Bug#534579: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: oopses in usbhid when cable is loose

tags 534579 -moreinfo reassign 534579 linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 thanks On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:45:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based > on 2.6.32. Please test the current 2.6.32 from unstable/testing and tell > us whe

Bug#534579: more info on linux-image oopses in usbhid when cable is loose

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:33:23AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > It seems that somehow the USB is getting reinitialized > (the strange fact is that I never get a message like > "Communications lost" ) here is the message that appears in kernel log [59406.479414] usb 3-2: USB disconnect, address 4 [59

Bug#534579: more info on linux-image oopses in usbhid when cable is loose

hi, some more info, when I start the apcupsd daemon (and it does not crash) then the daemon, ~ every 2 minutes, sends me an email claiming that "Communications restored with UPS " It seems that somehow the USB is getting reinitialized (the strange fact is that I never get a message like "Commu

Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: oopses in usbhid when cable is loose

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 534579 -moreinfo Bug #534579 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: oopses in usbhid when cable is loose Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > reassign 534579 linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 Bug #534579 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: oopses

Processed: tagging 598503

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 598503 + patch Bug #598503 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: FTBFS: (powerpc) drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_nx.c:716: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq' Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#598503: [PATCH] qla4xxx: Fix build on some architectures lacking 64-bit I/O

readq() and writeq() are not defined on all archictectures. Where they are missing, define fallback implementations (copied from qla2xxx). Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/598503 Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- This is a regression from 2.6.35, so please include this fix in 2.6.36. Ben. dri

Processed: bug 598144 is forwarded to linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 598144 linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org Bug #598144 [linux-2.6] rt2500pci: very low transfers and link quality Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#598144: rt2500pci: very low transfers and link quality

On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:52 +0200, David Sanchez Herrero wrote: > Hi again, > > After some troubles that I could solve, I connected the interface, but > it's impossible to make anything because in all terminals appears one > message continously: > > cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulato

Bug#598323: linux-image-2.6.35.6: Servers reboot on heavy load on DRBD+OCFS2 partition

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 19:10 +0400, Proskurin Kirill wrote: [...] > Summary: > > Kernel: 2.6.36-rc5 SMP x86_64 (from experimental) > DRBD-utils-8.3.8(from experimental) > OCFS2-1.4.4-3(from testing) ocfs2 is already included in the kernel package and you should use that. > iozone3-308-1(from test

Processed: tagging 598648

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 598648 + pending Bug #598648 [linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64] linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64: typo in package description Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping pro

Bug#598648: linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64: typo in package description

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 20:57 +0200, Davide Prina wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64 > Severity: minor > > In DDTSS I see: > > Linux 2.6 for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), Xen dom0 support, Xen dom0 support > > I think it must be: > > Linux 2.6 for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), Xen dom0 support

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:28:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 21:09:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Okay it seems it still happens with .36 so let's say it's an X bug then. > > It's a separate issue from what you reported initially, and it doesn't > even sound l

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 21:09:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Okay it seems it still happens with .36 so let's say it's an X bug then. It's a separate issue from what you reported initially, and it doesn't even sound like a bug. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 598492 2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1 Bug #598492 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.36~rc5-1~experimen

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

fixed 598492 2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1 thanks > > > > > In addition to that, for some reason, when I come back from suspend, > > > > > my > > > > > keyboard mapping in X is lost, which doesn't happen if I boot a .32 > > > > > kernel. > > > > Which sort of keyboard mapping? Which Xorg? > > > set

Bug#598648: linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64: typo in package description

Package: linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64 Severity: minor In DDTSS I see: Linux 2.6 for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), Xen dom0 support, Xen dom0 support I think it must be: Linux 2.6 for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), Xen dom0 support, Xen domU support

Bug#598644: linux-2.6: README.Debian gets installed in the wrong package

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-24 Severity: minor README.Debian gets installed in linux-tools-2.6.32. It would probably be better to have it in linux-base. Cheers, Julien -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testin

Processed: reassign 510471 to linux-2.6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 510471 linux-2.6 Bug #510471 [linux2.6] sata hd freezes with heavy load Warning: Unknown package 'linux2.6' Bug reassigned from package 'linux2.6' to 'linux-2.6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#598633: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max defaults to 200000 without apparent reason

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 05:14:44PM +0100, Tim Small wrote: > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max defaults to 20 - unnecessarily > limiting software RAID performance, I can't see a reason for this limit > which seems a bit arbitrary Please explain. This limits the bandwidth allocated for for

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #595927 (http://bugs.debian.org/595927) # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi

Processed: fixed 598492 in 2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1, notfixed 598492 in 2.6.36~rc5.1~experimental.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 598492 2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1 Bug #598492 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.36~rc5-1~experimen

Bug#598492: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:45:22 +0100 with message-id <20100930164522.gl13...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up has caused the Debian Bug report #598492, regarding linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: su

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:22:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:40:07AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > - kernel errors (for hibernation), though for some reason this wasn't > > > > logged to

Bug#598633: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max defaults to 200000 without apparent reason

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-23 Severity: normal /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max defaults to 20 - unnecessarily limiting software RAID performance, I can't see a reason for this limit which seems a bit arbitrary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.or

Re: Missing headers in linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-common

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:34:55 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: > Excuse my ignorance, but I still couldn't understand why there doesn't > exist a bug report page for linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-common. Isn't it > officially supported by the Debian GNU/Linux? If so, why is it located > in the official

Re: Missing headers in linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-common

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Ben Hutchings writes: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:26:13PM +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: > This is a bug in the ALSA configure script > which is fixed in the Debian package of alsa-driver. Excuse my ignorance, but I still couldn't understand why

Re: Missing headers in linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-common

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:26:13PM +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: > Hi, > > While trying to compile latest alsa-driver from sources, during "make" > it complains that [...] This is a bug in the ALSA configure script which is fixed in the Debian package of alsa-driver.

Bug#597952: Initramfs.tools fail yet again

--- On Thu, 9/30/10, maximilian attems wrote: From: maximilian attems Subject: Re: Bug#597952: Initramfs.tools fail yet again To: "George Stuart" Cc: 597...@bugs.debian.org Date: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 6:25 AM Please "reply to all", so that the bug report also gets your mail, thanks.

Missing headers in linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-common

Hi, While trying to compile latest alsa-driver from sources, during "make" it complains that make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-common' ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid. include/linux/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf are missing. Run

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:40:07AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Severity: grave > > You should know better. > really, each time I close the lid of my computer it crashes losing all > my session data, so yeah, I think it's grave

Bug#598543: marked as done (various firmware and initrd.img woes)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:27:10 + with message-id <20100930102710.gs5...@vostochny.stro.at> and subject line Re: Bug#598543: various firmware and initrd.img woes has caused the Debian Bug report #598543, regarding various firmware and initrd.img woes to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#597952: Initramfs.tools fail yet again

Please "reply to all", so that the bug report also gets your mail, thanks. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:08:46AM -0700, George Stuart wrote: > > > Out put from ls -l /var/lib/initramfs-tools > > r...@debian:/home/chevy# ls -l /var/lib/initramfs-tools > total 12 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 81 Sep 24 1

Bug#597952: Initramfs.tools fail yet again

--- On Tue, 9/28/10, maximilian attems wrote: From: maximilian attems Subject: Re: Bug#597952: Initramfs.tools fail yet again To: "George Stuart" , 597...@bugs.debian.org Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:24 AM On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:14:55AM -0700, George Stuart wrote: > Processing tr

Bug#589403: Update

So I plugged the phone onto another computer that's running Debian testing as well, and this time, it worked, and the phone was correctly recognized as iface usb0. Networkmanager caught up and brought the connection up just fine. That's very confusing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-

Re: Uploading linux-2.6

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 16:57:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 (2.6.32-24) on Tuesday night > or Wednesday morning. This will include stable update 2.6.32.23 which has > a number of security fixes, therefore urgency will be 'high'. > Unblocked. Chee

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:40:07AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > severity 598492 important > > thanks > > > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 > > > > There

Bug#598515: Error persists

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Have I done somethong wrong? The building process cannot proceed after this failure. Regards Dimitris Στις Πέμπτη 30 Σεπτέμβριος 2010 00:12:58 γράψατε: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:33:41AM +0300, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos wrote: > > bzip2: (stdin) is not a

Bug#598492: linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is totally fucked up

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > severity 598492 important > thanks > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 > > There is a 2.6.36-rc5 based version in experimental now. Does it show > similar symptom