559069 wishlist Bug #559069 [linux-he

Processed: tagging 558426

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 558426 + pending Bug #558426 [linux-image-2.6-686] atl1e performance problems with native IPv6 Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#558426: [PATCH net-next]atl1e:disable NETIF_F_TSO6 for hardware limit

From: Jie Yang For hardware limit to support TSOV6, just disable this feature Signed-off-by: Jie Yang --- drivers/net/atl1e/atl1e_main.c | 36 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/atl1e/atl1e_main.c b/drivers/net/atl

Bug#558426: TSOv6 broken in atl1e

On Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:20 AM Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I received a bug report that > shows atl1e corrupting IPv6 packets. I have reproduced this > on an Eee PC 901 and found that it is linked to TSO. The > most obvious thing wrong with the driver code

Bug#548749: marked as done ([firmware-iwlwifi] Wifi connection error after some minutes)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:38:20 +0100 with message-id <20091201223820.ga4...@galadriel.inutil.org> and subject line Re: [firmware-iwlwifi] Wifi connection error after some minutes has caused the Debian Bug report #548749, regarding [firmware-iwlwifi] Wifi connection error after some min

Processing of redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.changes

redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1.dsc redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1+lenny1.diff.gz cman_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.deb libcman2_2.20081102-1+lenny1_i386.deb libcman-dev_2.20081102-1+lenn

Bug#504391: [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are assumed removable

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:32:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:42 +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote: ... > > I'm running 2.6.32-rc7 with this patch applied and > > CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y > > That works as desired for my non-removable case. Is it desired that I > > test

Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:59PM +0530, Mohan R wrote: > Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 > Severity: minor > > > Hi, > > A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to > compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page. > While installing linux-he

Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 Severity: minor Hi, A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page. While installing linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64, I noticed that it depends on gcc-4.1, but when I inst

Processing of redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1_i386.changes

redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1.dsc redhat-cluster_2.20081102-1.1.diff.gz cman_2.20081102-1.1_i386.deb libcman2_2.20081102-1.1_i386.deb libcman-dev_2.20081102-1.1_i386.deb libdlm2_2.2008110

Bug#559064: marked as done (new pciid for hpilo)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:41:45 -0700 with message-id <20091201174145.gb14...@lackof.org> and subject line fixed in 2.6.29-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #559064, regarding new pciid for hpilo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: tagging 559064

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 559064 + pending Bug #559064 [linux-2.6] new pciid for hpilo Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#516374: Have the same bugs in Debian Lenny with OpenVZ

On Monday 30 November 2009 09:23:48 pm kay wrote: > Debian Lenny freezes for about 10-15 minutes, and I can not log in via SSH. Hello! How did you obtain this log ? Can you try to use netconsole to catch a whole kernel log? > > uname -a > Linux dc 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:06:00

Bug#559064: new pciid for hpilo

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-20 Severity: important Tags: lenny This change from upstream simply adds a new pci id (well, and revs the module version - I'll probably use 0.06lenny1 instead of 1.0 though). Author: David Altobelli Date: Fri Feb 27 14:03:09 2009 -0800 hpilo: new pci de

Processed: forcibly merging 559049 559041

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > forcemerge 559049 559041 Bug#559049: linux-image-2.6.31-1-686: freezes in connection with xserver-xorg-video-ati / xserver-xorg-video-radeon Bug#559041: Subject: linux-i

Bug#507271: Is that the final solution?

Is installing grub-pc the proper solution to this problem. I'm having similar failed with status 1 error as described in the bug. I just want to make sure installing grub-pc won't cause more problems. Thanks, Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#559049: linux-image-2.6.31-1-686: freezes in connection with xserver-xorg-video-ati / xserver-xorg-video-radeon

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.31-2 Severity: normal With respect to bug 552324, Brice Goglin suggests that it may be a bug in the kernel - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552324#10 When switching to graphics mode (for example when starting Gnome) it freezes and even switch

Bug#435387: Redirect to Kernel?

Patrik Schindler writes: > Good point. But Token Ring Card drivers already exist, even if there > is likely not a very much bigger demand. :-) Well, they do exist but they are probably going away too. I don't see anyone really interested in hacking on them, so they are staying just as long as t

Bug#559041: Subject: linux-image-2.6.31-1-686: freezes with xserver-xorg-video-ati

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.31-2 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** The kernel freezes, it is even impossible to switch to the console, when using the Xserver packages for radeon / ati It may be a bug of the X server, but Brice Goglin suggests in message

Bug#435387: Redirect to Kernel?

Am 01.12.2009 um 13:14 schrieb Bjørn Mork: I just noticed this bug report, and couldn't let be commenting... I believe "buried in ddp.c" is a little unprecise. I didn't look myself yet, just repeated what Didier wrote. Sorry for that. ddp.c implements the EtherTalk Link Access Protoc

Bug#435387: Redirect to Kernel?

I just noticed this bug report, and couldn't let be commenting... I believe "buried in ddp.c" is a little unprecise. ddp.c implements the EtherTalk Link Access Protocol (ELAP). See the header of net/appletalk/ddp.c: * DDP:An implementation of the AppleTalk DDP protocol for *