Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?

On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 16:29:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: block 491027 by -1 > > On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 12:51:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:10:14 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote: > > > Package: initramfs-tools

Uploading linux (4.15.4-1)

Hi I intend to upload linux 4.15.4-1 to unstable possibly tomorrow (sunday). As this is a new upstream release, there will be an ABI bump. There is at least one problem: The armel/marvell kernel size is growing to large and the compressed image is over the limit. Given the armel architecture

Bug#886858:

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, 2018-01-13 at 15:29 +, Dennis Heddicke wrote: > I tested the 3.16.53 upstream kernel and got the same problem. > Will you do something against this? Shall i report upstream? For some reason your original bug report didn't make it to the debian- kernel mailing

Processed: Re: Bug#886858:

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #886858 [src:linux] linux-image-3.16.0-5-686-pae: Kernle fails to boot/Kernle-Panic Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 886858: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886858 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: severity of 886858 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 886858 important Bug #886858 [src:linux] linux-image-3.16.0-5-686-pae: Kernle fails to boot/Kernle-Panic Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 886858:

Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support?

On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 19:51 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think we should bump ABI again. Thanks for the feedback. I'll do that and remove all the ABI reverts and ignores. > We should also do the equivalent of > these changes in sid, with s/gcc-7/gcc-6/. > > * [x86] Add versioned

Bug#800835: marked as done (firmware-linux-free: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/skl_dmc_ver1.bin for module i915)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 19:48:01 + with message-id <1518896881.2617.136.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: firmware-linux-free: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/skl_dmc_ver1.bin for module i915 has caused the Debian Bug report #800835, regarding

Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support?

On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 18:30 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 11:54 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > There's a bunch of ABI breaks in 4.9.81 again, and we ignored/reverted a lot > > of them since 4.9.65+kaiser, so maybe it'll be a good idea at one point, > > but I >

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:48:51PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Did you had a chance to look at Ben's suggestions or ideas? > We would like to ideally upload a 4.15.x based version to unstable > (currently imported 4.15.4). I would start with disabling it. The armel architecture (not

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

Hi Roger, On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:30:23PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 22:38 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > Dear Ben, > > > > Thanks for keeping armel things rolling for a few releases! > > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Ben Hutchings