Bug#896866: linux-image-4.15.0-2-amd64: Unable to shutdown

2018-04-24 Thread François GUERIN
Package: src:linux Version: 4.15.11-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? When shuting down the computer, I've a console message: "do_IRQ 0.55 No irq handler for vector" and the computer is blocked, I've to press the power button for 10 s to effectively shut d

Debian kernel contributions

2018-04-24 Thread Romain Perier
Hello, My name is Romain, I am an upstream linux contributor and I would like to contribute on downstream projects like Debian. In my free time, I love hacking (and beer too! but that's another business :p) . I would want to focus on kernel development and perhaps a bit of kernel packaging too.

Bug#718196: marked as done (linux-image-3.9-0.bpo.1-kirkwood: mv_cesa broken)

2018-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:37:59 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#718196: linux-image-3.9-0.bpo.1-kirkwood: mv_cesa broken has caused the Debian Bug report #718196, regarding linux-image-3.9-0.bpo.1-kirkwood: mv_cesa broken to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Re: linux backport in jessie LTS

2018-04-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 15:44 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Therefore, would it make sense to add a Linux 4.9 backport to the > > regular jessie and jessie-security suites? > > Yes, I think so. It's also interesting to keep a security-supported > kerne

linux-tools_3.16.56-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

2018-04-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 21:46:20 +0100 Source: linux-tools Binary: linux-kbuild-3.16 linux-tools-3.16 libusbip-dev usbip hyperv-daemons Architecture: i386 source Version

Re: linux backport in jessie LTS

2018-04-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Therefore, would it make sense to add a Linux 4.9 backport to the > regular jessie and jessie-security suites? Yes, I think so. It's also interesting to keep a security-supported kernel once we are past the usual 5 years of LTS (aka Extended LTS). Since

Bug#896666: qemu-system-x86: page allocation failure: 4.15.0-0.bpo.2-amd64

2018-04-24 Thread Russell Mosemann
Package: src:linux Version: 4.15.11-1~bpo9+1 Severity: important Apr 24 00:38:33 vhost003 kernel: qemu-system-x86: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x140c0c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=(null) Apr 24 00:38:33 vhost003 kernel: qemu-system-x86 cpuset=emulator mems_allowed=0-1

Bug#896775: [PATCH] Backport support for Qualcomm Centriq onboard emac NIC

2018-04-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
Source: linux Version: 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hey folks, I've backported support for the onboard network interface on the Qualcomm Centriq arm64 server platform, mostly straight cherry-picks from upstream 4.15. Please apply the patch to add this support for the next Stretch