Bug#578912: [squeeze] [R520] soft lockups with radeon KMS

2012-02-14 Thread Zsolt Rizsanyi
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: I still have the system, but I have upgraded it to a testing/unstable mix and I'm currently running the 3.2 kernel. I'm not sure if it would be reasonable to test with 2.6.32

Bug#578912: [squeeze] [R520] soft lockups with radeon KMS

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: Unfortunately it turns out that the radeon drivers from wheezy could not initialize with 2.6.32-21. X froze taking with it the display. The underlying system was functional. Perfect, thanks for checking. (That's not unfortunate at all --- it means you're able to

Bug#578912: [squeeze] [R520] soft lockups with radeon KMS

2012-02-14 Thread Zsolt Rizsanyi
Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: Unfortunately it turns out that the radeon drivers from wheezy could not initialize with 2.6.32-21. X froze taking with it the display. The underlying system was functional.

Bug#638863: Errors/warnings show during startup

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Ralf, Ralf Jung wrote[1]: after upgrading to version 3.2.0-1 of the kernel, one of the two error messages during startup is gone - the corresponding patch by Bjorn Helgaas has been accepted upstream. However, the timer error is still present: $ dmesg | fgrep TCO [ 11.915459]

Bug#578912: [squeeze] [R520] soft lockups with radeon KMS

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Perfect, thanks for checking.  (That's not unfortunate at all --- it means you're able to reproduce the bug.)  How about 2.6.32-41? Not really. You have probably misunderstood. The original

Bug#578912: [squeeze] [R520] soft lockups with radeon KMS

2012-02-14 Thread Zsolt Rizsanyi
Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: Not really. You have probably misunderstood. The original problem was that X started and occasionally froze for shorter or longer periods. You are right --- I was hoping the two

Processed: Re: Bug#659866: Errors regarding builtin modules when updating initramfs

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 659866 initramfs-tools Bug #659866 [kmod] Errors regarding builtin modules when updating initramfs Bug reassigned from package 'kmod' to 'initramfs-tools'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions kmod/5-1. thanks Stopping processing

Re: Bug#659866: Errors regarding builtin modules when updating initramfs

2012-02-14 Thread Marco d'Itri
reassign 659866 initramfs-tools thanks On Feb 14, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: WARNING: could not open /tmp/mkinitramfs_PEoSkD/lib/modules/3.2.0-1-amd64/modules.builtin: No such file or directory This is a kernel bug, our kernel packages must start distributing this file. I stand

Bug#659866: Errors regarding builtin modules when updating initramfs

2012-02-14 Thread Michael Biebl
On 14.02.2012 12:47, Marco d'Itri wrote: reassign 659866 initramfs-tools thanks On Feb 14, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: WARNING: could not open /tmp/mkinitramfs_PEoSkD/lib/modules/3.2.0-1-amd64/modules.builtin: No such file or directory This is a kernel bug, our kernel packages

Processing of initramfs-tools_0.100_amd64.changes

2012-02-14 Thread Debian FTP Masters
initramfs-tools_0.100_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initramfs-tools_0.100.dsc initramfs-tools_0.100.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.100_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

initramfs-tools 0.100 release

2012-02-14 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi, we just released initramfs-tools v0.100, with a bunch of bugfixes. The shortlog at the end of this mail has the details, find the git stuff at the usual place: * Git repository: git://git.debian.org/kernel/initramfs-tools.git * Git web:

Bug#454665: marked as done (initramfs-tools: busybox depends should include busybox-static)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#454665: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #454665, regarding initramfs-tools: busybox depends should include busybox-static to be marked as

Bug#566401: marked as done (Does not install firmware.agent into initramfs)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004ro...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#566401: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #566401, regarding Does not install firmware.agent into initramfs to be marked as done. This means

Bug#586381: marked as done (initramfs-tools: lsinitramfs fails with non-gzipped initramfs images)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#586381: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #586381, regarding initramfs-tools: lsinitramfs fails with non-gzipped initramfs images to be marked

Bug#633078: marked as done (initramfs-tools: lsinitramfs doesn't understand xy-compression)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#586381: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #586381, regarding initramfs-tools: lsinitramfs doesn't understand xy-compression to be marked as

Bug#589963: marked as done (preinst fails if awk is unpacked but not configured)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004ru...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#589963: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #589963, regarding preinst fails if awk is unpacked but not configured to be marked as done. This

Bug#601319: marked as done (initramfs-tools: existing hook script foo~ causes all hook scripts to be ignored)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rx...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#601319: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #601319, regarding initramfs-tools: existing hook script foo~ causes all hook scripts to be ignored

Bug#607888: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Generated initrds missing critical modules)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004ra...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#607888: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #607888, regarding initramfs-tools: Generated initrds missing critical modules to be marked as done.

Bug#610462: marked as done (mkinitramfs fails when RCS dir exists in /etc)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#610462: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #610462, regarding mkinitramfs fails when RCS dir exists in /etc to be marked as done. This means

Bug#615831: marked as done (initramfs-tools: USB keyboards are not available at break=top shell)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615831: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #615831, regarding initramfs-tools: USB keyboards are not available at break=top shell to be marked as

Bug#616581: marked as done (initramfs-tools: USB keyboard not available with init=/bin/sh)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615831: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #615831, regarding initramfs-tools: USB keyboard not available with init=/bin/sh to be marked as done.

Bug#624702: marked as done (initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs doesn't honor setting of BOOTDIR when searching for config-... files)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#624702: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #624702, regarding initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs doesn't honor setting of BOOTDIR when searching for

Bug#628374: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Recent changes to hooks break busybox in initrd)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#628374: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #628374, regarding initramfs-tools: Recent changes to hooks break busybox in initrd to be marked as

Bug#635631: marked as done (cryptsetup: Files not found in initrd image)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004rm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#628374: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #628374, regarding cryptsetup: Files not found in initrd image to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#636495: marked as done (initramfs-tools: installs optimized libraries into the initramfs)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004ry...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#636495: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #636495, regarding initramfs-tools: installs optimized libraries into the initramfs to be marked as

Bug#639902: marked as done (Alternate Recommends on busybox-static)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:33 + with message-id e1rxjgh-0004s3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#639902: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #639902, regarding Alternate Recommends on busybox-static to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#649399: marked as done (initramfs-tools: please mark Multi-Arch: foreign)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:48:34 + with message-id e1rxjgi-0004s8...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649399: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.100 has caused the Debian Bug report #649399, regarding initramfs-tools: please mark Multi-Arch: foreign to be marked as done. This means

initramfs-tools_0.100_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-02-14 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: initramfs-tools_0.100.dsc to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.100.dsc initramfs-tools_0.100.tar.gz to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.100.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.100_all.deb to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.100_all.deb Override entries for your

Bug#655724: linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64: the system described below is unstable with this kernel with selected processes hanging indefinitely

2012-02-14 Thread fulvio ciriaco
Hallo Ben, I managed to build an identical machine, which worked without any fault. So I tested the memories again for one week, and indeed they were faulty, though they faulted extremely seldom. Please close the bug and excuse me for the noise Fulvio From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk

Bug#655724: marked as done (linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64: the system described below is unstable with this kernel with selected processes hanging indefinitely)

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 + with message-id 1329234823.3048.68.camel@deadeye and subject line Re: Bug#655724: linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64: the system described below is unstable with this kernel with selected processes hanging indefinitely has caused the Debian Bug report

Bug#638863: Errors/warnings show during startup

2012-02-14 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ralf, Ralf Jung wrote[1]: after upgrading to version 3.2.0-1 of the kernel, one of the two error messages during startup is gone - the corresponding patch by Bjorn Helgaas has been accepted upstream. However,

Bug#656196: Stalls happen with 3.0

2012-02-14 Thread Michael Below
The stall happens with 3.0.0-1-amd64 while it didn't happen with 2.6.39. Anything else I can try? Feb 14 18:28:15 ossietzky rtkit-daemon[2292]: The canary thread is apparently starving. Taking action. Feb 14 18:28:15 ossietzky rtkit-daemon[2292]: Demoting known real-time threads. Feb 14 18:28:15

Bug#659461: Solved, bug can be closed

2012-02-14 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Dear maintainer-team, the new kernel module added two new regulators speakers and headphones, and they are both set to 0 by default! Additionally kmix and some other GUI might not show them as well as alsamixer, but just start alsamixer -c0 and all sliders appear. Now you can set them as you

Bug#638863: Errors/warnings show during startup

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1184383 If I understand correctly, Cyrill Gorcunov liked the patches. Bjorn, would you like to resend, or should I? I don't think we had clear

Bug#656196: Stalls happen with 3.0

2012-02-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:35:36PM +0100, Michael Below wrote: The stall happens with 3.0.0-1-amd64 while it didn't happen with 2.6.39. Anything else I can try? [...] What about the current version, Linux 3.2? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit

Processed: Re: [3.1.8 - 3.2.4 regression] Acer Aspire 7520G: no sound

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 659461 linux-2.6/3.2.4-1 Bug #659461 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 - no sound after update to this kernel Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.4-1. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

how to rebuild linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64

2012-02-14 Thread Roberto Majadas Lopez
Hello debian hackers : I need to rebuild linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 package. I need to disable some modules and make some changes, but i can't find info about how can i rebuild this kind of packages. Which is the standard way to rebuild this kind of packages? Thanks for all

Re: how to rebuild linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64

2012-02-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:27:49PM +0100, Roberto Majadas Lopez wrote: Hello debian hackers : I need to rebuild linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 package. I need to disable some modules and make some changes, but i can't find info about how can i rebuild this kind of packages. Which is the standard

Bug#659461: [3.1.8 - 3.2.4 regression] Acer Aspire 7520G: no sound

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: So my first target is mostly google and/or the debian-user list Sure, that helps. I'll try to come up with something for the alsa-base README.Debian which can be easily google-able. And of course, thanks for writing, and I look forward to reports of any future

Re: how to rebuild linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64

2012-02-14 Thread Roberto Majadas Lopez
2012/2/14 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:27:49PM +0100, Roberto Majadas Lopez wrote: Hello debian hackers : I need to rebuild linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 package. I need to disable some modules and make some changes, but i can't find info about how can i

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-02-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point release would be due in early February. As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for lenny will end on February 6th (a year after the

Bug#659521: [3.1 - 3.2.4 regression] ath9k: no packets are transmitted or received with WEP

2012-02-14 Thread stefan schippers
Hello, Jonathan i did all the steps you asked: Booting the laptop with the 3.2.6 kernel built from the git cloned tree shows the exact same problem: no network traffic over the wireless connection (ath9k module). applying the patch, rebuilding the kernel and running the laptop with this new

Bug#659521: [3.1 - 3.2.4 regression] ath9k: no packets are transmitted or received with WEP

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
clone 659521 -1 submitter 659521 stefan schippers stefan.schipp...@gmail.com retitle 659521 [3.1 - 3.2.2 regression] ath9k: no packets are transmitted or received with WEP tags 659521 + upstream patch quit stefan schippers wrote: i did all the steps you asked: Booting the laptop with the

Processed: Re: [3.1 - 3.2.4 regression] ath9k: no packets are transmitted or received with WEP

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 659521 -1 Bug#659521: ath9k: ATH9K driver will not connect to my adhoc network but works with managed (router) connections Bug 659521 cloned as bug 659927. submitter 659521 stefan schippers stefan.schipp...@gmail.com Bug #659521

Bug#659927: [3.1.8 - 3.2.4 regression] ATH9K driver will not connect to my adhoc network

2012-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 659927 + patch moreinfo quit Hi, Ankman wrote: as this is my first bug report ever I'm not sure if I understand. Sorry for the roller coaster ride. If I understand correctly, your ad hoc network uses WEP. That's very good news, since it means there's a better patch to try. See [*] for

Processed: Re: [3.1.8 - 3.2.4 regression] ATH9K driver will not connect to my adhoc network

2012-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 659927 + patch moreinfo Bug #659927 [src:linux-2.6] ath9k: ATH9K driver will not connect to my adhoc network but works with managed (router) connections Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Re: How to tell users that ia32-libs will go away

2012-02-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at