Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Friday 7 December 07:03:15 UTC 2012 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/cython";>cython > tags 615932 + pen

Processed: tagging 695318

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 695318 + moreinfo Bug #695318 [src:linux] linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: sdhci driver fails to interact with Ricoh e823 devices Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695318: ht

Bug#695318: linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: sdhci driver fails to interact with Ricoh e823 devices

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 02:31 +0100, Arno Töll wrote: > On 07.12.2012 02:27, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Did this driver work in any earlier kernel version? > > I tried it with both, 3.5 and 3.6 kernels. I have no other kernels > installed on system. If you suspect a regression in a particular version

Bug#695318: linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: sdhci driver fails to interact with Ricoh e823 devices

2012-12-06 Thread Arno Töll
On 07.12.2012 02:27, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Did this driver work in any earlier kernel version? I tried it with both, 3.5 and 3.6 kernels. I have no other kernels installed on system. If you suspect a regression in a particular version let me know which version I shall test. However, if my proble

Bug#695318: linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: sdhci driver fails to interact with Ricoh e823 devices

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 01:19 +0100, Arno Töll wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 3.6.8-1~experimental.1 > Severity: normal > > The Ricoh e823:1180 5-in-1 card reader, mounted in my Thinkpad 420s notebook > is > quite unusable for me on Linux despite of being claimed by the sdhci > (sdhci_pci)

Bug#695318: linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: sdhci driver fails to interact with Ricoh e823 devices

2012-12-06 Thread Arno Töll
Package: src:linux Version: 3.6.8-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal The Ricoh e823:1180 5-in-1 card reader, mounted in my Thinkpad 420s notebook is quite unusable for me on Linux despite of being claimed by the sdhci (sdhci_pci) driver. Inserting a SDHC card into the card slot I get mmc0: error -

[bts-link] source package src:linux

2012-12-06 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #692361 (http://bugs.debian.org/692361) # Bug title: ACPI display backlight brightne

Processed: Re: Bug#595502: [ia64] pata_cmd64x crashes at boot

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 595502 2.6.32-46 Bug #595502 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-46. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#595502: [ia64] pata_cmd64x crashes at boot

2012-12-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
found 595502 2.6.32-46 thanks On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:11:36AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> I suspect that v3.0-rc1~375^2~7 (pata_cm64x: fix boot crash on parisc, >> 2011-04-24) fixes it. > >Looking over the log again, I'm less confident about that. Someone >more k

Bug#695243: linux: Add stage1 build-profile support for bootstrapping

2012-12-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:53:53PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The binary packages and control files for intermediate stages do *not* > need to comply with normal policy. Where is the spec for this then? The binary packages still need a different version so they can't be mistaken. >

Processed: tagging 694734, tagging 687442

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694734 - patch Bug #694734 [src:linux] nouveau: black screen with GeForce GTX 560 Removed tag(s) patch. > # oops, we don't have a specific patch for #694734 > tags 687442 + patch Bug #687442 [src:linux] Use DRM/KMS subsystem from Linux 3.4 in

Bug#687442: Tested with GeForce 8500 GT: success

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
Forwarded Message From: Sven Joachim To: Ben Hutchings Cc: 694...@bugs.debian.org, Javier Domingo Subject: Re: Bug#694734: adjusting severity Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:15:44 +0100 On 2012-12-05 01:12 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Could you try Julien Cristau's kernel package

Bug#631799: [squeeze] Kernel logs "name_count maxed, losing inode data" messages

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:58 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > On 12/06/2012 01:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >>> It is not too difficult to fix up the conflicts. But this is a fairly > >>> big change, so I think this bug should now be 'wontfix' for wheezy. > >>> Sorry we didn't get it fixed earlier. > >>

Processed: severity of 694734 is important

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # hardware support is important > severity 694734 important Bug #694734 [src:linux] nouveau: black screen with GeForce GTX 560 Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 694734 to the same value. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: tagging 694734

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694734 + patch Bug #694734 [src:linux] nouveau: black screen with GeForce GTX 560 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 694734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Bug#687442: Further patches for 3.4 DRM in wheezy

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
bugfix/x86/drm-i915-Only-kick-out-vesafb-if-we-takeover-the-fbc.patch needs to be refreshed; attached. An additional patch (debian/revert-vm-add-vm_munmap-helper-function.patch) is needed to build the i810 driver (which is i386-only); attached. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Computers are not intelligen

Processed: retitle 687442 to Use DRM/KMS subsystem from Linux 3.4 in wheezy

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 687442 Use DRM/KMS subsystem from Linux 3.4 in wheezy Bug #687442 [src:linux] i915: DVI output broken on i5-3570K (Ivy Bridge) Changed Bug title to 'Use DRM/KMS subsystem from Linux 3.4 in wheezy' from 'i915: DVI output broken on i5-3570K

Bug#631799: [squeeze] Kernel logs "name_count maxed, losing inode data" messages

2012-12-06 Thread Rik Theys
On 12/06/2012 01:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: It is not too difficult to fix up the conflicts. But this is a fairly big change, so I think this bug should now be 'wontfix' for wheezy. Sorry we didn't get it fixed earlier. Sorry to hear that. Would a patch that simply increases the static number

Bug#695243: linux: Add stage1 build-profile support for bootstrapping

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:01 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:16:16AM +, Wookey wrote: > > In order to bootstrap a new architecture, a cross-toolchain must be > > built. A suitable linux-libc-dev_$arch package is needed for this. In > > order to make this (and cross-toolc

Bug#631799: [squeeze] Kernel logs "name_count maxed, losing inode data" messages

2012-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 10:58 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/01/2012 11:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:10 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > > [...] > >> I cherry picked commits 5ef30ee53b187786e64bdc1f8109e39d17f2ce58 and > >> 5195d8e217a78697152d64fc09a16e063a022465 and t

Re: Bug#695243: linux: Add stage1 build-profile support for bootstrapping

2012-12-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:16:16AM +, Wookey wrote: > In order to bootstrap a new architecture, a cross-toolchain must be > built. A suitable linux-libc-dev_$arch package is needed for this. In > order to make this (and cross-toolchain builds in general) > automatable, the packaging needs to be

Processing of linux_3.6.9-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes

2012-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux_3.6.9-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_3.6.9-1~experimental.1.dsc linux_3.6.9.orig.tar.xz linux_3.6.9-1~experimental.1.debian.tar.xz linux-doc-3.6_3.6.9-1~experimental.1_all.deb linux-support-3.6-trunk_3.6.9-1~experimental

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-12-06 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 06.12.12 at 09:34, Ian Campbell wrote: > (trim quote please...) > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 21:47 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Do you want to prep a patch that I can stick in my 'microcode' branch? >> .. That I will at some point try to upstream. > > You might want to look back at th

Bug#631799: [squeeze] Kernel logs "name_count maxed, losing inode data" messages

2012-12-06 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, On 12/01/2012 11:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:10 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: [...] I cherry picked commits 5ef30ee53b187786e64bdc1f8109e39d17f2ce58 and 5195d8e217a78697152d64fc09a16e063a022465 and tried to compile the result, but it failed with the following error: kern

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-12-06 Thread Ian Campbell
(trim quote please...) On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 21:47 +, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Do you want to prep a patch that I can stick in my 'microcode' branch? > .. That I will at some point try to upstream. You might want to look back at the archives when Jeremy first tried to upstream this work,