Hi,
On 12/22/2010 10:34 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I was wondering about clamping something in the kernel to correspond to
CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY and avoid the issue but you say the crash
is after x VCPUS and before Scrubbing Free RAM so I'm surprised the
dom0 kernel has run at this point
On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:24:28 Nicolas Limare wrote:
I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
What is Bug#587014? Do you have a link?
Panasonic is the only driver which will always try to use
native
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:40:03AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:24:28 Nicolas Limare wrote:
I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
What is Bug#587014? Do you have a
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:02:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...' does
not make it clear that this is a fatal error for the watchdog. It
also currently prints the error value as a pointer, rather than
extracting the error code with
Hi,
This is presumably caused by a bug in rtl8187. However, it is not a
general protection fault so there may be two different bugs here.
Yes, the GPF is around sec 30. After that bug, I blacklisted rtl8187,
and resulted in the other GPFs at boot time that are not logged.
Can you try
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I have put some test packages with the patches discussed further up the
bug (less the pte_flags one as mentioned) at:
http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/2.6.32-29+xen0/
Please could you test and let me know how you get on. In
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 2.6.32+28
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
After cold boot without power cable plugged in
/sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online is 1 which
leaves on_ac_power returning wrong information for packages like
laptop-mode-tools.
Hardware used is Lenovo ThinkPad
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:05:32AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:30 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Please can you test whether aesni-intel loads and works in:
1. Package version 2.6.32-12
I have the same problem when trying to install with
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
armel/current/images/kirkwood/netboot/marvell/sheevaplug/uImage
and
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 19:36 +0200, Mikko Tuumanen wrote:
I have the same problem when trying to install with
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
armel/current/images/kirkwood/netboot/marvell/sheevaplug/uImage
and
Those are the installer kernel and initrd, which are an older version
than the kernel and modules that get installed in the filesystem. You
I want to install to a usb stick and I can't because sd_mod doesn't load.
# modprobe sd_mod
FATAL: Error inserting sd_mod (/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 608538 + d-i
Bug #608538 [btrfs-tools] Didn't include required module in initramfs
Bug #602254 [btrfs-tools] Didn't include required module in initramfs
Added tag(s) d-i.
Added tag(s) d-i.
reassign 608538 initramfs-tools
Bug #608538
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:19 +0100, Andrea Spadaccini wrote:
Hi,
This is presumably caused by a bug in rtl8187. However, it is not a
general protection fault so there may be two different bugs here.
Yes, the GPF is around sec 30. After that bug, I blacklisted rtl8187,
and resulted in
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 17:04 +0100, Martin Kraus wrote:
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 2.6.32+28
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
After cold boot without power cable plugged in
/sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online is 1 which
leaves on_ac_power returning wrong information for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 608804 + moreinfo
Bug #608804 [linux-2.6] linux-image-amd64: /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online
is 1 without power cable plugged in
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems.
This is easily reproducible, I installed from a recent daily build
netinst, put /boot on ext3 and / on btrfs and same problem on boot.
The problem is that btrfs depends on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 608138 + pending
Bug #608138 [linux-2.6] Annoying warning NMI watchdog failed to create perf
event on cpu0
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems.
This is easily reproducible, I installed from a recent daily build
netinst, put /boot on ext3 and / on btrfs and
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM +]:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems.
This is easily reproducible, I
* Mikko Tuumanen mikko.tuuma...@utu.fi [2011-01-03 20:57]:
Should this bug report then be filed against the installer?
A new version of the installer is currently in preparation. When a
new version is in preparation, the old version of the netboot images
are broken since the kernel and modules
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM +]:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
issue in getting Debian to support
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +]:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM
+]:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
So, at least a
No, there is no. Only the /sys/class/backlight/panasonic/ directory is present.
Cristopher
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Is there a /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 directory as well as the
Panasonic one?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
Is there a /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 directory as well as the
Panasonic one?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:14:40AM +0800, Cristopher Camacho wrote:
No, there is no. Only the /sys/class/backlight/panasonic/ directory is
present.
Can you attach the output of the acpidump command on your system?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Well, that's odd. There's certainly support for ACPI backlight control
in your firmware, and it goes via opregion so it should work correctly.
I think the thing to do here is to have the panasonic driver bail if
there's ACPI backlight support, and then figure out why the ACPI video
driver
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:57 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +]:
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM
+]:
On Mon,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 564628 + pending
Bug #564628 [src:firmware-nonfree] Add Realtek RTL8168D firmware
Bug #587960 [src:firmware-nonfree] [Debian] Where can I find rtl81638d-2.fw
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 602450 + pending
Bug #602450 [firmware-nonfree] firmware-nonfree: Please add
rtlwifi/rtl8712u.bin, needed by r8712u = 2.6.37, to firmware-realtek
Added tag(s)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 598470 + pending
Bug #598470 [firmware-bnx2] bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in
firmware-bnx2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #598470 to the same
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:50:53 +
with message-id 1294105853.3167.257.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: firmware-linux: please include ihex2fw tool into one of
linux-* packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #603775,
regarding firmware-linux: please include ihex2fw tool into
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 598470 + pending
Bug #598470 [firmware-bnx2] bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in
firmware-bnx2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #598470 to the same
On 01/03/2011 03:32 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Try this. I've made it reasonably generic so you can easily add other
hidden dependencies like tg3 - broadcom.
Ben.
I wrote a couple of macros for Karmic to solve a race problem that might
be applicable here. I think there are several areas of
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 19:31 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:32 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Try this. I've made it reasonably generic so you can easily add other
hidden dependencies like tg3 - broadcom.
Ben.
I wrote a couple of macros for Karmic to solve a race problem
firmware-nonfree_0.28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.28.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.28.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.28_all.deb
firmware-atheros_0.28_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.28_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.28_all.deb
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29~bpo50+1
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1)
(norb...@tretkowski.de) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) ) #1 SMP Wed Dec
1 21:46:07 UTC 2010
** Command line:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 15:55 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Ok. And am I correct in assuming that if the ABI change would
break an OOT module, you would normally change the ABI number?
In the time I've been involved in the kernel team, I haven't yet
Can you reproduce this without VMware modules loaded?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package firmware-nonfree. This includes several
important fixes for network hardware:
- Added firmware patches for some Realtek network controllers that
allow them to
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.7
Severity: normal
Installing initramfs-tools version 0.98.7 on squeeze (=debian testing) I get
the following error messages:
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 296:
/tmp/mkinitramfs_6qmV4K/scripts/init-top/all_generic_ide: Permission denied
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs:
40 matches
Mail list logo
