Bug#839627: linux-image-4.7.0-1-amd64: kvm-clock provides unadjusted time

I have two KVM servers where I'm doing GPU passthrough to a VM. Both are running linux 4.6.4. We're using an NVIDIA GPU which means I have to hide KVM (kvm=off, or ). As a result, current_clocksource is tsc. ntpd shows a drift of ~0. So in seems that the tsc values the VM is getting are

linux_4.7.6-1_multi.changes is NEW

binary:linux-image-4.7.0-1-4kc-malta-dbgsym is NEW. binary:linux-image-4.7.0-1-5kc-malta-dbgsym is NEW. binary:linux-image-4.7.0-1-686-dbgsym is NEW. binary:linux-image-4.7.0-1-686-pae-dbgsym is NEW. binary:linux-image-4.7.0-1-amd64-dbgsym is NEW. binary:linux-image-4.7.0-1-arm64-dbgsym is NEW.

Processing of linux_4.7.6-1_multi.changes

linux_4.7.6-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_4.7.6-1.dsc linux_4.7.6.orig.tar.xz linux_4.7.6-1.debian.tar.xz linux-doc-4.7_4.7.6-1_all.deb linux-manual-4.7_4.7.6-1_all.deb linux-source-4.7_4.7.6-1_all.deb

Processed: Re: Bug#840128: linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 acpi-call-dkms 1.1.0-3 Bug #840128 [linux-perf-4.7] linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue Bug reassigned from package 'linux-perf-4.7' to 'acpi-call-dkms'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/4.7.5-1. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#840128: linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue

Control: reassign -1 acpi-call-dkms 1.1.0-3 Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 02:19 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: [...] >  Although invoking dkms status got me this - > > $ su - > Password: > root@think-debian:~# dkms status > acpi-call, 1.1.0, 4.6.0-1-amd64, x86_64: installed >

Bug#840128: linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue

at bottom :- On 09/10/2016, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 21:24 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> Package: linux-perf-4.7 >> Version: 4.7.5-1 >> Severity: normal >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> I was installing/upgrading the kernel when I

Re: linux_4.7.6-1_source.changes REJECTED

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 22:21 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address > our concerns. Why did this go to NEW?  Is

Bug#840128: linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 21:24 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Package: linux-perf-4.7 > Version: 4.7.5-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > I was installing/upgrading the kernel when I came across this - > > Setting up linux-headers-4.7.0-1-amd64 (4.7.5-1) ... >

Processed: Re: Bug#840128: linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #840128 [linux-perf-4.7] linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 840128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840128 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#840137: linux-image-4.7.0-1-armmp: Please add device-tree for imx53-usbarmory.

Package: linux-image-4.7.0-1-armmp Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please add the device-tree for the imx53-usbarmory, which was recently merged in linux mainline. Patch below. >From 17028ca2a5030a2e97f87b3290f814ba860480c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrej Rosano

Bug#840061: Enable I2C/IPMI and EDAC for X-Gene

I've now tested the same changes on 4.8~rc8-1~exp1 and they work there too.

Bug#840128: linux-perf-4.7: dependency module installation issue

Package: linux-perf-4.7 Version: 4.7.5-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I was installing/upgrading the kernel when I came across this - Setting up linux-headers-4.7.0-1-amd64 (4.7.5-1) ... /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms: Error! Problems with depmod detected. Automatically uninstalling

Bug#822671: initramfs-tools: preserves unmodified /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf on upgrades from jessie

On 2 October 2016 at 07:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 09:57 +1000, Andrew Worsley wrote: >> Hi, I am a newbie (have a mentor account and looking to help) >> I just looked into this bug and tried to apply the patch - but it >> appears the files are missing