Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:39:29 +0200
Source: linux
Architecture: source
Version: 5.13.12-1~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By: Bastian Blank
Closes: 987815 992219
linux_5.13.12-1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_5.13.12-1~exp1.dsc
linux_5.13.12.orig.tar.xz
linux_5.13.12-1~exp1.debian.tar.xz
linux_5.13.12-1~exp1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:35:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992221: fixed in linux 5.13.12-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992221,
regarding 5.13 FTBFS on armel (kernel-wedge find-dups)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:35:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992219: fixed in linux 5.13.12-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992219,
regarding linux-kbuild-5.13 misses modules-check.sh
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:35:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992251: fixed in linux 5.13.12-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992251,
regarding Select `CONFIG_X86_PLATFORM_DRIVERS_DELL` for Dell devices
(regression)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:35:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992219: fixed in linux 5.13.12-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992219,
regarding Cannot open
/usr/src/linux-headers-5.13.0-trunk-common/scripts/modules-check.sh: No such
file
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2021 21:35:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987815: fixed in linux 5.13.12-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #987815,
regarding MPTCP is not enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.46-4
Followup-For: Bug #941450
X-Debbugs-Cc: wvdak...@wilsoft.nl
Dear Maintainer,
This still occurs in bullseye kernel version linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64.
[411030.468716] e1000e :00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
TDH
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 19:07:10 +0200
Source: firmware-nonfree
Architecture: source
Version: 20210716-1~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By: maximilian attems
Changes:
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 19:00:37 +0200
Source: firmware-nonfree
Architecture: source
Version: 20210511-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By: maximilian attems
Changes:
firmware-nonfree_20210716-1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_20210716-1~exp1.dsc
firmware-nonfree_20210716.orig.tar.xz
firmware-nonfree_20210716-1~exp1.debian.tar.xz
firmware-nonfree_20210716-1~exp1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
firmware-nonfree_20210511-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_20210511-1.dsc
firmware-nonfree_20210511-1.debian.tar.xz
firmware-nonfree_20210511-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Hi Tim,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:54:47PM +1000, Tim Connors wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg88356.html
> > >
> > > points to a patch that has supposedly already been applied to
> > > bluetooth-next, but is
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 cloud-initramfs-growroot 0.18.debian8
Bug #992502 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: upgrade buster/bullseye fails;
wrong path in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/growroot for udevadm
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to
Control: reassign -1 cloud-initramfs-growroot 0.18.debian8
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Josef Dean Butler wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.140
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 992004
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201106104725.gc2785...@kroah.com/
Bug #992004 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: UCSI race condition resulting in wrong port state
for USB power delivery
Set
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 992004 5.13.9-1~exp1
Bug #992004 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: UCSI race condition
resulting in wrong port state for USB power delivery
Marked as fixed in versions linux/5.13.9-1~exp1.
Bug #992004 [src:linux]
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:10:43AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:40:45PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > > From: Benjamin Berg
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > so, I kept running in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 991941 - moreinfo
Bug #991941 [src:linux] linux: Don't use nouveau with Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT or
alert in dmesg that firmware is needed
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:40:57 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#992561: linux-headers-amd64 dependency to
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64 is broken in buster-backports
has caused the Debian Bug report #992561,
regarding linux-headers-amd64 dependency to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 992561 - a11y
Bug #992561 [linux-headers-amd64] linux-headers-amd64 dependency to
linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64 is broken in buster-backports
Removed tag(s) a11y.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi, Vincent.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Followup-For: Bug #908196
> Is it still worthwhile to enable this option?
IMO yes. I have the thing sitting on my desk now, it runs Debian, and it
serves its function.
> So if this router
Hi Reco,
Le 2021-08-20 11:16, Reco a écrit :
> Hi, Vincent.
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Followup-For: Bug #908196
>
> > Is it still worthwhile to enable this option?
>
> IMO yes. I have the thing sitting on my desk now, it
Package: linux-headers-amd64
Version: 4.19+105+deb10u12
Severity: important
Tags: a11y
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I wanted to install the linux-headers-amd64 package from buster-backports.
24 matches
Mail list logo
