Mapping bullseye to stable.
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 01:13:22 +0200
Source: wireless-regdb
Architecture: source
Version: 2022.04.08-2~deb11u1
Distribution: bullseye
Urgency: medium
Ben Hutchings wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:08:24AM +0200:
> > Sorry this wasn't clear. I didn't mean obsolete as no longer useful,
> > just that it is old: wireless-regdb-udeb hasn't been updated in two
> > years, while the main wireless-regdb package keeps getting updates
> > regularly.
>
>
On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 08:27 +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:39:23PM +0200:
> > On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 09:39 +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > > the udeb regdb is also slightly obsolete, I'm not sure why it was needed
> > > in the first place but
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
[ Reason ]
Provide current information about national radio regulations to the
Linux Wi-Fi stack.
[ Impact ]
Users may accidentally
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:01:25 +0200
Source: wireless-regdb
Architecture: source
Version: 2022.04.08-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian kernel team
Changed-By: Ben Hutchings
Closes: 1012601
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2~deb11u1_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2~deb11u1.dsc
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2~deb11u1.debian.tar.xz
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2~deb11u1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2022 23:32:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1012601: fixed in wireless-regdb 2022.04.08-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012601,
regarding wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install
to be marked as done.
This means that you
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2.dsc
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2.debian.tar.xz
wireless-regdb_2022.04.08-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Control: forwarded -1
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220629224938.7760-1-didi.deb...@cknow.org/
On Wednesday, 29 June 2022 15:24:45 CEST Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Looks good to me. Can you send it on to sta...@vger.kernel.org?
> You'll need to add your Signed-off-by.
Done.
signature.asc
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220629224938.7760-1-didi.deb...@cknow.org/
Bug #1013299 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-20-amd64: NULL pointer deref in
qdisc_put() due to missing backport
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1012835 - security
Bug #1012835 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: entropy dropped to 256
from ~4k after 5.10.120-1 update
Bug #1013192 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: ridiculously small
entropy pool
Bug #1013241 [src:linux]
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:56:44 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1014038: linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: write protected
files deleted
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014038,
regarding linux-image-5.10.0-15-amd64: write protected files deleted
to be marked as done.
On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 16:49 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 June 2022 15:24:45 CEST Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 patch
> > Control: tag -1 - help
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 11:47 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 16:11:42 CEST Diederik
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.18.5-1
Severity: normal
File: i915
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 5.18.0-2-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-11 (Debian
11.3.0-3) 11.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.38.50.20220615) #1 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 5.18.5-1
ср, 29 черв. 2022 р. о 16:32 Ben Hutchings пише:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:34:17 Андрій Василишин
> wrote:
> > Because it is the latest kernel which supports aufs.
> > Problem gone when I change to default parameters NIC Mellanox
> Technologies
> > MT28908 Family [ConnectX-6]
> > ethtool -C
Diederik de Haas dixit:
>I proposed my patch to expedite things and (much) prefer that Thorsten would
I’m not the author…
>I can do it, but I would like Thorsten to test the patch and confirm it
It’s obviously correct, it moves the nil check to the correct place.
I tested “the reverse” by
Good Day,
My name is Luis Fernandez, I am contacting you because we have
investors that have the capacity to invest in any massive project
in your country or invest in your existing project that requires
funding. Kindly get back to me for more details.
Best Regards,
Luis Fernandez
On Wednesday, 29 June 2022 15:24:45 CEST Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
> Control: tag -1 - help
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 11:47 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 16:11:42 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > > So yes, this needs to also be fixed upstream
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:34:17 Андрій Василишин
wrote:
> Because it is the latest kernel which supports aufs.
> Problem gone when I change to default parameters NIC Mellanox Technologies
> MT28908 Family [ConnectX-6]
> ethtool -C enp161s0f0np0 rx-usecs 8 rx-frames 128 tx-usecs 8 tx-frames 128
[...]
Control: tag -1 patch
Control: tag -1 - help
On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 11:47 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 16:11:42 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > So yes, this needs to also be fixed upstream (hence me including that tag
> > > when reporbugging), but perhaps Debian can
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #1013299 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-20-amd64: NULL pointer deref in
qdisc_put() due to missing backport
Added tag(s) patch.
> tag -1 - help
Bug #1013299 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-20-amd64: NULL pointer deref in
qdisc_put() due to missing
On Wednesday, 29 June 2022 03:38:47 CEST William Melgaard wrote:
>* What led up to the situation?
> Within Dolphin, a folder was highlighted. This folder was a development
> folder congaing read-only backup files. I clicked on a file that was
> obsolete, and instrcuted Dolphin to . I did not
22 matches
Mail list logo
