Package: linux-image-686
Version: My Intel 82801H sound card is not working in Squeeze for
linux-image-2.6.32-5-486 and linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Severity: normal
Dear Developers,
My notebook have the following sound card:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Hi,
I just did a fresh install of Squeeze (using the Beta1 d-i, amd64). I
encountered this bug using 2.6.32-27, although the bug was allegedly
fixed in 2.6.32-25.
My machine has exactly 4 GB of RAM and an AMD 64 X2 5200+ CPU.
Additional details follow.
Thanks,
Neal
Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22:46PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
our company is developing multi port serial cards among other
products. The main problem is, when the customers first install this
devices especially
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 04:09:24PM +0100, lauren wrote:
i'm sorry but i don't know how to do that kind of upgrade ... will it
break the rest of my system? :(
No, it won't. Just do the following:
# cat /etc/apt/preferences EOF
Package: *
Pin: release
2010/11/15 Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de:
Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22:46PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
our company is developing multi port serial cards among other
products. The main problem
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
However, the same applies to several other package names that change
with the upstream version number: linux-source-version,
linux-doc-version, linux-manual-version and
linux-patch-debian-version. I think perhaps we should remove those
with
hi and thanks so much for trying to help
i tried what you said but got:
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of
Hello,
can you please stop top-posting? (See e.g.
http://idallen.com/topposting.html for some reasoning.)
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:18:00PM +0100, lauren wrote:
hi and thanks so much for trying to help
i tried what you said but got:
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22:46PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
our company is developing multi port serial cards among other
products. The main
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut VARÈNE vare...@debian.org wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
Version: 2.6.32-20
Severity: grave
Justification: renders system unusable
System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9.
Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:32:43 +
with message-id 1289824363.2816.181.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#603508: kernel crashes during raid6 resync
has caused the Debian Bug report #603508,
regarding kernel crashes during raid6 resync
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut VARÈNE vare...@debian.org wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
Version: 2.6.32-20
Severity: grave
Justification: renders system unusable
System boots fine with
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.36-1~experimental.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
Hi there,
when I start powertop, after a while I get this message:
Suggestion: Enable the CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG kernel configuration option.
This option will allow PowerTOP to collect runtime power
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote:
As expected, 2.6.36.1 from experimental fucked up my raid
gracefully, just as 2.6.35-21 did. I'm so very very happy right now,
I obviously meant 2.6.32-21 here.
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/
2010/10/20 Thomas DEBESSE thomas.debesse+deb...@gmail.com:
I've just installed a fresh Squeeze and I got the new kernel :
I have the 2.6.32-25, wich was announced to solve the problem,
and yes this new one put modules.order in initramfs
but the wrong module is always loaded :
This bug is not
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut VARÈNE vare...@debian.org
wrote:
Package:
Anything new here?
I think upstream changed the default, but I'm not sure in what version.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #602966 (http://bugs.debian.org/602966)
# *
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:40:27PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut VARÈNE vare...@debian.org wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
Version: 2.6.32-20
Severity: grave
Justification:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:35:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37
Dear kernel team,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
I'm sorry, I won't have the time to do new benchmarks on this.
The only benchmarks we have have been made by Sven Joachim:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578635#20
(asyncsync is the switch
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:28 PM, dann frazier da...@dannf.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:35:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Given that this bug still exists in 2.6.36, you can report a bug upstream at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org. We will be happy to backport any fix if
possible.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
forcemerge 603563 603254
Bug#603563: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-686-bigmem: Enable the
CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG option
Bug#603254: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-686-bigmem:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:32:08PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:28 PM, dann frazier da...@dannf.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:35:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Given that this bug still exists in 2.6.36, you can report a bug upstream
at
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Since there are many known security flaws in -9, you should only do this if
you have a properly configured local firewall and are prepared to treat all
local users as having root access.
Not a concern: no local users
On 11/15/2010 02:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 18:30 +0100, fbugs wrote:
[...]
#cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
1199000
#echo 253 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
#cat
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: important
I just tried d-i 6beta1 and booted Squeeeze and its 2.6.32 kernel for
the first time on my usual server hardware (Dell R410).
I opted for the xen-amd64 kernel, and it boots fine on bare metal. But
as soon as I tried
Booting command-list
root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
kernel /boot/xen-4.0-amd64.gz com2=57600,8n1,0x2f8,3 console=com2 dom0_mem=102
4M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all sync_console console_to_ring lapic=debug apic_ve
rbosity=debug apic=debug iommu=off
[Multiboot-elf,
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 23:35 +0100, Florian wrote:
[...]
Ok. Before I go to kernel.org's bugzilla: I have found out with the help
of snapshot.debian.org that the last working debian kernel version was
2.6.32-20:
Oh, good thinking.
---
cpufreq-info | grep hardware limits\|current policy
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Current Linux-2.6 package does not work bluetooth controller of
MacbookPro 6,2 and 7,1.
Because Device Class of these controllers was set 255 (Vendor Sepecific Class).
I attach a patch revising this problem.
These patches
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 12:27 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Current Linux-2.6 package does not work bluetooth controller of
MacbookPro 6,2 and 7,1.
Because Device Class of these controllers was set 255 (Vendor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 603651 + pending
Bug #603651 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support Bluetooth
controller of MacbookPro 6,2 and 7,1
Added tag(s) pending.
End of
Hi
2010/11/16 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 12:27 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Current Linux-2.6 package does not work bluetooth controller of
MacbookPro 6,2 and 7,1.
Because Device
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 16:18 -0800, Adriano Vilela Barbosa wrote:
[...]
I have the exact same problem. Resuming from suspend on my laptop works fine
under the 2.6.32 series, but I get a full restart (most of the time,
34 matches
Mail list logo
