Package: linux-tools-2.6
Severity: normal
$ sudo aptitude install linux-tools-2.6
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-tools-2.6 linux-tools-2.6.32{ab}
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 409 not upgraded.
Need to get 291kB of archives. After unpacking 549kB
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 590226 linux-2.6
Bug #590226 [linux-tools-2.6] linux-tools-2.6: uninstallable
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-tools-2.6' to 'linux-2.6'.
retitle 590226 linux-tools-2.6: depends on specific versions of binutils
Bug #590226 [linux-2.6]
Op 20100724 om 17:03 schreef Archive Administrator:
linux-source-2.6.35_2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.35_2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
(new) linux-support-2.6.35-rc6_2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb optional
devel
AFAIK is now
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Okay, so linux-2.6 is now part of a much larger bunch of tightly coupled
packages.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils?
It uses libbfd.
Okay, so linux-2.6
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:30:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Would it be possible to link it against libbfd.a instead?
I would just merge it into linux-kbuild-2.6, the only package building
userspace binaries.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, Mirror,
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: normal
Hello,
I did not manage to use my PCI wireless card RTL8191SE with linux-
image-2.6.32-5-amd64 version 2.6.32-18.
The commad modprobe r8192_pci does not bring device to life.
Note that I did install the firmware-realtek package version
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 15:30 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
With the built-in radeonfb and KMS enabled by default, DRM is broken on eMacs.
See e.g. FDO#27502 [1].
Disabling KMS in /etc/modprobe.d/radeon-kms.conf works around the issue.
Not sure what a real fix would be in this case - is there a framebuffer driver
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:11:37 +0100
with message-id 1280077897.4915.41.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#584744: linux-2.6: built-in radeonfb breaks DRM
has caused the Debian Bug report #584744,
regarding linux-2.6: radeonfb builtin on sparc and powerpc
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# oops
reopen 584744
Bug #584744 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [linux-2.6] linux-2.6:
radeonfb builtin on sparc and powerpc
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
584744:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:51:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Only because it's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that
causes
initramfs-tools to be pulled into the essential set (which I do not),
this
is a cdebootstrap bug for
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:27:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:51:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Only because it's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that
causes
initramfs-tools to be pulled into the essential set (which I do not),
this
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:57:14PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe since awk is essential by way of being a pre-depends of base-files
both mawk and gawk should behave as if they were essential.
No.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: minor
I'm getting this warning for quite a while now, but not on every boot.
Stack traces below ide_pci_init_two differ slightly. I've also tried
the current experimental kernel, but the warning is still there (although
the stack trace is somewhat
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 18:43, Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
First of all, I would like to know if anybody was able to fix this
problem that got kinda lost in the thread:
I can't reproduce this on 2.6.35-rc1+
Can you please test a 2.6.35-rc version? If you can still
17 matches
Mail list logo
