Bug#570321: hangs while installing

2010-03-19 Thread Jayen Ashar
Sorry for not replying sooner, somehow missed your email. It seems to have reappeared. I'm just going to blacklist the amd64_agp module for now. Here's the oops: Feb 9 13:25:40 riker kernel: [3.532480] Oops: [#1] SMP Feb 9 13:25:40 riker kernel: [3.532558] last sysfs file:

Bug#574553: Grub files and fstab

2010-03-19 Thread Jesús Ángel del Pozo Domínguez
*/boot/grub/grub.cfg* # # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE # # It is automatically generated by /usr/sbin/grub-mkconfig using templates # from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub # ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ### if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then load_env fi set default=0 if [

Bug#574526: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: iwlagn flood in dmesg: free more than tfds_in_queue

2010-03-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Ben, there is patch pending in wireless-2.6 master GIT branch [1]: commit c8406ea8fa1adde8dc5400127281d497bbcdb84a iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message Also, it would be fine to see [2.6.32] iwlwifi: fix nfreed-- in debian's 2.6.32 kernel. Kind Regards, - Sedat - [1]

Bug#574526: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: iwlagn flood in dmesg: free more than tfds_in_queue

2010-03-19 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:15:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 21:05 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-10 Severity: normal Hi, it looks like the following upstream commits lead to those repeated messages, as soon as there's

Bug#574598: openvz kernel doesn't work and spams into dmesg: NULL exec env (timr-it_process-ve_task_info.owner_env)

2010-03-19 Thread unera
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 Severity: important Version: 2.6.32-10 I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test. But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg messages: [ 482.069225] posix_timer_event: NULL exec env

Bug#574348: similar crash on a different host

2010-03-19 Thread Lukas Kolbe
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.33-1 Hi again, we've just seen a very similar crash on a different host with 2.6.33-1. After the last trace, the machine crashed. I'll report this to upstream bugzilla as well and let you know about the bugnumber. Mar 18 20:11:22 simon kernel: [87960.628069]

Bug#574348: upstream bug

2010-03-19 Thread Lukas Kolbe
reported to bugzilla.kernel.org as https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578 thanks, Lukas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#574526: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message not needed

2010-03-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
Just FYI. - Sedat - -- Forwarded message -- From: Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com Date: Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message To: sedat.di...@gmail.com Cc: Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com, reinette chatre

Bug#470474: Info received (Bug#470474: cpufrequtils: Laptop limited to 1.2GHz vs 2.2GHz, when no battery, running on AC only.)

2010-03-19 Thread User X
Hi, I apologize for my previous post. Based on this post: http://en.community.dell.com/forums/p/7590995/7816851.aspx, I'm (again) almost certain that this issue is related to a laptop's manufacturer trick to prevent damage to their components from excess heat (think of warranty); (maybe

Bug#565790: [stable] [ltp] Re: Bug#565790: cat /proc/acpi/ibm/video and must press power button

2010-03-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:53:57PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:

Processed: Re: Bug#574348: upstream bug

2010-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 574348 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578 Bug #574348 [linux-2.6] Kernel 2.6.32-9: crash Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#574598: openvz kernel doesn't work and spams into dmesg: NULL exec env (timr-it_process-ve_task_info.owner_env)

2010-03-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:24:18PM +0300, un...@debian.org wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 Severity: important Version: 2.6.32-10 I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test. But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg messages: [

Bug#574598: openvz kernel doesn't work and spams into dmesg: NULL exec env (timr-it_process-ve_task_info.owner_env)

2010-03-19 Thread unera
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 Severity: important Version: 2.6.32-10 I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test. But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg messages: [ 482.069225] posix_timer_event: NULL exec env

Bug#574630: linux-base: postinst fails if udev's persistent-cd.rules has duplicates

2010-03-19 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: linux-base Version: 2.6.32-10 Severity: serious Due to some old bug in udev, my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules had a number of duplicate rules (timestamp on the file suggests it might have been #374539). This leads to an error in linux-base.postinst: Modification of

Bug#565797: is this bug related to 10480

2010-03-19 Thread Paolo Sala
Hi, I fear this bug has been already opened in kernel.org. This is the link of the bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10480 Until now there is no solution... I'm very afraid Piviul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#574598: openvz kernel doesn't work and spams into dmesg: NULL exec env (timr-it_process-ve_task_info.owner_env)

2010-03-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:06:21PM +0300, un...@debian.org wrote: I tested in my _desktop_ system: i have to have headers package to use nvidia drivers :( you can test the bug on single user, no need to use xorg afais. also: # LANG=C dpkg -i

Processed: Re: Bug#565797: is this bug related to 10480

2010-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 565797 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10480 Bug #565797 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-686] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: EXT3-fs error on sata SiI 3114 controller Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#572488: linux-image-2.6.33: fails to boot

2010-03-19 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 03/07/2010 04:08 PM, maximilian attems wrote: On Fri, 05 Mar 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote: I somewhat doubt that the network drivers load at the point the kernel reboots. They are compiled as modules and probably not present in the initrd at all. However, I tried to recycle the

Bug#504805: updated kernel packages for lenny?

2010-03-19 Thread Justin Azoff
I'm very glad to see that this bug is resolved and that there has been a huge ammount of progress made on xen in debian :-) How should one go about using these packages on lenny? Should one attempt to install linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 directly in lenny, or will images be uploaded to the

Bug#504805: updated kernel packages for lenny?

2010-03-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:14:26PM -0400, Justin Azoff wrote: I'm very glad to see that this bug is resolved and that there has been a huge ammount of progress made on xen in debian :-) well i wouldn't bet on that. it is more that nobody cared about the Lenny xen bugs. How should one go

Bug#574657: linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64: Suspend/resume causes all programs to crash with an ld.so assertion in elf_machine_rela_relative: ((reloc-r_info) 0xffffffff) == 8

2010-03-19 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2 Severity: important I normally use uswsusp. I recently wanted to try the kernel's built-in hibernation support to see if it had improved. I removed uswsusp, and tried hibernating and resuming. As a minor issue, I noticed that the built-in

Bug#572488: linux-image-2.6.33: fails to boot

2010-03-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote: I found the config change which breaks the kernel. A kernel which differs from the official one only in this does boot, the official one does not. I am quite sure there are no messages to see, this only affects very early stages of boot as the