On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
reassign 579017 linux-2.6 2.6.32-9
kthxbye
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 15:27:11 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: normal
Without giving the explicit
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
This might or might not be related. I have split it off as bug #580068.
Please use 'reportbug -N 580068' to add information about the network
configuration for your computer.
After some more testing I noticed that the
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+26_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+26_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.32+26_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.32+26_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686_2.6.32+26_i386.deb
to
Accepted:
linux-doc-2.6_27_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc-2.6_27_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+27_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+27_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.32+27_i386.deb
to
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2010 11:19:18 +
with message-id e1o9g9m-0006vp...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#347284: fixed in linux-latest-2.6 26
has caused the Debian Bug report #347284,
regarding linux-doc-2.6.14: get the latest linux-doc
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2010 11:19:18 +
with message-id e1o9g9m-0006vp...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#347284: fixed in linux-latest-2.6 26
has caused the Debian Bug report #347284,
regarding linux-doc-2.6.24: inconsistency between image/headers virtual package
and doc virtual
Accepted:
firmware-bnx2_0.24_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.24_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.24_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.24_all.deb
firmware-intelwimax_0.24_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-intelwimax_0.24_all.deb
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2010 11:32:28 +
with message-id e1o9gmw-bf...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#574145: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #574145,
regarding confusing use of debconf for license agreement
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2010 11:32:28 +
with message-id e1o9gmw-bk...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#576104: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #576104,
regarding extra copyright file should include rlc.bin files
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2010 11:32:28 +
with message-id e1o9gmw-bp...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#579694: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #579694,
regarding firmware-nonfree: Please include rtl8192su/ r8192s_usb firmware into
the
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2010 11:32:28 +
with message-id e1o9gmw-bz...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#573950: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #573950,
regarding Please include RTL8192E firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
I regularly follow testing's upgrades. So I was with 2.6.30, the sensors
were working fine. I got 2.6.32-3 sensors broken. And I must wait until
2.6.32-12 (!) to get it working again? Why doesn't a patch slip into
2.6.32-3 ??
Am I missing something?
With real respect to your job,
Giorgos
Package: linux-source-2.6.32
Version: 2.6.32-12
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
A second hard disk is installed on my computer as an external usb device.
Since the last kernel update (either using an official debian kernel-image
or a locally compiled kernel from debian sources), mounting of this disk
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 580214 - sid
Bug #580214 [linux-source-2.6.32] linux-image-2.6.32-5: cannot mount (or fsck)
a usb disk at boot time
Removed tag(s) sid.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:23:20PM +0300, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
I regularly follow testing's upgrades. So I was with 2.6.30, the sensors
were working fine. I got 2.6.32-3 sensors broken. And I must wait until
2.6.32-12 (!) to get it working again? Why doesn't a patch slip into
2.6.32-3
will upload 2.6.33 to experimental tomorrow after 12 UT.
phylib has a current trouble to compile,
any other outstanding issues?
plan is that to be the last 2.6.33 and then move on to
2.6.34 to provide testers with really the latest linux-2.6.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 26/04/10 at 21:01 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to
sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the
kernels and upload from, replacing kernel-archive.buildserver.net ?
The easiest fix is the
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
will upload 2.6.33 to experimental tomorrow after 12 UT.
phylib has a current trouble to compile,
Now fixed.
any other outstanding issues?
I suspect there are some other patches that should be copied from sid.
plan is that to
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 13:46 +0300, Juha wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
This might or might not be related. I have split it off as bug #580068.
Please use 'reportbug -N 580068' to add information about the network
configuration for your
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 12:19 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 15:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Please report this upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org under
product 'Power Management, component 'cpufreq'. Let us know the bug
number so that we can track it.
On Sat, 1 May 2010 23:08:54 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:43:10PM -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
In response to your query; I don't have the Logitech mouse anymore
but I just tested and Microsoft mice don't work so it probably is
still not
21 matches
Mail list logo
