On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 22:43 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 09/08/2013 06:30 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 23:22 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[...]
> >> +CONFIG_FUSION_SPI=m
> >> +
> >> +# Built-in NIC in C8000 workstation
> >> +CONFIG_E1000=m
> >
> > This is redundant with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/08/2013 06:30 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 23:22 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>> +# For the IDE CDROM in C8000 workstation
>> +CONFIG_IDE=m
>> +CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIIMAGE=m
>
> Why not CONFIG_PATA_SIL680 instead?
I will test if th
On 09/08/2013 04:19 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>> On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
>>> non-smp kernels.
>> I can do that. Do you have some background on thi
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 17:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > +# For the built-in SCSI controller in C8000 workstation
> > +CONFIG_FUSION=y
>
> Why should this be built-in?
Never mind, it doesn't select code...
> > +CONFIG_FUSION_SPI=m
[...]
but both the FUSION and FUSION_SPI symbol setting
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 23:22 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[...]
> diff -up ./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc64-smp.org
> ./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc64-smp
> --- ./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc64-smp.org2013-05-04
> 04:44:45.0 +0200
> +++ ./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc6
Hi,
Just FYI, as you might be interested in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722145
Kaplan
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 15:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 16:19 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > > On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 16:19 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
> > > non-smp kernels.
> > I can do that. Do you have some b
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
> > non-smp kernels.
> I can do that. Do you have some background on this request for me?
> Is it policy that you only wan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 714974 + pending
Bug #714974 [src:linux] nfs-kernel-server: Duplicate cookies reported - jfs
partition, with samba
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #714974 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 15:18 +0200, Carlo wrote:
> Ok. When will we see this kernel in testing maybe?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting answers this question in general.
Ben.
> 2013/9/8 Ben Hutchings :
> > I intend to upload linux to unstable tomorrow. This will include many
> > important fi
Ok. When will we see this kernel in testing maybe?
2013/9/8 Ben Hutchings :
> I intend to upload linux to unstable tomorrow. This will include many
> important fixes from stable updates 3.10.8-3.10.11 and fixes for some
> hardware support regressions on armel. It also adds udebs for
> armhf/armm
I intend to upload linux to unstable tomorrow. This will include many
important fixes from stable updates 3.10.8-3.10.11 and fixes for some
hardware support regressions on armel. It also adds udebs for
armhf/armmp, as a step toward ARM multiplatform installer support.
Unfortunately, it includes
Version: 3.10.7-1
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 01:21:02 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is from a Lenovo X1 Carbon, and also shows 'Thread overran stack,
> or stack corrupted':
>
> http://richardhartmann.de/img/DSC_0469.JPG
>
> (small version attached).
>
Yet another one:
http://people.debian.or
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 19:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 08:15 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > I can't think of any reason not to enable CONFIG_PCI for armmp at this
> > > stage. Arnaud?
> >
> > It turns out th
Your message dated Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:03:31 +0200
with message-id <20130908090331.gb28...@mail.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#578189: please move common headers to
/usr/src/linux-headers-`uname -r`
has caused the Debian Bug report #578189,
regarding please move common headers to /usr/src/l
16 matches
Mail list logo