Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:19:32 +
with message-id <1490379572.2634.2.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#858619: -dbg package for ppc64el
has caused the Debian Bug report #858619,
regarding -dbg package for ppc64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
[drop some CCs since this is not directly related to the xmlto bug]
On 24/03/17 09:36, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:06 AM, James Cowgill wrote:
>> I believe any of the following will fix this (but have not all been tested):
>> - Reduce the stack usage
Source: linux
Source-Version: 4.10-1~exp1
Tags: patch
--
Hi,
what is the policy for having a -dbg package for linux-image packages ?
Some architecture have one, some others don't.
Would it be possible that ppc64el have one, please ? :)
Ideally having it in unstable would be nice, but because of
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:06 AM, James Cowgill wrote:
> reassign 858405 xsltproc
> forcemerge 750593 858405
> retitle 750593 xsltproc: bus error on some arches with linux < 4.1
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> On 22/03/17 21:01, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Wed 2017-03-22 06:22:41
4 matches
Mail list logo