Le 23/01/2013 18:35, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
Pierre AUSSAGUEL wrote:
I installed again linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64 to be able to report the bug,
but the problem seem to have gone by now !
Maybe the version has changed (I am currently using 3.7.3-1~experimental.1
x86_64) since my previous
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:54:38AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 20-01-13 11:02:10, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
In bdi_position_ratio(), get difference (setpoint-dirty) right even when
negative. Both setpoint and dirty are unsigned long, the difference was
zero-padded thus wrongly
Hi Paul,
(This patch does not solve the PAE OOM issue.)
You may try the below debug patch. The only way the writeback patches
should trigger OOM, I think, is for the number of dirty/writeback
pages going out of control.
Or more simple, you may show us the OOM dmesg which will contain the
On Thu 24-01-13 22:57:07, Wu Fengguang wrote:
Hi Paul,
(This patch does not solve the PAE OOM issue.)
You may try the below debug patch. The only way the writeback patches
should trigger OOM, I think, is for the number of dirty/writeback
pages going out of control.
Or more simple, you
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Either:
a) request Suspend at the XFCE desktop
b) set Power Manager to suspend after a period of inactivty
Then:
resume from suspend by touchpad or keyboard activity
* What exactly
FUY, I filed a bug : n° 59792
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59792
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51015826.4070...@yahoo.fr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #698376 (http://bugs.debian.org/698376)
# Bug title: linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #627372 (http://bugs.debian.org/627372)
# Bug title: linux-image-2.6.38-2-686:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 697029 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59792
Bug #697029 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: i915_hangcheck_ring_idle
error makes the computer lag using intel core i7-620 integrated gpu
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Dear Fengguang,
Or more simple, you may show us the OOM dmesg which will contain the
number of dirty pages. ...
Do you mean kern.log lines like:
[ 744.754199] bash invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=1, oom_adj=0,
oom_score_adj=0
[ 744.754202] bash cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
[
Dear Jan,
I think he found the culprit of the problem being min_free_kbytes was not
properly reflected in the dirty throttling. ... Paul please correct me
if I'm wrong.
Sorry but have to correct you.
I noticed and patched/corrected two problems, one with (setpoint-dirty)
in
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:43:45AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Dear Fengguang,
Or more simple, you may show us the OOM dmesg which will contain the
number of dirty pages. ...
Do you mean kern.log lines like:
Yes.
[ 744.754199] bash invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0,
Dear Fengguang,
There are 260MB reclaimable slab pages in the normal zone ...
Marked all_unreclaimable? yes: is that wrong? Question asked also in:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmm=135873981326767w=2
... however we somehow failed to reclaim them. ...
I made a patch that would do a drop_caches
15 matches
Mail list logo
