Bug#603254: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-686-bigmem: please enable CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG

2010-11-12 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.36 Hi, the CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG is currently not enabled in Debian kernels: $ grep CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG /boot/config-2.6.36-trunk-686-bigmem # CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG is not set Without this option powertop complains with this message: Suggestion:

Bug#602956: only on armel

2010-11-12 Thread Frank Denissen
I have just tried to export the root nfs4 directory on a i386 architecture and there /exports is exported on a ext4 filesystem without problems. So I assume the problem only occurs on an armel architecture (sheevaplug). Note: others have identical problems:

Re: [Debian] Re: [...@stro.at: Debian linux-2.6 Paris meeting]

2010-11-12 Thread maximilian attems
Hello Kir, I am on list and happy to discuss anything on list. adding d-kernel on CC to, so that everyone is informed. Please Ola, don't send private mails for things that are not private. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Quoting Kir Kolyshkin k...@openvz.org:

Re: [Debian] Re: [...@stro.at: Debian linux-2.6 Paris meeting]

2010-11-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: My intention was to get a clarification of whether this announcement was for the future or if it was for the nearest time. not sure how it can be confounded with near future? the topitem explicitly lists Wheezy as time frame.

Re: [Debian] Re: [m...@stro.at: Debian linux-2.6 Paris meeting]

2010-11-12 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Maximilian Just wanted to explain why I asked you privately, and that was to check the intention of this without starting another flamewar. :-) Obviously I started a small flame by my intention to not start a big one ;-) Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at: Hello Kir, I am on list

Bug#603158: [fwd] Re: [oss-security] CVE request: kernel: possible kernel oops from user MSS

2010-11-12 Thread Julien Cristau
retitle 603158 CVE-2010-4165: possible kernel oops from user MSS kthxbye fyi, CVE assigned Cheers, Julien - Forwarded message from Josh Bressers bress...@redhat.com - From: Josh Bressers bress...@redhat.com Reply-To: oss-secur...@lists.openwall.com Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:19:57 -0500

Processed: [fwd] Re: [oss-security] CVE request: kernel: possible kernel oops from user MSS

2010-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 603158 CVE-2010-4165: possible kernel oops from user MSS Bug #603158 [linux-2.6] possible kernel oops from user MSS Changed Bug title to 'CVE-2010-4165: possible kernel oops from user MSS' from 'possible kernel oops from user MSS'

Re: [Debian] Re: [...@stro.at: Debian linux-2.6 Paris meeting]

2010-11-12 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Maximilian. Thanks. You have answered my question. Now Kir and I just have to build good arguments why we should have openvz back. :-) Best regards, // Ola Quoting maximilian attems m...@stro.at: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: My intention was to get

Bug#603301: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: FS-Cache doesn't working with my NFS mount

2010-11-12 Thread Piotr Meyer
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-27 Severity: normal Tags: upstream patch Adter enabling FS-Cache on my NFS mount (busy WWW node) I got following error (more in dmesg below): CacheFiles: I/O Error: Unlink failed FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error I found thread about exact