Bug#600286: atl1c driver hangs after NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out

2012-04-13 Thread Pavel Vorob`ev
see end of message http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600286#32


Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:31:18 -0500 от Richard Nelson unix...@gmail.com:
 Greetings,
 
 I found this thread  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/24/365  with a patch
 of  https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2012/2/24/365/1  perhaps it assists
 some how on this issue.
 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/CA+p-VY-A-zVFL8-LODUdhRyLN95D=bbteqberb4qnlu6x5g...@mail.gmail.com
 
 

Bug#668616: initramfs-tools: for root /boot/rootfs missing /boot/rootfs /sys/block/ entry

2012-04-13 Thread Vincent Danjean
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.101
Severity: important
Tags: patch

  Hi,

  Since my last upgrade on a squeeze with parts of wheezy, update-initramfs
fails to create the initrd.img file with the following error message:

mkinitramfs: for root /boot/rootfs missing /boot/rootfs /sys/block/ entry
mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most
mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug

The machine is a kvm virtual machine with few space on /boot so the
suggested workaround is not an option for me.


  During my last upgrade, initramfs-tools was *not* upgraded. So I tried
to see in details where the problem really come from.

Looking into /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions, I see:
=
# find and only copy root relevant modules
dep_add_modules()
{
[...]
# findout root block device + fstype
eval $( mount | while read dev foo mp foo fs opts rest ; do \
[ $mp = / ]  printf root=$dev\nFSTYPE=$fs \
 break; done)

# On failure fallback to /proc/mounts if readable
if [ -z $root ]  [ -r /proc/mounts ]; then
eval $(while read dev mp fs opts rest ; do \
[ $mp = / ]  [ $fs != rootfs ] \
 printf root=$dev\nFSTYPE=$fs\
 break; done  /proc/mounts)
fi
[...]
root=$(readlink -f ${root})
[...]
# Error out if /sys lack block dev
if [ -z ${block} ] || [ ! -e /sys/block/${block} ]; then
echo mkinitramfs: for root ${root} missing ${block} 
/sys/block/ entry 2
echo mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most 2
echo mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug 2
exit 1
fi
[...]
}


Note how the output of the 'mount' command is handled differently from
the contents of '/proc/mounts': there is no test '  [ $fs != rootfs ]'
in the first case.

And if root=rootfs, then 'root=$(readlink -f ${root})' set root to 
/boot/rootfs
as rootfs does not exist and the script is run from the boot directory.

kooot:/boot# mount
rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
[...]
kooot:/boot# readlink -f rootfs
/boot/rootfs
kooot:/boot# 

During my upgrade, sysvinit-utils and initscripts have been upgraded from
2.88dsf-13.1 to 2.88dsf-22.1. I think (I did not check) that this move
/etc/mtab into a symlink to /proc/mounts. So, the result of mount
should be handled the same as the contents of /proc/mounts.
And indeed, adding   [ $fs != rootfs ] when handling the
output of mount fixed the problem for me.

  Regards,
Vincent

-- Package-specific info:
-- initramfs sizes
-- /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.3.0-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/mapper/eyak-root ro quiet

-- resume
RESUME=UUID=c595b643-7575-4004-9fe8-a8ed8939488f
-- /proc/filesystems
ext4
ext3
fuseblk
vfat
udf
iso9660
hfsplus
hfs
ext2
reiserfs
xfs
jfs
omfs

-- lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
tun18340  2 
nls_iso8859_1  12461  0 
omfs   18216  0 
jfs   137479  0 
xfs   590971  0 
reiserfs  192397  0 
ext2   59252  0 
hfs45882  0 
hfsplus71608  0 
isofs  35185  0 
udf68066  0 
crc_itu_t  12347  2 udf,omfs
nls_utf8   12456  0 
nls_cp437  16553  0 
vfat   17315  0 
fat45701  1 vfat
aesni_intel50708  0 
cryptd 14517  1 aesni_intel
aes_x86_64 16796  1 aesni_intel
aes_generic33026  2 aes_x86_64,aesni_intel
ip6table_filter12540  0 
ip6_tables 22175  1 ip6table_filter
iptable_filter 12536  0 
ip_tables  22042  1 iptable_filter
ebtable_nat12580  0 
ebtables   26274  1 ebtable_nat
x_tables   19073  5 
ebtables,ip_tables,iptable_filter,ip6_tables,ip6table_filter
mperf  12453  0 
cpufreq_stats  12866  0 
cpufreq_userspace  12576  0 
cpufreq_conservative13147  0 
ppdev  12763  0 
lp 17149  0 
cpufreq_powersave  12454  0 
rfcomm 33671  8 
bnep   17577  2 
binfmt_misc12957  1 
uinput 17440  1 
fuse   62117  1 
nfsd  220730  2 
nfs   313029  0 
nfs_acl12511  2 nfs,nfsd
auth_rpcgss37189  2 nfs,nfsd
fscache36807  1 nfs
lockd  67454  2 nfs,nfsd
sunrpc173816  6 lockd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,nfs,nfsd
kvm_intel 122008  0 
kvm   293782  1 kvm_intel
ext3  161959  1 
jbd57131  1 ext3
coretemp   12898  0 
loop   22641  0 
snd_hda_codec_hdmi 30783  1 

Bug#600286: atl1c driver hangs after NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Nelson
Greetings,

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Pavel Vorob`ev vorobev2...@mail.ru wrote:
 see end of message http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600286#32


I missed that. Sorry for that noise.

Also many thanks for the reply.


 Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:31:18 -0500 от Richard Nelson unix...@gmail.com:
 Greetings,

 I found this thread  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/24/365  with a patch
 of  https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2012/2/24/365/1  perhaps it assists
 some how on this issue.



 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/CA+p-VY-A-zVFL8-LODUdhRyLN95D=bbteqberb4qnlu6x5g...@mail.gmail.com





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ca+p-vy8+daj2k__xzpghwawvr+1p478mjxqc106t79muqoo...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#600286: atl1c driver hangs after NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out

2012-04-13 Thread Jonathan Nieder
forwarded 600286 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1252281/focus=221683
quit

Richard Nelson wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Pavel Vorob`ev vorobev2...@mail.ru wrote:

 see end of message http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600286#32

 I missed that. Sorry for that noise.

No, nothing to be sorry about.

Can you fill in the blanks for me?  What kernels have you tested since
the original report, and how did each behave?  Does that patch
successfully prevent the driver and card from hanging?  The
conversation upstream seems to have stopped without any conclusion a
couple of months ago.

Thanks,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120413161811.GA17116@burratino



Processed: Re: atl1c driver hangs after NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 600286 
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1252281/focus=221683
Bug #600286 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: atl1c driver hangs after 
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1252281/focus=221683'.
 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
600286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133433391020639.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#668650: Acknowledgement (sysvinit: mtab link breaks some setup with initramfs)

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # sysvinit will need to break initramfs-tools
 block 668650 by 668616
Bug #668650 [sysvinit] sysvinit: mtab link breaks some setup with initramfs
668650 was not blocked by any bugs.
668650 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 668650: 668616
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
668650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13343496872877.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Bug#668655: udev: USB device update are broken

2012-04-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
reassign 668655 linux-2.6
thanks

On Apr 13, Sergiy Gorel's'kiy kt...@bigmir.net wrote:

 Card reader connected to the system constantly.
 Then i run:
 tail -f /vat/log/syslog
 udevadm --monitor
 
 And when i insert the sd-card, there was no reaction.
Not my problem then.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#668655: udev: USB device update are broken

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 668655 linux-2.6
Bug #668655 [udev] udev: USB device update are broken
Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'.
No longer marked as found in versions udev/175-3.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #668655 to the same values 
previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
668655: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668655
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133435429625302.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#668655: udev: USB device update are broken

2012-04-13 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Sergiy,

Sergiy Gorel's'kiy wrote:

 I installed Debian Wheezy cleanly.
[...]
 And when i insert the sd-card, there was no reaction.

 I tried kernel from Debian Squeeze, where all works fine, but broblem is 
 still.
 And looked on situation in a virtual machine. Problem still there too.
 When i reload USB_STORAGE module or trying mount, for example,
 sdf (sdf1 - must be real partition on my sdcard) - the sd-card detected
 succesfully ?_?.

I'm not sure I follow completely.  So:

 - please attach output from reportbug --template linux-image-$(uname -r)
   so we can get to know your hardware better (it includes output from
   lspci -vvnn, for example).

 - please attach full dmesg output from booting up and reproducing
   the problem, and dmesg output from booting up and following the
   same steps on a working kernel for comparison

 - do you know what kernel version introduced this bug?  Can you
   narrow down the regression range by repeatedly trying the
   pre-compiled version halfway between the newest known-good and
   oldest known-bad kernel at

http://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-2.6/

   ?

 - any workarounds or other weird observations?

Thanks and hope that helps,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120413220641.GA19988@burratino



Bugs related to Linux package which are now orphan

2012-04-13 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hello,

I have unpleasant news...

I noticed that there are these orphan bugs (no maintainer set, the
package that they are filed against is not present in Debian anymore).
 They're about 121 (perhaps with some false positives), gathered from
[1], and attached (the list flattened to single lines in a text
file, easy to parse e.g. to extract bug numbers and reassign in bulk).

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=
  ^- (yes, with empy maint parameter)

What should be done with them, reassign?  To which package, then?


Cheers.


PS: Not subscribed to the list.


linux-orphan-bugs
Description: Binary data


Bug#668687: linux-image-3.3.0-trunk-amd64: Kernel oops when writing to sparse file on ocfs2 filesystem.

2012-04-13 Thread Samson Yeung
Package: linux-image-3.3.0-trunk-amd64
Version: 3.3-1~experimental.1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch


Writing to a sparse file on a single-node ocfs2 mount causes an oops.

dd if=/dev/zero of=/ocfs2/foo bs=1 count=0 seek=10G
yes | mkfs.ext3 /ocfs2/foo

Patch is at:
  http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2012-January/008464.html


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (700, 'stable-updates'), (700, 'stable'), (450, 'testing'), (300, 
'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120414002709.14708.59644.report...@ksplice.us.oracle.com



Processed: tagging 596741

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 596741 + pending
Bug #596741 [src:linux-2.6] regression: CPU fan fast after resume: won't climb 
back down
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #596741 to the same tags previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596741
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13343788433808.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 619034

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 619034 + pending
Bug #619034 [linux-2.6] Boot problem due to PCI core, x86 mm or ACPI/BIOS
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13343788443823.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 660554

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 660554 + pending
Bug #660554 [src:linux-2.6] Kernel crashes at boot in 
drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:163 when running under Xen 4.1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #660554 to the same tags previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660554: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13343788503839.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 619034

2012-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 619034 + pending
Bug #619034 [linux-2.6] Boot problem due to PCI core, x86 mm or ACPI/BIOS
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #619034 to the same tags previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13343790815478.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Uploading linux-2.6 (3.2.15-1)

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.15-1 during this weekend.  This
includes various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.15,
and may have urgency=high (to be decided).  There should not be any ABI
bump.

Would it be possible to accelerate testing migration of 3.2.14-1, so
that that happens before it's replaced by 3.2.15-1?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part