Bug#595103: xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21

2010-09-01 Thread jidanni
BH == Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: BH On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:38 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: important Upon upgrading to -21 xdm nor nodm will not start. -20 worked fine. /var/log/Xorg.0.log says (EE) open

Bug#595103: xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21

2010-09-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 17:35:01 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: BH == Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: BH On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:38 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: important Upon upgrading to -21 xdm nor nodm will

Bug#595103: xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21

2010-09-01 Thread jidanni
forcemerge 594623 595103 thanks Also even before starting X the screen blanks for a few milliseconds every few minutes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#595103: xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21

2010-09-01 Thread jidanni
JC That sounds like #594623. I forcemerged them. But --- Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged Which is good because actually I note that both old and new xserver-xorg-video-intel work with the -20 kernel, but none work with the -21 kernel. So I conclude that it is the

Processed: tagging 595103

2010-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 595103 experimental Bug #595103 [linux-2.6] xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21 Added tag(s) experimental. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#595146: linux-image: kernel segfault when changing ipv6 address

2010-09-01 Thread Robert Vojcik
Package: linux-image Version: 2.6.34 Severity: normal Hello, I use debian lenny and when I do these steps kernel always segfault. 1. configure your /etc/network/interfaces add inet6 adres with /52 netmask and restart networking 2. change your /etc/network/interfaces change mask to 64 3.

Processed: Re: Bug#595146: linux-image: kernel segfault when changing ipv6 address

2010-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 595146 linux-2.6 Bug #595146 [linux-image] linux-image: kernel segfault when changing ipv6 address Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image' Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image' to 'linux-2.6'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#595146: linux-image: kernel segfault when changing ipv6 address

2010-09-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:33:10PM +0200, Robert Vojcik wrote: Package: linux-image Version: 2.6.34 Severity: normal This version is not present in any Debian suite. Please re-test with an official Debian kernel image or a kernel built from the current Debian-packaged kernel source. Ben.

Processed: tagging 595146

2010-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 595146 moreinfo Bug #595146 [linux-2.6] linux-image: kernel segfault when changing ipv6 address Added tag(s) moreinfo. End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#589179: Hello dear

2010-09-01 Thread nelly mbaye
Hello dear My name is Miss nelly, I got your contact and I am interested to know you and be friendly with you. I would appreciate if we get acquainted as soon as possible, you can contact me through my private e-mail stated below so we can know us better. My private e-mail:

Bug#594742: Fixed!

2010-09-01 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
Hi, Thanks Ben, updating to that version of the kernel package in unstable indeed fixes the problem! :) At least, I haven't been able to trigger it anymore, but I only tested for a short time. If I see it happening again, I'll report back, of course. -- Kind regards, Manuel -- To

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-09-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 05:33 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:50 +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: [...] Ok cool. Just to summarize, these seem to be the only drm patches which are currently in your tree and not in our 2.6.32-drm33: [-+] drm/radeon/kms: add additional quirk

Bug#594742: marked as done (linux-2.6: clock_gettime not monotonic)

2010-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:34:23 +0100 with message-id 1283369663.5323.276.ca...@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#594742: Fixed! has caused the Debian Bug report #594742, regarding linux-2.6: clock_gettime not monotonic to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#595187: linux-2.6: lots of OOPses on resume (NULL pointer dereference in file_ra_state_init)

2010-09-01 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Source: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: normal Hi, Since the upgrade from 2.6.32-20 - 2.6.32-21, my laptop fails to resume properly into Xorg : the cursor only appears when I move it and there is nothing much more I can do than switching to the console, login as root and reboot. In the

Bug#576274: More of the same

2010-09-01 Thread Malte Schmidt-Tychsen
Hi there, I just wanted to report further crashes with the current Squeeze kernel. Crashes happened after four pm-suspend and resume and about 4 hours of work. Log output as follows: Machine still Thinkpad X41 with the Intel GMA900. All settings pretty much default. /var/log/syslog Sep 1

Bug#594886: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Computer freeze on network traffic

2010-09-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:27 +0200, Marcos García Ochoa wrote: El 30/08/2010 18:15, Ben Hutchings escribió: Yes, this is a good point. Can you test with our kernel version 2.6.35, available from experimental? Ben. DHCP seems to work ok, but transfers freeze the computer (I tried

Bug#583849: Why wontfix?

2010-09-01 Thread Josh Triplett
Hi, I noticed that you tagged bug 583849 as wontfix, but you didn't post any explanation of that tag to the bug. Mind elaborating on the reason for the wontfix? Thanks, Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processed: tagging 579017

2010-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 579017 + pending Bug #579017 [linux-2.6] autodetection fails when booting with 64-bit kernel on 32-bit userland Bug #595003 [linux-2.6] doesn't work with 32 bit

Bug#583849: Why wontfix?

2010-09-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 16:19 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: Hi, I noticed that you tagged bug 583849 as wontfix, but you didn't post any explanation of that tag to the bug. Mind elaborating on the reason for the wontfix? The purpose of these meta packages is to ensure users will automatically

Bug#585864: I get a similar bug

2010-09-01 Thread maximilian attems
hello Kir, hello Pavel, see http://bugs.debian.org/585864 On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Dietmar Maurer wrote: Hi all, I get a similar bug when I enable KSM: http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 when I disable KSM everything work without problems. (beside the slow fsync rate when

Bug#583849: Why wontfix?

2010-09-01 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:51:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 16:19 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: I noticed that you tagged bug 583849 as wontfix, but you didn't post any explanation of that tag to the bug. Mind elaborating on the reason for the wontfix? The

Jusqu'a -30 pourcent pour la rentrée !

2010-09-01 Thread Les 3Suisses par Actu-shop
Actu-shop vous propose de tirer avantage des nouveautés de son partenaire Les 3suisses. -- Bonjour, c'est la rentrée avec les 3suisses et c'est le moment de faire les derniers préparatifs ! Les 3suisses vous