Re: Bug#926387: oxygen-icons5: FTBFS randomly (Directory renamed before its status could be extracted)

2019-06-06 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2019-06-07, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 10:02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: >> Hmm, I said: >> > Is dpkg in buster calling tar with any options that makes this >> > behaviour to happen more easily? Is tar in buster more prone to this >> > failure when using overlayfs? >> >>

Processed: severity of 930029 is important

2019-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 930029 important Bug #930029 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64: Kernel stucks at load initramfs on ASUS KGPE-D16 Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#929557: Some Thoughts

2019-06-06 Thread Sam Hartman
The linux Kernel introduced an upstream commit designed to remove an interface that was being misused. That does not meet the kind of requirements for changes that we (Debian) make in stable releases. If I filed an unblock for krb5 to remove an interface at this point in the release process it

Re: ZFS in Buster

2019-06-06 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi Zigo On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 02:43:16PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > In such case, would you consider maintaining this tiny patch? > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/61076/commits/7b77c27caa8617c82df5c5af6b9ce6ae010d7f9a Please read https://bugs.debian.org/929557. Thanks for following

Re: ZFS in Buster

2019-06-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 5/29/19 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 13:43 +0200, Dan wrote: >> The commit also affects ZFS 0.7 because SIMD is used for checksum operations. >> >> There might be a performance penalty in ZFS only if Debian Buster >> upgrades to 4.19.38. > > Which we will, some time